Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pendidikan Jasmani Sebagai Hasil Determinan Dalam Gaya Mengajar

Sri Mawarti, Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No. 1 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nur Azis Rohmansyah, Fakults IPS dan Keolahragaan, Unversitas PGRI Semarang, Jl Gajah Raya No. 16, Semarang, Indonesia
Ashira Hiruntrakul, Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies, Khon Kaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittraphap Rd., Thailand

Abstract


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menyelidiki efek gaya mengajar berpusat pada guru dibandingkan dengan gaya mengajar yang berpusat pada siswa pada respon motivasi kognitif dan afektif siswa dalam pelajaran pendidikan jasmani. Empat guru mengajar sembilan puluh dua siswa yang direkam dengan menggunakan gaya mengajar yang berbeda-beda mengadopsi dari Mosston dan Ashworth yaitu gaya komando, gaya resiprokal, dan gaya penemuan terbimbing. Sistem pengkodean yang diadopsi dari Ames digunakan untuk mengukur gaya mengajar. Tanggapan kognitif dan afektif siswa diukur dalam kelompok. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa gaya penemuan terbimbing dan timbal balik lebih baik dalam hal penguasaan dan perilaku dalam mengajar yang kurang focus serta tanggapan kognitif dan afektif dari siswa yang lebih baik dari pada gaya komando.

 

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of teacher-centered teaching versus student-centered teaching styles on students' cognitive and affective motivational responses in physical education lessons. Four teachers taught ninety-two students who recorded using different teaching styles adopted from Mosston and Ashworth namely the command style, reciprocal style, and guided discovery style. The coding system adopted from Ames is used to measure teaching style. Students' cognitive and affective responses were measured in groups. The results showed that the guided and reciprocal discovery style was better in terms of mastery and less focused teaching behavior and the students' cognitive and affective responses were better than the command style.


Keywords


learning motivation, physical education, teaching styles

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aktop & Karahan. (2012). Physical education teacher’s views of effective teaching methods in physical education. Procedia-Sosial and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1910-13

Amado et al. (2019). Associations between Self-Determined Motivation, Team Potency and Self-Talk in Team Sports. Journal of Human Kinetics, 70(1), 245-59

Ardian, A., Purwanto, S., & Alfarisi, D. (2019). Hubungan prestasi belajar siswa kelas khusus olahraga dengan kecerdasan emosional. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 7(2), 126-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v7i2.28103

Arias-Estero et al. (2020). Effects of two TGFU lessons period on game performance, knowledge and psychosocial variables in elementary physical education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10).

Artha et al. (2020). The application of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Teaching Game for Understanding (TGfU) Learning Models on Learning Motivation and volley Ball Passing Skills. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(1), 46-53.

Bailey, R. (2013). Teaching Physical Education: A Handbook for Primary and Secondary School Teachers (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042466

Barnet et al. (2013). Adolescents perception of the relationship between movement skills, physical activity and sport. Eurpoean Physical Education Review, 19(2), 271-85

Batez et al. (2021). Effects of teaching program based on teaching games for understanding model on volleyball skills and enjoyment in secondary school students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 606.

Calabria-Lopes et al. (2019). Teaching games for Understanding in basketball camp: The impact on process and product performance. RICYDE: Revista Internaticional de Cieencias del Deporte, 15(56).

Casado-Robles et al. (2020). Is sport education model effective in improving sportsmanship and physical education activity in students? RICYDE: Revista Internaticional de Cieencias del Deporte, 16(60).

Chinanapan et al. (2021). Teaching methods used by tamil school physical education teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(7), 978-83.

Chu and Zhang. (2018). Motivational processes in Sport Education programs among high school students: A systematic review. European Physical Education Review, 24(3).

Corbin, C. B. (2002). Physical activity for everyone: What every physical educator should know about promoting lifelong physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21(2), 128-44.

Diaz-Cueto et al. (2010). Teaching games for understanding to in service physical education teachers: Rewards and barriers regarding the changing model of teaching sport. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(4), 378-98

Duda, J. L. (2007). Motivation in sport settings: A goal perspective approach. In D. Smith & M. Bar-Eli (eds.), Essential reading in sport and exercise psychology (pp.78-93). Champaign, IL: Human kinetics Publishers.

Escartí, A. & Gutiérrez, M. (2001). Influence of the motivational climate in physical education on the intention to practice physical activity or sport. European Journal of Sport ScienceI, 1, 1-12. doi:10.1080/17461390100071406

Firmansyah, H. (2011). Hubungan Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa Dengan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 6(1), 41-42.

Garcia-Gonzales et al. (2020). Can a hybrid sport education/teaching games for understanding volleyball unit be more effective in less motivated students? An examination into a set of motivation related variables. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 6170.

Gil-Arias et al. (2021). A hybrid tgfu/se volleyball teaching unit for enhancing motivation in physical education: A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1).

Gustian, U., Supriatna, E., & Purnomo, E. (2019). Efektifitas modifikasi permainan tradisional dalam pengembangan physical literacy anak taman kanak-kanak. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 7(1), 23-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v7i1.22166

Hastie & Casey. (2014). Fidelity in models based practice research in sport pedagogy: A guide for future investigations. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(3), 422-31.

Hendri & Aziz. (2020). Motivasi siswa dalam proses pembelajaran Pendidikan jasmani olahraga Kesehatan. Jurnal Patriot, 2(1).

Karlefors & Larsson. (2018). Teaching methods in Swedia physical education in Swedish physical education. Scandinavian Sport Studies Forum, 9, 25-44

Knowles et al. (2018). Exploring the synergy between sport education and on school sport participation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(2), 1-33

Parish, L. E. & Treasure, D. C. (2003). Physical activity and situational motivation in physical education: Influence of the motivational climate and perceived ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(2), 173-182. doi:10.1080/02701367.2003.10609079

Riyadi, DN. (2017). Pengaruh gaya mengajar dan motivasi belajar terhadap keterampilan servis atas bola voli. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 31(1), 13.

Rohmansyah, N. A. (2017). Hubungan kegairahan (arousal) dengan performa olahraga. Jendela OlahragaI, 2(2),59-69. doi:10.26877/jo.v2i2.1703

Rohmansyah, N. A. (2018). Manajemen Pengembangan Kompetensi Profesional Guru Pendidikan Jasmani Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Negeri di Kota Yogyakarta. JOSSAE : Journal of Sport Science and Education, 3(1), 47-54. doi:10.26740/jossae.v3n1.p47-54

Spray, C. (2002). Motivational Climate and Perceived Strategies to Sustain Pupilsí Discipline in Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 89(1), 5-20. doi:10.1177/1356336X020081001

Suherman, A. (2014). Pengembangan model program pelatihan profesi untuk meningkatkan kompetensi pedagogis mahasiswa pgsd penjas. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 33(1), 138-146 doi:10.21831/cp.v1i1.1870




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v18i1.48119

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpji.

Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia Stats