Perceptions of physical education teachers on obstacles and pedagogy competencies in online learning

Eddy Purnomo, Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan dan Kesehatan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
La Ode Adhi Virama, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Islamic State Institut of Kendari, Indonesia
Francis Ries, University of Seville, Spain
Sinta Naviri, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
Fauzi Fauzi, Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan dan Kesehatan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Abstract


This research aimed to determine the perception of junior high school physical education teachers on obstacles and pedagogical competencies during online learning. Quantitative method supported with a survey approach were used in this research. The research data were analyzed using average value and standard deviation. The data were then compared using MANOVA. The results showed that junior high school physical education teachers perceived all possible obstacles to online learning. Based on the analysis of the average value using the Likert scale on the Google Form questionnaire, it can be ascertained that the highest rank is based on the obstacle factor, namely Absence of Real Time Feedback (M= 2.66; SD= 0.76); Motivation and Commitment (M= 2.46; SD= 0.78); Engaging Student (M= 2.46; SD= 0.70); Flexibility and Delivery Mode (M= 2.37; SD= 0.69); Lack of Feedbacks (M= 2.34; SD= 0.59).  Meanwhile, the results of research on pedagogical competencies showed that in general, physical education teachers in junior high schools had good perceptions of all pedagogical competencies. The MANOVA results showed that there was no significant difference between gender, obstacles, and pedagogical competences of physical education teacher during online learning. The findings categorize the top three barriers perceived by physical education teachers: absence of real time feedback, motivation and commitment, and engaging student. The results of the demographic analysis on gender showed that there were no significant differences between technological factor, individual factor, pedagogical factor, and enabling conditions.


Keywords


Perception, Physical Education Teacher, Obstacles, Pedagogical Competencies, Online Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, S., Uppal, M. A., & Gulliver, S. R. (2018). A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers. Information Technology and People, 31(1), 156–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246

Bawane, J., & Spector, J. M. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910903236536

Bezuidenhout, A. (2018). Analysing the importance-competence gap of distance educators with the increased utilisation of online learning strategies in a developing world context. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3585

Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006

Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott Jr., D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez Jr., A., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., … Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572

Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1–2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3

De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does E-learning policy drive change in higher education?: A case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500046255

Diningrat, S. W. M., Nindya, M. A., & Salwa, S. (2020). Emergency Online Teaching: Early Childhood Education Lecturers’ Perception of Barrier and Pedagogical Competency. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32304

DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R. E., Black, E. W., & Preston, M. (2010). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(3), 10–35.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596

Gilbert, B., John, S., & College, F. (2015). Online Learning Revealing the Benefits and Challenges How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited you ?

Gurley, L. E. (2018). Educators’ preparation to teach, perceived teaching presence, and perceived teaching presence behaviors in blended and online learning environments. Online Learning Journal, 22(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1255

Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Kurnia, S., & Chang, S. (2015). Understanding students’ perceptions of the benefits of online social networking use for teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 26, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.004

Hartini, S., Putra Bhakti, C., Hartanto, D., & Alfarizqi Nizamuddin Ghiffari, M. (2018). Teacher Pedagogic Competency Development Model: A Literature Review. 267(Aecon), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.2991/aecon-18.2018.40

Hernández-Gamboa, J. O., Vera-Rivera, J. L., & Ortega-Parra, A. J. (2019). The pedagogical competences and their importance in virtual physical education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1161(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1161/1/012009

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review, 1–15. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/

Hung, M. L. (2016). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher perceptions. Computers and Education, 94, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.012

Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence – an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4

Jayul, A., & Irwanto, E. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Daring Sebagai Alternatif Proses Kegiatan Belajar Pendidikan Jasmani di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19 Achmad. Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, 6(2), 190–199.

Joe, R. B. (2015). Mapping Relational Models for Online Teacher Preparation and Professional Development. In Exploring Pedagogies for Diverse Learners Online (Vol. 25, pp. 187–207). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720150000027010

Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2019). Competence Measurement in (Mathematics) Teacher Education and Beyond: Implications for Policy. Higher Education Policy, 32(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00139-z

Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C. J., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005

Kizilcec, R. F., & Halawa, S. (2015). Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. L@S 2015 - 2nd ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724680

Koch, L. F. (2014). The nursing educator’s role in e-learning: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 34(11), 1382–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.002

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303

Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern distance learning technologies in higher education: Introduction problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92284

Liakopoulou, M. (2011). The Professional Competence of Teachers : Which qualities , attitudes , skills and knowledge contribute to a teacher ’ s effectiveness ? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(21), 66–78.

Lin, C., & Zheng, B. (2015). Teaching Practices and Teacher Perceptions in Online World Language Courses - Learning & Technology Library (LearnTechLib). Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(3), 275–304. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171055/

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Novianti, N., & Nurlaelawati, I. (2019). Pedagogical Competence Development of University Teachers With Non-Education Background: the Case of a Large University of Education in Indonesia. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.15711

Ntoumanis, N., Quested, E., Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2017). Need-supportive communication: Implications for motivation in sport, exercise, and physical activity. Persuasion and Communication in Sport, Exercise, and Physical Activity, December, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624365

Ogilvie, S. (2013). Words of the world: A global history of the Oxford English Dictionary. Cambridge University Press.

Oster-Levinz, A., & Klieger, A. (2010). Online tasks as a tool to promote teachers’ expertise within the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.024

Paul, J. A., Baker, H. M., & Cochran, J. D. (2012). Effect of online social networking on student academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2117–2127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.016

Pöntinen, S., Dillon, P., & Väisänen, P. (2017). Student teachers’ discourse about digital technologies and transitions between formal and informal learning contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9450-0

Rasmitadila, Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the covid-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388

Saadatmand, M., Uhlin, L., Hedberg, M., Åbjörnsson, L., & Kvarnström, M. (2018). Examining Learners’ Interaction in an Open Online Course Through the Community of Inquiry Framework. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0004

Srichanyachon, N. (2014). The barriers and needs of online learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.08799

Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should Teachers be Trained in Emergency Remote Teaching? Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.

Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005

Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779

World Bank. (2020). Guidance Note : Remote Learning & COVID-19. 19(April), 1–4.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v19i2.64162

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpji.

Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia Stats