JIGSAW LEARNING STRATEGY IN A DIVERSE SCIENCE-CLASSROOM SETTING: FEASIBILITY, CHALLENGES, AND ADJUSTMENT

Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Fuldiaratman Fuldiaratman, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Fatria Dewi, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Urip Sulistiyo, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Susi Hindarti, Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

Abstract


Jigsaw learning strategy is considered effective in enhancing students’ learning outcomes. Yet, it is problematic for a science classroom that contains educational challenges. The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of the jigsaw learning in science classes in Indonesian classrooms. This included the feasibility of the jigsaw strategy, the challenges that interfered with the implementations, and the necessary approach to fit the strategy with the challenges. A qualitative case study was used. Three chemistry classes (each consisted of 35 grade 11 students) and a chemistry teacher were involved in this study. Data were collected from classroom observations and interviews. The findings showed that jigsaw learning was not fully feasible as it could not be completely implemented in the participating classes. Unsupportive educational settings such as time limitation, large population, the ill-sized classroom, teacher’s lack of participation and the complexity of the jigsaw structure had influenced the lack of success of the implementations. Rather than seeking help from educational supports that normally involves a financial-concern educational policy, this study recommends adjusting the jigsaw structure to increase its feasibility in such learning condition.


Keywords


jigsaw learning; diverse science-classroom setting; feasibility; challenges; adjustment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982.

Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Company.

Artut, P. D., & Tarim, K. (2007). The effectiveness of jigsaw II on prospective elementary school teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660701268551.

Balfakih, N. M. A. (2003). The effectiveness of student team-achievement division (STAD) for teaching high school chemistry in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Science Education, 25(5), 605-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078879.

Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.

Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x.

Colosi, J. C., & Zales, C. R. (1998). Jigsaw cooperative learning improves Biology Lab Courses. BioScience, 48(2), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313137.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed). California, CA: Sage Publication.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.

Doymus, K. (2007). Effects of a cooperative learning strategy on teaching and learning phases of matter and one-component phase diagrams. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(11), 1857-1860. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p1857.

Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., Bakar, A., & Harizon, H. (2020). Skills to argue: Using argument-based learning (AbL) and socio-scientific issues to promote university students’ argumentation skills in chemistry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022042.

Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., Harizon, H., Ngatijo, N., & Mukminin, A. (2019). The inquiry-based teaching instruction (IbTI) in Indonesian secondary education: What makes science teachers successful enact the curriculum? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10263a.

Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., Ngatijo, N., & Sulistiyo, U. (2019). Inquiry-based learning in Indonesia: Portraying supports, situational beliefs, and chemistry teachers’ adoptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(4), 538-553. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.6.

Effendi-Hsb, M. H., Harizon, H., Ngatijo, N., Fuldiaratman, F., & Sulistyo, U. (2019). Promoting Indonesian secondary school students’ argumentation skills in the concept of chemistry reaction-rate: A comparative effect of three cooperative learning strategies. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012143.

Fernandez-Rio, J., Sanz, N., Fernandez-Cando, J., & Santos, L. (2017). Impact of a sustained cooperative learning intervention on student motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1123238.

Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90(3), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20130.

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed). USA: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Halimah, L., & Sukmayadi, V. (2019). The role of “jigsaw” method in enhancing Indonesian prospective teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and communication skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 289-304. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12219a.

Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse Jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211330.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368.

Holliday, D. C. (2002). Jigsaw IV: Using student/teacher concerns to improve jigsaw III. https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED465687.

Jansen, J. D. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(3), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764980280305.

Jansoon, N., Somsook, E., & Coll, R. K. (2008). Thai undergraduate chemistry practical learning experiences using the jigsaw IV method. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 31(2), 178-200.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Leikin, R., & Zaslavsky, O. (1999). Cooperative learning in mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 92(3), 240-246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27970923.

Li, W. (2012). Critical analysis of cooperative learning in Chinese ELT context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(5), 961-966. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.5.961-966.

Maceiras, R., Cancela, A., Urréjola, S., & Sánchez, A. (2011). Experience of cooperative learning in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.518232.

Mengduo, Q., & Xiaoling, J. I. N. (2010). Jigsaw strategy as a cooperative learning technique: Focusing on the language learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 113-125.

Oludipe, D., & Awokoy, J. O. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning teaching strategy on the reduction of students’ anxiety for learning chemistry. Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 30-36. http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/501/431.

Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8.

Perkins, D. V., & Saris, R. N. (2001). A “jigsaw classroom” technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28(2), 111-113. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2802_09.

Permendikbud RI 2018 No. 37. Perubahan atas peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 24 Tahun 2016 tentang kompetensi inti dan kompetensi dasar pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada pendidikan dasar dan pendidikan menengah. [Amandment on the rule of Minister of Education and Culture No 24 Year 2016 about the core competency and basic competency in the Curriculum 2013 at the elementary and secondary education level].

Persky, A. M., & Pollack, G. M. (2009). A hybrid jigsaw approach to teaching renal clearance concepts. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj730349.

Rika, M. Y. (2017). The implementation of jigsaw technique in teaching speaking of the eighth grade students at the second semester of SMP Negeri 1 Krui in 2015/2016 academic year (Undergraduate thesis, UIN Raden Intan Lampung). http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/1376/.

Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning: Student teams, what research says to teachers (2nd ed). Washington, DC: National Education Association.

Stahl, R. (1994). Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Springer.

Tombak, B., & Altun, S. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning: University example. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(64), 173-196. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.10.

Ural, E., Ercan, O., & Gençoğlan, D. M. (2017). The effect of jigsaw technique on 6th graders’ learning of force and motion unit and their science attitudes and motivation. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 1-21. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v18_issue1_files/ural.pdf.

Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah, M. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through remap GI and remap jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.30634

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Social Media:

     


 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web
analytics
View Our Stats

Flag Counter