Peer Review

Overview

All research articles in Ethnomathematics Journal are peer reviewed. The journal follows the COPE Core Practices and the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

Model Double-blind: authors and reviewers do not know each other’s identities
Reviewers At least two independent reviewers per manuscript
Target 4–8 weeks from submission to a first decision
Decisions Accept without revision, minor revision, major revision, reject

The process

  1. Submission. The author submits the manuscript through the website, following the Author Guidelines.
  2. Initial check. The editors check the scope, the format, the quality of the English, and the similarity of the text. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements may be rejected or returned without review. See Plagiarism Policy.
  3. Review. The editor invites at least two independent reviewers. See Reviewer Selection and Reviewer Guidelines.
  4. Decision. The editors decide on the basis of the reviews. See Editorial Decisions and Revision.
  5. Revision. If revision is needed, the author revises and responds to each comment. The editors may send the revision to the reviewers again.
  6. Production. Accepted manuscripts are copyedited, typeset, and proofread before publication.

Anonymity and confidentiality

  • Authors must remove identifying details from the manuscript. Reviewers do not see the names of the authors, and authors do not see the names of the reviewers.
  • Manuscripts and reviews are confidential. See Peer Review Confidentiality.

Integrity of the process

Appeals

Authors who disagree with a rejection may appeal. See Editorial Appeals.

Questions

Write to ethnomath@uny.ac.id. See also the Editorial Procedures and Publication Ethics.