MODEL EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN AKIDAH DAN AKHLAK DI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH (MTs)

Darodjat Darodjat; Darmiyati Zuchdi

doi:10.21831/pep.v20i1.7517

MODEL EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN AKIDAH DAN AKHLAK DI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH (MTs)

Darodjat Darodjat, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo, Indonesia
Darmiyati Zuchdi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v20i1.7517

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) menghasilkan model evaluasi pembelajaran Akidah dan Akhlak di MTs, (2) menghasilkan instrumen evaluasi yang memiliki reliabilitas dan validitas, (3) mengetahui kelayakan Model Logik Evaluasi Pembelajaran Akidah dan Akhlak (MLEPAA). Penelitian ini menggunakan model Borg dan Gall. Teknik penentuan subjek penelitian untuk unit analisis siswa dengan simple random sampling sejumlah 330 siswa dari tiga MTsN di Kabupaten Banyumas, 3 orang Guru Akidah dan Akhlak, dan 3 orang Kepala MTsN. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah: kuesioner, tes, dan penilaian antarteman. Validitas instrumen meliputi face validity dan content validity, dianalisis dengan expert judgment, validasi konstruk dianalisis dengan konfirmatori faktor analisis (CFA), sedangkan instrumen tes dianalisis dengan bantuan program ITEMAN. Estimasi reliabilitas instrumen menggunakan formula Alpha Cronbach dan reliabilitas interrater menggunakan Cohens’ Kappa dengan program SPSS for Window 16.0. Simpulan penelitian: pertama, model evaluasi yang dihasilkan (MLEPAA) mencakup empat komponen utama, yaitu: input, activities, output, dan outcomes. Kedua, hasil analisis dengan CFA diperoleh indeks: (1) ρ-value > 0,05; (2) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0,8; dan (3) Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) < 0,90. Ketiga, instrumen yang dikembangkan memenuhi validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik. Keempat, berdasarkan penilaian user, MLEPAA layak digunakan.

Kata kunci: model logik, evaluasi pembelajaran Akidah dan Akhlak, MTs

AKIDAH AND AKHLAK LEARNING EVALUATION MODEL IN THE MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH

Abstract

This study aimed to: (1) develop an evaluation model on Akidah Akhlak subject of Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs), (2) generate some instruments of evaluation which have validity and reliability, (3) know a worthiness model evaluation of Akidah Akhlak subject in implementation. This study was a research and development of Borg and Gall model. The subjects were determined by simple random sampling which consisted of 330 students, 3 teachers, and 3 principles in three public Madrasah Tsanawiyah in Banyumas regencies. The data gathering techniques used were questionnaires, tests, and peer assessment. The instrument validation process was carried out in terms of the face validity and content validity through expert judgment, the construct validity through the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and test by using ITEMAN program. The instrument reliability was analyzed using the Cronbach's Alpha technique, and inter-rater reliability was assessed using SPSS for Window 16.0. with Cohens' Kappa technique. The results of the research were as follows: firstly, the components of MLEPAA evaluation model consisted of input, activities, output, and outcomes. Secondly, the results of CFA analysis were as follows: (a) Chi-Square, p > 0.05, the acquired value is= 553.72, (b) Goodness of Fit Indices (GFI) must be 0 to 1, the acquired value is = 0.892, and (c) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0.05, the acquired value is = 0.000. Thirdly, instrument utilized in research had fulfilled reliability and validity. Fourth, based on assessment from user, the MLEPAA was suitable for using in MTs.

Keywords: logic model, Akidah Akhlak learning evaluation, MTs

Keywords

model logik; evaluasi pembelajaran Akidah Akhlak; MTs; logic model; Akidah Akhlak learning evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Abrasyi, M.A. (1993). Dasar-dasar pokok pendidikan Islam. (Terjemahan Bustami A.Gani & Johar Bahri). Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Assegaf, A. (2001). Memahami sumber konflik antariman. Dalam TH. Sumartana (Eds.), Pluralisme, konflik dan pendidikan agama di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Dian Interfidei.

Azwar, S. (2005). Sikap manusia: Teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Barber, B. K., & Olsen, J. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 3–30.

