Email this article 
Analisis instrumen ujian formatif mata pelajaran pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan kesehatan tingkat SMP
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui cakupan dan kualitas instrumen ujian formatif mata pelajaran Penjasorkes dilihat dari aspek kognitif dan psikomotor. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif. Ada 2 jenis instrumen digunakan, yakni soal essay dan soal ujian praktik. Kualitas soal essay dan soal unjuk kerja dilihat dari validitas isi dengan menggunakan formula Aiken, hasil estimasi reliabilitasnya menggunakan koefesien Alpha dan Cronbach ICC. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan dari 12 sekolah, 9 sekolah memiliki instrumen lengkap, yakni kompetensi kognitif dan psikomotor. Selanjutnya, dapat dijelaskan sebagai berikut: (1) ada 2 sekolah tidak memiliki soal essay, karena mengutamakan praktik. (2) ada 1 sekolah tidak memiliki soal praktik, karena tidak memiliki lapangan. Karakteristik soal ujian formatif mata pelajaran Penjasorkes, yaitu: (1) soal essay 9 sekolah memiliki indeks Aiken tergolong baik, dan soal 1 sekolah memiliki indeks Aiken tidak baik; (2) soal essay memiliki tingkat kesukaran sedang dengan reliabilitas tidak memenuhi syarat; (3) soal praktik 11 sekolah memiliki indeks Aiken tergolong baik dengan reliabilitas 9 sekolah tidak memenuhi syarat, dan reliabilitas 2 sekolah memenuhi syarat.
Kata Kunci: instrumen, ujian formatif, deskriptif kualitatif dan kuantitatif.
Ananalysis of Formative Test Instruments for Subjects of Physical Education and Health Among Junior High School
Abstract
This study aims to determine the scope and quality test instruments for Subjects of Physical Education and Health seen formative subjects of cognitive and psychomotor aspects. This research is descriptive. There are 2 types of instruments are used, the essay and exam practice. Quality of essay questions and problems of performance seen from the content validity by the formula Aiken, reliability estimation results of coefficient Alpha and ICC. The result showed from 12 schools, 9 school has a complete instrument, namely the cognitive and psychomotor competency. Furthermore, it can be described as follows: (1) there are two schools which do not have the essay, because the two schools prioritize learning practice. (2) there is one school which has no practical matter, because the school does not have a field facility, because it does not have a field. Characteristics exam for Subjects of Physical Education and Health formative subjects, namely: (1) essay 9 school has an index of Aiken classified is good, and about 1 school has an index of Aiken is not good; (2) The essay has a moderate level of difficulty with reliability ineligible; (3) about the practices of 11 schools have relatively good index of Aiken with reliability 9 schools were not eligible, and the reliability of two schools qualify.
Keywords
Full Text:
FULLTEXT PDFReferences
Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Azwar.S., (2015). Dasar-dasar Psikometri. Ed. II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar.S., (2014). Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Ed. IV. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Budiwanto.S., (2003). Prosedur menyusun tes keterampilan olahraga. Jurnal IPTEK Olahraga, Volume 5 Nomor 2 Mei 2003, 133-150.
Bell, B., & Cowie B. (2002). Formative assessment and science education. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Bompa, T.O. (1994). Theory and methodology of training (Terjemahan). Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pajajaran Bandung.
Brennan. (2006). Educational Measurement. Westpost: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Carroll.B., (1994). Assessment in Physical Education: A Teacher’s Guide to the Issues. Washington, D.C: The Falmer Press.
Coll, C., Rochera, M.J., Mayordomo, R.M., et al. (2007). Continuous assessment and support for learning: an experience in educational innovation with ICT support in higher education [Versi elektronik]. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, N. 13 Vol 5(3), 783-804.
Ebel, R.K & Frisbie, D.A. (1986). Essensial of educational measurement (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
Guskey, T.R. (1999). Using assessment to improve student learning. National conference on standards and assessment. Alberta Assessment Consortium. Diambil dari http://www.aac.ab.ca/aboutqa.html.
Grifin, P. & Nix, P. (1991). Educational assessment and reporting: A new approach. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (Australia).
Gronlund, N.E & Linn, R.L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching 6th edition. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Hamalik.O., (2003). Manajemen belajar di perguruan tinggi: pendekatan kredit semester (sks). Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Husdarta, (2011). Manajemen Pendidikan Jasmani. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Hoy, W.K & Miskel, C.G. (2001). Educational administration: theory, research, and practice (6th ed.). United States: School Management and Organization.
Kiefer, K. (2010). A definition of evaluation. Colorado State University. Diambil dari http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/processes/evaluate/pop2a.cfm.
Linn, R.L. & Miller, M.D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). New Delhi: Pearson Education, Inc.
Luxenburg, F.C. & Ornstein, A.C. (1998). Educational administration: concepts and practices (3rd ed). United States: School Management and Organization.
Mardapi.D., (2012). Pengukuran penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Media.
Mardapi.D., (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Tes & Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Press.
Mardapi.D., (2004). Pengembangan sistem penilaian berbasis kompetensi. Disampaikan pada Seminar HEPI “Rekayasa Sistem Penilaian untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan” Yogyakarta 26-27 Maret 2004.
Miller, D.K. (2002). Measurement by the physical educator 4th edition. San Fransisco: McGraww Hill.
Morrow, J.R; Jackson, A.W; Disch, J.G; dan Mood, D.P., (2005). Measurement and Evaluation in Human Performance. 3rd Edition USA: Human Kinetics.
Popham, W.J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria: Association of supervision and curriculum development (ASCD).
Rahayu.E.T., (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani: Implementasi pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Safrit, M.J & Wood, T.M. (1989). Measurement concept in physical education and exercise science. Illionois: Human Kinetics Books.
Sudjana.N., (2014). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sukirman, H. dkk (1998). Administrasi dan supervise pendidikan. Yogyakarta: IKIP Yogyakarta.
Sodikun, I. (2004). Pengembangan sistem penilaian hasil belajar keterampilan gerak. Disampaikan pada seminar HEPI “Rekayasa Sistem Penilaian dalam rangka Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan” Yogyakarta 26-27 Maret 2004.
Thomas, J.R., & Nelson, J. Krecthmar. (1990). Methods research in physical activity (2 nd ed). New Jersey: Human Kinetics Publisher.
Usman, H. (2008). Manajemen: teori, praktik, dan riset pendidikan (edisi kedua). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wahjoedi. (2000). Landasan Evaluasi Pendidikan Jasmani. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wright. R.J., (2008). Educational Assessment: Test and Measurements in the Age of Accountability. California: Widener University, Sage Publication.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v13i2.20989
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpji.