ANDROID-BASED-GAME AND BLENDED LEARNING IN CHEMISTRY: EFFECT ON STUDENTS’ SELF-EFFICACY AND ACHIEVEMENT

Nur Fitriyana, Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Antuni Wiyarsi, Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jaslin Ikhsan, Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Kristian Handoyo Sugiyarto, Chemistry Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

 10.21831/cp.v39i3.28335

Abstract


The 21st century learning system demands the use of technology in learning instruction. This research focuses on the comparison between the use of android-based-game and blended learning in the Chemistry subject on the hydrocarbon lesson toward students’ self-efficacy and achievement. A quasi-experiment with post-test only design was adopted in this research. A number of 143 eleventh graders from two public senior high schools in Purworejo Regency, Indonesia were selected in a cluster random sampling as the research sample. The sample was classified into three groups depending on the media used, i.e. android-based-game only on face-to-face learning (ABG-FTFL), blended learning only (BL), and both android-based-game and blended learning (ABG-BL). Self-Efficacy Scale (SES) was used to obtain the data of students’ self-efficacy while the hydrocarbon test was used to obtain students’ achievement. One-way Analysis of Variance, Kruskal Wallis test, and descriptive quantity technique were performed in the data analysis, and it is found that the use of these technologies has a significant effect on the students’ self-efficacy and achievement. The use of ABG-BL is better in improving students’ self-efficacy while BL is better in enhancing students’ achievement. Therefore, the use of android-based-game and blended learning can be emphasized as media in chemistry learning to gain better self-efficacy and achievement among students.

Keywords


achievement; android-based-game; blended learning; chemistry; self-efficacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abulibdeh, E. S., & Hasan, S. S. S. (2011). E-learning interactions, information technology self efficacy and student achievement at the University of Sharjah, UAE. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 1014-1025. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.926.

Akgündüz, D., & Akınoğlu, O. (2017). The impact of blended learning and social media-supported learning on the academic success and motivation of the students in science education. Education and Science, 42(191), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6444.

Alqurashi, E. (2016). Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v9i1.9549.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy the exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Bernard, P., Bros, P., & Migdat-Mikuli, A. (2017). Influence of blended learning on outcomes of students attending a general chemistry course: Summary of a five-year-long study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18, 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00040e.

Calimag, J. N., Mugel, P. A., Conde, R. S., & Aquino, L. B. (2014). Ubquitous learning environment using android mobile application. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology , 2(2), 119-128. http://www.impactjournals.us.

Candarli, D., & Yuksel, H. (2012). Students’ perceptions of video-conferencing in the classrooms in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663.

Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H., & Akay, H. (2011). A phenomenological study of instructors’ experiences on an open source learning management system. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 790-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.144.

Chen, Y-L. (2014). A study on student self-efficacy and technology acceptance model within an online task-based learning environment. Journal of Computers, 9(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.4304/jcp.9.1.34-43.

Chuang, T.-Y., & Chen, W.-F. (2005). Effect of digital games on children’s cognitive achievement. Journal of Multimedia, 2(5), 27-30. https://doi.org/10.4304/jmm.2.5.27-30.

Dwijonagoro, S., & Suparno. (2019). Pranatacara learning: Modeling, mind mapping, e-learning, or hybrid learning?. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 156-173. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.23034.

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational psychology. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.

Francis, R., & Shannon, S. J. (2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.766679.

Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s’ alpha reliability coefficient for Likert type scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 82-88. http://hdl.handle.net/1805/344.4.

Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Gulbinskienė, D., Masoodi, M., & Šliogerienė, J. (2017). Moodle as virtual learning environment in developing language skills, fostering metacognitive awareness and promoting learner autonomy. Pedagogy, 127(3), 176-185. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2017.47.

Horzum, M. B. (2014). A longitudinal and cross-sectional research on the learning approaches and transactional distance in students of blended learning. Education and Science, 39(74), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2014.1858.

Jabbour, K. K. (2014). An analysis of the effect of mobile learning on Lebanese higher education. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2014.01.

Jenaabadi, H., Nastiezaie, N., & Safarzaie, H. (2017). The relationship of academic burnout and academic stress with academic self-efficacy among graduate students. The New Educational Review, 49(3), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.49.3.05.

