Factor analysis to identify the dimension of Test of English Proficiency (TOEP) in the listening section
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i1.4897Keywords:
dimension, TOEP, listeningAbstract
References
Ackerman, T. A., et al. (2003). Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychological tests. Educational Measurement, 22, pp. 37-53.
Anonymous. (2001). Factor analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10 (1&2), pp. 75-82. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bolt, D. M. (2001). Conditional covariancebased representation of multidimensional test structure. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol.
, No. 3, pp. 244-257.
Bolt, D. M. & Lall, V. M. (2003). Estimation of compensatory and noncompensatory multidimensional item response models using Marcov
chain Monte-Carlo. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, pp. 395-414.
De la Torre, J. & Patz. (2005). Making the most of what we have: A practical application of multidimensional item response theory in scoring. Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30, pp. 295-311.
Garson, D. (2006). Factor analysis. Retrieved on 24 September 2006 from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/index.htm .
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamental of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication Inc.
Hullin, C. L., et al. (1983). Item response theory: Application to psychological measurement. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
Joreskog, K. & Sorbom, D. (1993). Lisrel88: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Scientific Software International.
Kirisci, L., Hsu, T. & Yu, L. (2001). Robustness of item parameter
estimation programs to assumtions of unidimensionality and normality. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, pp. 146-162.
Munby, J. (1981). Communicative syllabus design: A sociolinguistic model for defining the content of purpose-specific language
programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Sireci, S. G., & Geisinger, K. F. (1995). Using subject-matter experts to
assess content representation: An MDS analysis. Applied Psychological
Measurement. Vol. 19. No. 3, pp. 241-255.
Stapleton. (1997). Basic concepts and procedures of confirmatory factor analysis. Retrieved on 25 September 2006 from http://ericae.net/ft/Cfa.HTM
Van de Geer, J. P. (1971). Introduction to multivariate analysis for the social sciences. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Wang, W. C., Chen, P. H., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2004). Improving measurement precission of test batteries using multidimensional item response models. Psychological Methods, Vol 9, No. 1, pp. 116-136.
Wells, C. S. & Purwono, U. 2009. Assesing the fit of IRT models to item response data. Makalah Pelatihan Psikometri Kerjasama Pascasarjana UNY dengan USAID.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
The authors submitting a manuscript to this journal agree that, if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the submission shall be assigned to REID (Research and Evaluation in Education). However, even though the journal asks for a copyright transfer, the authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights.
The copyright transfer agreement form can be downloaded here: [REID Copyright Transfer Agreement Form]
The copyright form should be signed originally and sent to the Editorial Office through email to reid.ppsuny@uny.ac.id
REID (Research and Evaluation in Education) by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.