Bickman, L. (Ed.). (1987). The functions of program theory. New Directions in Program Evaluation: Using Program Theory in Evaluation.

Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction. (4th ed.) New York: Longman.

Cennamo, K., & Kalk, D. (2005). Real world instructional design. Canada: Thomson Learning, Inc.

Chazan, B., & Soltis, J.F. (1975). Moral Education. New York: Teacher College Press.

Eye, A.V. & Mun, E.Y. (2005). Analyzing rater agreement (Manifest variable methods). Marwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Fadjar, A.M. (1998). Madrasah dan tantangan modernitas. Bandung: Mizan.

Fernandez, H.J.X (1984). Testing and measurement. Jakarta: National Educational and Curriculum Development.

Ghozali, I. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Teori, konsep dan aplikasinya dengan program Lisrel 8.80 (Edisi II). Semarang: Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Volume 20, Nomor 1, Juni 2016 Model Evaluasi Pembelajaran Akidah dan Akhlak di ... − Darodjat, Darmiyati Zuchdi, Zamroni 25 Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Griffin, P., & Nix, P. (1991). Educational assessment and reporting. Sydney: Harcout Brace Javanovich, Publisher.

Gould, M.S., Greenberg, T., Velting, D., & Shaffer, D. (2003). Youth suicide risk and preventive interventions: A review of the past 10 years. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42, 386–405.

Heneret, E., & Powel, E.T. (2008). Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

Keller, J.M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2 (4), 26-34.

Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivation design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Keller, J.M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10 (3), 2-10.

Kellogg, W.K. Foundation. (2004). Using logic models to bring planning, evaluation, and action. Diambil pada tanggal 10 Juli 2012, dari http://www.wkkf.org.

Kerr, M., et.al. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 20(1), 39–64, 2010.

La Greca, A.M., & Hannah Moore Harrison, H.M. (2005). Adolescent peer relations, friendships, and romantic relationships: Do they predict social anxiety and depression?. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34 (1), 49–61.

LeBlanc, L., et.al. (2008). High school social climate and antisocial behavior: A 10 year longitudinal and multilevel study. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 18 (3), 395–419.

Mardapi, D. (2007). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia.

Mastuhu. (1999). Memberdayakan sistem pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Logos.

McLaughlin, J.A., & Jordan, G.B. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your programs Performance Story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 65-72.

McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Miskawaih, I. (1999). Menuju kesempurnaan akhlak (Cetakan V). (Terjemahan Helmi Hidayat). Libanon: Darulkutub al-„Ilmiyyah. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1985).

Newman, B. M., et.al. (2007). The relationship of social support to depressive symptoms during the transition to high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 42, 441–459.

Nunally, J.C. (1981). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.

Peraturan Menteri Agama RI No. 2 tahun 2008 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan dan Standar Isi. Diambil pada tanggal 12 Juli 2011, dari http://www.scribd.com/doc/57115839/Peraturan-Menteri-Agama-Republik-Indonesia.

Porteous, N.L., et al. (2002). Introducing program team to logic models: Facilitating the learning process. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. Vol. 17, No. 3, 113-141.

Powell, T., & Heneret, E. (2008). Enhancing program performance with logic models. Diakses tanggal 15 November 2011 dari Wisconsin Extension Website: Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan26− Volume 20, Nomor 1, Juni 2016http://www.UWEX/edu.ces/pdande/

Rahman, F. (1985). Approach to Islam in religious studies review essays. Dalam Richard C. Martin (Ed.). Approaches to Islam in religious studies. Tuscon: The University of Arizona.

Schunk, D.H., Pintrich, P.R., & Meece, J.L. (2010). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application (3nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River.

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology theory and practice (8thed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Sudijono, A. (2003). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zuchdi, D. (2010). Humanisasi pendidikan: Menemukan kembali pendidikan yang manusiawi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Zuchdi, D. et al. (2011). Laporan Penelitian Hibah Penelitian Tim Pascasarjana-HPTP (Hibah Pasca). Pengembangan model pendidikan karakter dengan pendekatan komprehensif terpadu dalam pembelajaran bahasa indonesia, IPA, dan IPS di Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i1.7517