Online civic engagement through social media: An analysis of twitter big data

Budi Mulyono, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Idrus Affandi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Karim Suryadi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Cecep Darmawan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract


The development of social media and internet networks has stimulated new scientific interest in terms of online civic engagement, resulting in a redefinition of deliberative politics and the public sphere. On the other hand, all aspects of human life today have been translated into big data and recorded in their activities on social media. The shift from using humans as the unit of study to using algorithms creates a new problem for academics in social science. This online civic engagement research aims to find out the topic of discourse for digital citizens in the discourse of moving the nation's capital city (IKN) and what the ideology behind the discourse is by utilizing Twitter big data. This study used a mixed method with a sequential explanatory design type. The quantitative method used is topic modeling with the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) technique, while the qualitative method used is the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) method from Norman Fairclough, who sees language as a practice of power. Findings from the topic modeling analysis revealed that there were four themes in the IKN discourse: agreeing to move the state capital, objecting to move the state capital, supporting the discourse on moving the state capital, and the fourth theme, law and eradication of corruption. From the results of critical discourse analysis, it is known that there is a diametrical division in the IKN issue as a result of identity politics that emerged after the 2014 Presidential Election. In every discussion on the IKN discourse, there is a conflict between Islamic populism and Nationalist-Secular populism.

Keywords


online civic engagement; digital citizenship; social media; big data

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alasadi, S. A., & Bhaya, W. S. (2017). Review of data preprocessing techniques. Journal of Engineering and Applie Sciences (Vol. 12, Issue 16, pp. 4102–4107).

Bennett, W. L., Wells, C., & Freelon, D. (2011). Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 835–856. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01588.x

Bennett, W. L., Wells, C., & Rank, A. (2009). Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age. Citizenship Studies, 13(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020902731116

Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communication of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.

Carnegie, & CIRCLE. (2003). The civic mission of schools.

Carpini, M. X. D. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600050178942

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

Cho, A., Byrne, J., & Pelter, Z. (2020). Digital civic engagement by young people (Issue February). UNICEF Office of Global Insight and Policy Alexander.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publication.

Denning, D. E. (2001). Activism, hacktivism, and cyberterrorism: The internet as a tool for influencing foreign policy. The Computer Security Journal, XVI, 15–35.

Dolan, P., & Brennan, M. (2016). Civic engagement: An overview. In World youth report: Youth civic engagement (pp. 17–24). United Nations Publications.

Ehrlich, T. (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education (American council on education oryx press series on higher Ed) (The ACE series on higher education). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology fragmented ideology. 4462. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Foster, I., Ghani, R., Jarmin, R. S., Kreuter, F., & Lane, J. (2020). Big data and social science: A practical guide to methods and tools. In I. Foster, R. Ghani, R. S. Jarmin, F. Kreuter, & J. Lane (Eds.), Journal of Statistical Software (2nd ed., Vol. 78, Issue Book Review 2). CRC Press/A Chapman & Hall Book. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v078.b02

Gordon, E., Baldwin-Philippi, J., & Balestra, M. (2013). Why we engage: How theories of human behavior contribute to our understanding of civic engagement in a digital era. The Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 21, 1–29.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison notebooks. Quintin Howare and Geofrrey Nowell.

Hadiz, V. R., & Robison, R. (2017). Competing populisms in post-authoritarian Indonesia. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117697475

Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2063–2079. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815577797

Joyce, M. (2010). Introduction: How to think about digital activism. In M. Joyce (Ed.), Digital activism decoded : the new mechanics of change (pp. 1–14). IDEBATE Press.

Kahne, J., Hodgin, E., & Eidman-Aadahl, E. (2016). Redesigning civic education for the digital age: Participatory politics and the pursuit of democratic engagement. Theory and Research in Social Education, 44(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1132646

Kayes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life (1st ed.). St. Martins Press.

Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Jenkins, K., & Jenkins, K. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational portrait.

Kemp, S. (2022). Digital 2022 Indonesia: The Essential guide to the latest connected behaviors (pp. 24–84). Wearesocial Kepios. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-indonesia?msclkid=54849450ac3011eca46cf06ec644a888

Krutka, D. G. (2014). Democratic twittering: While there is not always enough time. Social Education, 78(2), 86–89.

Lin, A. R. (2013). engagement: a review of the research citizenship education in American schools and its role in developing civic engagement : a review of the research. Educational Review, 67(January), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.813440

Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. The MIT Press.

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populsim: A very short introduction. In Populism: A Very Short Intoduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Müller, J.-W. (2019). What is populism? In Populism and Liberal Democracy. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837886.003.0001

Nishishiba, M., Nelson, H. T., Shinn, C., Nishishiba, M., Nelson, H. T., & Shinn, C. W. (2005). Explicating factors that foster civic engagement among students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(4), 269–285.

Papacharissi, Z. A. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. Polity press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.

Ribble, M., Bailey, G., & Ross, T. (2004). Digital citizenship: Addressing appropriate technology behavior. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32, 6–11.

Rumata, V. M. (2016). Peluang dan tantangan big data dalam penelitian ilmu sosial: Sebuah kajian literatur. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 20(2), 155–167.

Schäfer, M. T. (2016). Challenging Citizenship: Social Media and Big Data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 25, 111–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-016-9255-8

Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.

Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2015). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616221

Sunarso, Kuncorowati, P. W., Manik, T. S., & Fathurrahman, A. M. (2022). Elections as a means of citizens political education: A comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1), 129–141.

Suryanto, Widodo, A., & Nursalim. (2018). Pengembangan model pembelajaran berlatar isu kontroversial sebagai penguatan watak kewarganegaraan mahasiswa. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 250–259.

Uldam, J., & Vestergaard, A. (2015). Introduction: Social media and civic engagement. In J. Uldam & A. Vestergaard (Eds.), Civic Engagement and Social Media: Political Participation Beyond Protest (pp. 1–23). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434166

Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(2), 920–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375

Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A., & Jaafar, N. I. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007

Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and changing American Citizen. Oxford University Press.

Zúñiga, H. G. de, & Diehl, T. (2017). Citizenship, social media, and big data: Current and future research in the social sciences. Social Science Computer Review, 35(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315619589




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i1.54201

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Social Media:

     


 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web
analytics
View Our Stats

Flag Counter