Eksplorasi kemampuan penalaran dan representasi matematis siswa  sekolah menengah pertama

Absorin Absorin; Sugiman Sugiman

doi:10.21831/pg.v13i2.21249

Eksplorasi kemampuan penalaran dan representasi matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama

Absorin Absorin, SMP Nahdlatul Ulama Wanasari Indramayu, Indonesia
Sugiman Sugiman, Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pg.v13i2.21249

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan matematis, yang terdiri atas kemampuan penalaran dan representasi matematis siswa SMP di Kabupaten Indramayu, Jawa Barat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survei dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa SMP kelas VIII di Kabupaten Indramayu tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 390 siswa. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah stratified random sampling.Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui teknik Tes. Teknik analisis data menggunakan statistika deskriptif melalui dua cara, yaitu estimasi titik dan estimasi interval rata-rata untuk menentukan kategori ketercapaian pada masing-masing kemampuan matematis siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan matematis siswa SMP di Kabupaten Indramayu berada pada kategori sedang. Secara lebih spesifik rata-rata skor pada kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa termasuk dalam kategori sedang. Begitu juga pada rata-rata skor kemampuan representasi matematis siswa berada pada kategori sedang.

Exploration ability of mathematical reasoning and representation of junior high school students

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the mathematical ability, which consists of the ability of mathematical reasoning and representation in junior high school students in Indramayu, West Java Province, Indonesia. This research was using survey method with quantitative approach. The population in this study were all grade VIII students in both state and private junior high schools in Indramayu district in academic year of 2016/2017 and 390 students selected as sample research. The sampling technique was stratified random sampling. Data collected using test technique. Technique data analysis used descriptive statistics through two ways, namely estimation point and the average of interval estimation to determine the category of achievement in each of the students' mathematical abilities. The result showed that the mathematical ability of junior high school students in Indramayu district was in the medium category. More specifically the average score on students' mathematical reasoning abilities was included in the moderate category. Similarly, the average score of students' mathematical representation ability was in the medium category.

Keywords

kemampuan penalaran matematis; komunikasi matematis; representasi matematis; mathematical reasoning; mathematical communication; mathematical representation

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., & Williams, T. A. (2010). Essential of statistics for business and economics (6thed.). Southwestern, TX: Cengage Learning.

Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drweneke, J., & Picard, A. (2013). Reasoning and proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research, 9(46), 1-10.

Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classroom. New York, NY: Springer.

Brumbaugh, D. K., Moch, P. L., & Wilkinson, M. E. (2005). Mathematics content for elementary teachers. Marwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.

Cai, J., Jakabcsin, M. S., & Lane, S. (1996). Assessing students' mathematical communication. School Science and Mathematics, 96(5), 238-246.

Caprioara, D. (2015). Problem solving –purpose and means of learning mathematics in school. Procedia social and behavioural sciences, 191, 1859-1864.

Chambers, P., & Timlinm, R. (2013). Teaching mathematics in the secondary school(2ndEd.). London: SAGE Publications.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.

Dolinar, G. (2014). International Mathematics Olympiade (IMO 2014): Indonesia team result. Retrieved from https://imo-official.org/team_r.aspx?code=IDN&year=2015.

Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., & Leonard, W. J (2004). Solving physics problems with multiple representations. Retrieved from http://www.srri.umass.edu/sites/srri/files/dufresne-1997spp.pdf.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentialsof educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

English, L. D. (2002). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum.

Farhan, M., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Keefektifan PBL dan IBL ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan representasi matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 227-240. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2678

Goldin, G. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, and B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning(pp. 397-430). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Goldin, G. A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 17(2), 137-165.

Goldstein, E. B. (2011). Cognitive psychology: conecting mind, research, and everyday experience. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Eduacational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191-212.

Kalathil, R. R., & Sherin. M. G. (2000). Role of students’ representations in the mathematics classroom. In B. Fihman & S.O’connor-Divelbiss (Eds.). Fourth international conference of learning sience(pp.27-28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 58 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiah.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kennedy, L. M., Tipps, S., & Johnson, A. (2008). Guiding children’s learning of mathematics(11thed.) Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.

Maarif, S. (2016). Improving junior high school students’ mathematical analogical ability using discovery learning method. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1), 114-124.

Moshman, D. (2015). Epistemic cognition and development: The psychology of justification and truth. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international result in mathematics. Philadelphia, PA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standars for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Panasuk, R. M. (2010). Three phase rankin framework for assesing conceptual understanding in algebra using multiple representations. Education, 131(2), 235-257.

Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika IAIN Antasari, 1(2), 33-34.

Salkind, G. M. (2007). Mathematical representation. Retrieved from http://mason.gmu.edu/~gsalkind/portfolio/products/857LitReview.pdf

Schwanke, B. (2008). Reasoning and proof (RAP) Journals: I am here. Research Projects, 36. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidactionresearch/36

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology theory and practice(8thed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Trianto, T. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif: Konsep, landasan, dan implementasinya pada kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana.

Van de Walle, J. A. Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally(7thed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Wardhani, S., & Rumiati, R. (2011). Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v13i2.21249