Factors influencing students’ motivation towards learning

NorHasnida Che Md Ghazali, Zahari Suppian, Syaza Hazwani Zaini, SitiFazlyana Mat Husin


Students’ motivation towards learning comes from inside of themselves, which seems to be an important factor in determining success. The material and personal needs (input dimension), the teachers’ knowledge and attitude, and challenges faced by the teachers regarding school-based assessment (the process dimension) are considered to influence students’ motivation towards learning. This study was conducted to explore the degree of influence of factors regarding school-based assessment implementation on students’ motivation towards learning. There were 879 teachers selected using a stratified sampling method. The instrument was developed by the researcher following the CIPP evaluation model by Daniel Stufflebeam. The analysis used a two-step approach involving measurement and structural model using structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. Results of the study indicated that the proposed model was supported. Five inter-correlated constructs had good psychometric properties. Out of four constructs, two constructs loaded positively on motivation towards learning. In conclusion, good teachers will engage in improving their knowledge and skills and combat the challenges and hence, improving their practices to continually improve their students’ performance. The findings will give rise to further hypotheses


motivation towards learning; school-based assessment; knowledge on SBA; material and personal needs

Full Text:



Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 principles. Assessment Reform Group.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Earlbum.

Carrillo-de-la-Peña, M. T., Baillès, E., Caseras, X., Martínez, À., Ortet, G., & Pérez, J. (2009). Formative assessment and academic achievement in pre-graduate students of health sciences. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9086-y

Chin, J., Diehl, V., & Norman, K. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. ACM CHIi’.

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). NJL Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.

Dorman, J. P., Fisher, D. L., & G., W. B. (2006). Learning environments, students’ perceptions of assessment, academic efficacy, and attitudes to science: A LISREL analysis. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: world views (pp. 1–28).

Ghazali, C. M., Hasnida, N., Abdullah, Norazilawati, Zaini, Hazwani, S., Hamzah, & Mahizer. (2020). Student teachers’ conception of feedback within an assessment for learning environment: Link to pupil aspiration. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.25483

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900210

Hunt, E., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2002). Issues, examples, and challenges in formative assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.48

Iverson, M. (2012). Advanced language attrition of Spanish in contact with Brazilian Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27341.84962

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of SEM. Guilford Press.

Koh, K., & Velayutham, R. L. (2009). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy in Singapore schools: an analysis of teachers’ assessment tasks and student work. 9.

Leahy, S., & Wiliam, D. (2012). From teachers to schools: Scaling up professional development for formative assessment, 49–71. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n4

Liqiu, W. (2010). Formative assessment: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.838-841

Md, G., & Hasnida, N. (2016). A reliability and validity of an instrument to evaluate the school-based assessment system: A pilot study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i2.4533

Mokshein, S. E., Ishak, H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). The use of rasch measurement model in English testing. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22750

Muhid, N. A. (2012). Pelaksanaan PBS tidak bebankan guru. My Library. Sektor Sumber Teknologi Pendidikan. https://psbtpnsarawak.wordpress.com/2012/10/30/pelaksanaan-pbs-tidak-bebankan-guru/

Mutalib, S. A., & Ahmad, J. (2012). Penggunaan teknik pentaksiran formatif dalam subjek bahasa melayu darjah satu: kajian kes. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 2(1), 17–30. https://spaj.ukm.my/jpbm/index.php/jpbm/issue/view/13

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Window (3rd ed.). Allen and Unwin.

Reyneke, M., Meyer, L., & Nel, C. (2010). School-based assessment: The leash needed to keep the poetic ‘unruly pack of hounds’ effectively in the hunt for learning outcomes. South African Journal of Education, 30(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n2a339

Shabait. (2010). What motivation is and why it is important in classroom situation. Ministry OfInformation. Eritrea. https://shabait.com/2010/10/01/what-motivation-is-and-why-it-is-important-in-classroom-situation/

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Evaluation models: New directions for evaluation. John Wiley and Sons.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Tan, H. Y. (2004). Using formative assessment strategies to aid students’ learning in adult english teaching as foreign language-an experimental study. Captial Normal University Press.

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Xuefeng, W. (2008). Teachers’ views on conducting formative assessment in Chinese context. Engineering Letters, 16.

Zainuddin, A. (2012). A handbook on SEM structural equation modelling (6th ed.). UiTM Kelantan.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.42211


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Social Media:



 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

View Our Stats

Flag Counter