Determinants of economic literacy among Russian university students: A Hierarchical Linear Modeling approach
This study investigates factors influencing economic literacy among university students in Russia, addressing a significant gap in the existing literature. Economic literacy is widely recognized as a universal competency essential for navigating rapidly changing economic environments. Using a psychometrically robust Test of Economic Literacy (TEL) and a supplementary survey, the research employed Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) to analyze data from 1,115 students nested within 56 academic groups across five Russian universities, accounting for both individual- and group-level influences. Key results identified academic specialization (both at high school and university levels) and individual interest in economics as the strongest positive predictors of economic literacy. Notably, receiving pocket money irregularly (vs. regularly) significantly enhanced economic literacy, suggesting adaptability benefits. Conversely, students enrolled in non-economic fields (e.g., humanities, social sciences, technical sciences, pedagogy, service/tourism) demonstrated lower levels of economic literacy compared to economics majors. Socio-demographic factors such as gender and age showed no significant effects. These findings highlight the importance of both formal academic pathways and informal experiential learning, offering insights for educators and policymakers seeking to enhance economic literacy in Russia’s evolving economic landscape.
Downloads
REFERENCES
Baskara, A., Ahman, E., Kusnendi, & Dahlan, D. (2024). How do Dimensions and Determinants Influence Economic Literacy? A Systematic Exploration and Future Research Agenda. Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies, 07(12). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i12-59
Brückner, S., Förster, M., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Walstad, W. B. (2015). Effects of prior economic education, native language, and gender on economic knowledge of first-year students in higher education. A comparative study between Germany and the USA. Studies in Higher Education, 40(3), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1004235
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
DİLEK, S., KESGİNGÖZ, H., KONAK, A., & HALICIOĞLU, S. (2018). Factors Affecting Economic Literacy. Afro Eurasian Studies, 7(1), 7–47. https://doi.org/10.33722/afes.475575
Federiakin, D., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Kardanova, E., Kühling-Thees, C., Reichert-Schlax, J., & Koreshnikova, Y. (2022). Cross-national structure of economic competence: Insights from a German and Russian assessment. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999211061243
Förster, M., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Brückner, S., Happ, R., Hambleton, R. K., Walstad, W. B., Asano, T., & Yamaoka, M. (2015). Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison: Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 223(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000195
Happ, R., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Förster, M. (2018). How prior economic education influences beginning university students’ knowledge of economics. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-018-0066-7
Hasan, M., Arisah, N., Nurdiana, N., Supatminingsih, T., & Nikensari, S. I. (2022). Socioeconomic Status, Individual Modernity, Economic Literacy, and Consumer Rationality of Millennial Generation. Jurnal Economia, 18(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v18i1.38955
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1994). THE NATURE OF MAN*. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00401.x
Kardanova, E., Dementiev, A., Denisov, I., Zueva, I., & Federiakin, D. (2024). Application of the Contemporary Psychometrics for Assessing Economic Literacy. Вопросы Образования / Educational Studies Moscow, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-17846
Kardanova, E., Enchikova, E. S., Shi, H., Johnson, N., Liu, L. O., Mao, L., & Loyalka, P. K. (2015). Constructing Tests that Can Measure and Compare the Maths and Physics Skills of Engineering Students in Russia and China. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2655534
Linacre, J. M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3 (1), 85–106.
Martins, J., & Veiga, L. G. (2020). Undergraduate students’ economic literacy, knowledge of the country’s economic performance and opinions regarding appropriate economic policies. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 11(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2020.110596
Nizam, N. F. B. M., Sieng, L. W., & Sulaiman, N. (2020). Economic Literacy among Students in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2020-1603-04
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2010). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2. ed., [Nachdr.]). Sage Publ.
Reichert-Schlax, J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Happ, R., Yamaoka, M., Asano, T., & Abe, S. (2022). Economic literacy among beginning higher education economics students in Japan and Germany and its socio-demographic influencing factors. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999211057621
Reinhardt, F., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Happ, R., & Nell-Müller, S. (2021). A Multilevel Analysis of Economic Literacy Among International Students: Implications for an International Assessment of Heterogeneous Vulnerable Learner Groups. Journal of International Students, 11(3), 706–722. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v11i3.2718
Smith, E.V. (2001). Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: A Rasch measurement perspective. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2, 281-311.
van der Linden, W. J. (Ed.). (2018). Handbook of item response theory, Volume 1: Models. CRC Press.
Walstad, W. B., Watts, M. W., & Rebeck, K. (2007). Test of understanding in college economics: Examiner’s manual (4th ed). National Council on Economic Education.
Wright, B.D., Stone, M.N. (1979). Best Test Design. Rasch Measurement.– Chicago: Mesa Press.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ekaterina Pavlova, Elena Kardanova, Elena Tarovik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, with ISSN: 0216-1370, is published by the Institute of Education Development and Quality Assurance (LPPMP UNY). Cakrawala Pendidikan has been recently has been re-accredited by Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture decision Number 230/E/KPT/2022 which is valid for five years since enacted on 30 December 2022.
