Evaluasi pelaksanaan Peraturan Walikota Yogyakarta No 53 Tahun 2011 tentang Gerakan Segoro Amarto dalam penanggulangan kemiskinan

Patma Tuasikal, Sunarso Sunarso

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kesesuain Program Gerakan Segoro Amarto (PGSA) dengan kebutuhan masyarakat,mengungkapkan implementasi PGSA berdasarkan dampak sosial ekonomi untuk mengetahui kendala implementasi PGSA di Kota Yogyakarta. Jenis penetian deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan evaluasi program model CIPP. Penentuan subjek teknik purposive. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, dokumentasi, dan observasi. Analisis data interaktif model . Hasil penelitian menunjukan: (1) PGSA dilaksanakan karena kepadatan penduduk masih tinggi, tingkat kemiskinan relatif besar, pergeseran nilai gotong royong, (2) Implementasi PGSA meliputi; sosialisasi, pendataan/pemetaan, penyaluran dana, pengambilan dana, penggunaan dana, monitoring/evaluasi, pelaporan, 3) Dampak sosial ekonomi cukup baik pada hubungan lingkungan sosial budaya, berkembangnya usaha ekonomi, memberantas kemiskinan, peningkatan pendidikan, peningkatan kesehatan, 4) Kendalanya, kurang adanya komunikasi yang baik, sosialisasi program terlalu cepat, bertumpuknya program masyarakat, usulan tanah program sulit terealisasi, kurang adanya pemanfaatan dana, kurang meratanya daya dukung masyarakat.

Kata kunci: gerakan segoro amarto, penanggulangan kemiskinan

 

AN EVALUATION OF YOGYAKARTA  MAYOR REGULATION NO.53 OF 2011 CONCERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SEGORO PROGRAM IN POVERTY REDUCTION

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the suitability SAMP  with the community needs, as well as revealing SAMP implementation based on socio-economic impacts to determine SAMP implementation constraints in the city of Yogyakarta. The study used a model of CIPP program evaluation approach developed. The subjects purposive technique. The data collected using interview, documentation, and observation. analyzed using the interactive model. The results showed: (1) implemented SAMP because the population density is still high, poverty rate is still relatively large, the value of mutual cooperation. (2) The implementation SAMP include; dissemination, data collection / mapping, disbursement of funds, the withdrawal of funds, use of funds, monitoring / evaluation, reporting, (3) socio-economic effects quite well on the relationship socio-cultural environment, development of the economy, eradicate poverty, education health, improving health, (4) the constraints, lack of good communication, socialization program too quickly, the accumulation of the public program, the proposed program of land difficult to be realized, lack of utilization of the funds, uneven community supports.

Keywords: segoro amarto movement program, poverty reduction,

Keywords


gerakan segoro amarto, penanggulangan kemiskinan

References


Badan Perencanaan Daerah Kota Yogyakarta. (2013). Badan perencanaan pembangunan daerah kota yogyakarta: Modul pelatihan parameter gerakan segoro amarto. Yogyakarta: Badan Perencanaan Daerah Kota Yogyakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015b). Indikator kesejahteraan sosial: Welfare indicators. Jakarta-Indonesia: Badan Pusat Statistik

Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia (2015a). Diakses tanggal 09 November 2015 dari http://www.bps.go.id/link Tabel Statis /view/id/1494

Baum, F., & Duvnjak, A.. (2013). The Politics of Poverty in Australia. Journal Alternative, 32(1), 12-18

Bebbington, A. J., Mitlin, D., Mogaladi, J., Scurrah, M., & Bielich, C. (2010). Decentring poverty, reworking government: Social movements and states in the goverment of poverty. Journal of development studies, 46, 7, 1304–1326.

Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2015). Design and non-design in policy-making:when and policy design maters: Proposal for a workshop ECPR joint sessions of workshops Warsaw, Poland. Diakses pada tanggal 19 November 2015.

Fischer, F. M., Miller, G. J., & Sidney, M. S. (2015). Handbook kebijakan publik. Bandung: Nusa Media.

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: alternative approach and pratical guidelines. New Jersey: Perarson Education Inc.

Geurts, T. (2014). Public policy making:The21 Century perspective.The Netherlands: Be Informed.

Hamdi, M. (2014). Kebijakan publik :Proses, analisis, dan partisipasi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Lasmawan, W & Suryadi, M. (2012). Pengembangan model pengentasan kemiskinan berbasis nilai-nilai nyamabraya ( Ajaran tatwamasi) pada masyarakat perkotaan di provinsi bali. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja Indonesia. Journal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 1, 2303-2898.

Lynam, S. (2006). Comunity development and public policy: Combat poverty agency.

Martens, M. D. (2010). Research and evalution in education and psychology integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed method. (3rd Ed.). Washington Dc: Galadent University.

Michaud. (2011). Public policy: secret et enjeux de administration publique. Quebec: Press de University Laval

Paudel, N. R. (2009). Health policy implementation in Nepal: Some dilemmas. Central Department of Public Administration, Public Administration Campus. Tribhuvan University Kathmandu: Nepal.

Presiden Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 166 Tahun 2014 Tentang Program Percepatan dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. (2014).

Sirma, D. S., & Jenkins, S. P. (2013). Poverty trends in Turkey. Discussion Paper No. 7823 December 2013 diselenggaraan oleh Department of Social Policy London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom.

Supriyanto (2006) Pemberdayaan usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah (UMKM) sebagai salah satu upaya penanggulangan kemiskinan. Journal Ekonomi & Pendidikan,3(1).

Tantoro, S. (2014). Pembasmian kemiskinan prespektif sosiologi –antropologi.Yogyakarta :Pustaka Pelajar.

vom Hau, M., & Wilde, G. (2010). We have always lived here: indigenous movements, citizenship and poverty in Argentina. The Journal of Development Studies, 7, 1283-1303

Walikota Yogyakarta. Peraturan Walikota Yogyakarta Nomor 53, Tahun 2011,tentang gerakan Segoro Amarto. (2011)

Wodon, Q. T. (1999). Growth, poverty, and inequality: A regional panel for bangladesh, the world bank, policy reasearch working paper, March 2007.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v5i2.9861

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Our journal indexed by:



Printed ISSN (p-ISSN): 2356-1807 | Online ISSN (e-ISSN): 2460-7916

Creative Commons License
Harmoni Sosial by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/hsjpi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Harmoni Sosial Stats