Developing assessment instrument of qirāatul kutub at islamic boarding school

Ajeng Wahyuni; Badrun Kartowagiran

doi:10.21831/pep.v22i2.16592

Developing assessment instrument of qirāatul kutub at islamic boarding school

Ajeng Wahyuni, Pondok Pesantren Al-Amin Seputih Banyak, Lampung, Indonesia
Badrun Kartowagiran, Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v22i2.16592

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and describe the quality and characteristics of an assessment instrument of by name of Qirāatul Kutub. This development research is based on Borg & Gall model. The steps of the development were (1) planning, (2) primary developing product, (3) preliminary field testing, (4) main field testing, and (5) final product revision. The subjects for preliminary field testing were 28 testees for performance test instrument and 96 testees for grammar mastery test derived from students of Darul Huda Islamic Boarding School, whereas the subjects for main field testing were 80 students for performance test instrument and 425 students for grammar mastery test. The research instruments were assessment instrument of Qirāatul Kutub which consisted of performance assessment instrument and grammar mastery essay test, observation and interview guide. The research data were analyzed based on Rasch Model. The results showed that: (1) the results of the development were 12 items of the performance test and 17 items of the grammar mastery test which were fit with the proposed model, (2) the item difficulty of the performance test ranged from -1.32 to 0.99, while for the grammar mastery test from -1.13 to 1.01; (3) the person reliability for the performance test was 0.86, item reliability was 0.97, and Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.97. The grammar mastery test has person reliability 0.97 and item reliability 0.99 with Cronbach’s alpha 0.90; (4) based on the test information function (TIF) and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM), the instruments were found to be good; the performance test and the grammar mastery test were suitable for learners with ability masteries between -4 and 4.

Keywords

qirāatul kutub; tarkib; assessment instrument; Islamic boarding school

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Al-Hasyimi, A. (1971). Qowaidh al-asaasiyah li al-lughah al-’arabiyah. Beirut: Dar Al-Kotob Al-Ilmiyah.

Arifin, Z. (2012). Perkembangan pesantren di Indonesia. Pendidikan Agama Islam, IX(1), 40–53.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: an introduction(4th ed.). New York: Longman.

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (2003). Pondok pesantren dan madrasah diniyah: pertumbuhan dan perkembangannya. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Kelembagaan Agama Islam.

Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt211m.htm

Iskandarwassid, I., & Sunendar, D. (2015). Startegi pembelajaran bahasa. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Linacre, J. M. (2011). User’s guide to Winsteps Ministeps Rasch-Model computer programs. Retrieved from https://www.winsteps.com/winman/copyright.htm

Mardapi, D., &Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur hasil belajar nirbias dan terskala baku. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326–341. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/1100

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Educational assessment of students. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2001). Penilaian dalam pengajaran bahasa dan sastra Indonesia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Pada, A. U. T., Kartowagiran, B., & Subali, B. (2016). Separation index and fit items of creative thinking skills assessment. Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8260

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan RASCH pada assessment pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata.

Veenendaal, N. J., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). What oral text reading fluency can reveal about reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12024

Wagiran. (2015). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.

Wekke, I. S. (2015). Antara tradisionalisme dan kemodernan: Pembelajaran bahasa Arab madrasah minoritas muslim Papua Barat. Tsaqafah, 11(2), 313–332.

Wheeler, R., Cartwright, K. B., & Swords, R. (2012). Factoring AAVE into reading assessment and instruction. Reading Teacher, 65(6), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01063

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.16592