Jeng, Y. L., Wu, T. T., Huang, Y. M., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 3-11. http://www.etc.edu.cn/public/pages/reference-foreign/59The%20Add-on%20Impact%20of%20Mobile%20Applications%20in%20Learning%20Strategies--A%20Review%20Study.pdf.

Kopciewicz, L., & Bougsiaa, H. (2018). Is technology a magic wand? When tablets’ affordances meet teaching practices: Insights on didactic design. The New Educational Review, 51(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2018.51.1.06.

Kuzminska, O., Morze, N., & Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2017). Flipped learning model: Tools and experience of its implementation in higher education. The New Educational Review, 49(3), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.49.3.15.

Makarem, S. C. (2015). Using online video lectures to enrich traditional face-to-face courses. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.8212a.

Martin, M. (2005). Seeing is believing: The role of video conferencing in distance learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00471.x.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended Learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.

Nais, M. K., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2018). The profile of students’ self-efficacy using virtual chem-lab in hybrid learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012060.

Newby, T. J., Stepich, D. A., Lehman, J. D., & Russel J. D. (2006). Educational technology for teaching and learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Nordby, M., Knain, E., & Jonsdottir, G. (2017). Vocational students’ meaning-making in school science – negotiating authenticity through multimodal mobile learning. Nordina, 13(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.2976.

Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational psychology developing learners. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Ozsoy-Gunes, Z., Gunes, I., & Kirbaslar, M. (2014). Investigation of the relationships between educational internet use self-efficacy and self-regulated learning skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 152, 708-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.308.

Pandey, H., & Pande, P. (2014). Video conferencing: An efficient e-learning tool for distance education. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 10(2), 308-311. http://www.ijisr.issr-journals.org/abstract.php?article=IJISR-14-185-01.

Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024.

Ramnarain, U., & Ramaila, S. (2018). The relationship between chemistry self-efficacy of South African first year university students and their academic performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00110j.

Retnowati, E., & Aqiila. (2017). The effectiveness of dyad strategy during mathematics learning based on CORE model. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v35i1.12628.

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology. New York, NY: The MC Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Sarıtepeci, M., & Çakır, H. (2015). The effect of blended learning environments on student’s academic achievement and student engagement: A study on social studies course. Education and Science, 40(177), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.2592.

Sarkodie, P. S., & Adu-gyamfi, K. (2015). Improving students’ performance in naming and writing structural formulae of hydrocarbons using the ball-and-stick models. Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 203-219. http://khimiya.org/show_issue.php?y=2015&vol=24&issue=2&i_id=54.

Seery, M. K., & O’Connor, C. (2015). E-learning and blended learning in chemistry education. In J. García‐Martínez & E. Serrano‐Torregrosa (Eds.). Chemistry Education: Best Practices, Opportunities and Trends. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley VCH, pp. 651-669. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679300.ch26.

Shaine, M. H. (2015). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy on academic achievement of primary school students. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4(3), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20150403.14.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(4), 2-20. http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/664.

Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Blended learning or e-learning? International Magazine on Advances in Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3(1), 103-110. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2282881.

Tekane, R., Pilcher, L. A., & Potgieter, M. (2019). Blended learning in a second year organic chemistry class: Students’ perceptions and preferences of the learning support. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00099b.

Uzuntiryaki, E. (2008). Exploring the sources of turkish pre-service chemistry teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(6), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2008v33n6.2.

Williams, N. A., Bland, W., & Christie, G. (2008). Improving students’ achievement and satisfication by adopting a blended learning approach to inorganic chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. P Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1039/b801290n.

Wiyarsi, A., Pratomo, H. & Priyambodo, E. (2020). Vocational high school students’ chemical literacy on context-based learning: a case of petroleum topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 147- 161. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.18.

Woldeamanuel, M., Atagana, H., & Engida, T. (2014). What makes chemistry difficult? African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(2), 31-43. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/104070.

Yasar, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2010). A working successor of learning management system: SLOODLE. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5682-5685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.928.

Yüksel, I., & Üniversitesi, E. O. (2014). Investigating the impact of classroom management course on self-efficacy levels: An experimental study on pre-service teachers. Education and Science, 39(171), 259-269. http://eb.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/download/2289/644.

Yurt, E. (2014). The predictive power of self-efficacy sources for mathematics. Education and Science, 39(176), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3443.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.28335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


 

Social Media:

     

 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web analytics
View Our Stats