Interaction and language development through group work: Indonesian EFL learners’ perspectives at an Australian university

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v13i1.95128

Keywords:

Indonesian EFL learners, small-group interaction, study abroad, peer feedback, perceived language development

Abstract

This study investigates how Indonesian EFL learners are supported by group work interactions during study abroad at an Australian university. The study employed a descriptive qualitative design, driven by the Interaction Hypothesis, the Output Hypothesis, and Sociocultural Theory. Data were collected from a questionnaire completed by 15 graduate students. The questionnaire consisted of 19 Likert items and three open-ended questions addressing performance, learning opportunities, and language comprehension. Open-ended responses were discussed qualitatively with little inference, while Likert-type results were summarized descriptively. Regular group work increased speaking opportunities, enhanced lexical acquisition through peer modeling and simple explanations, and encouraged metacognitive regulation, as well as boosting communicative confidence. However, perceived gains in complexity and accuracy were inconsistent, reflecting differing perspectives on corrective feedback, unequal psychological safety, and challenges arising from peer dominance and peer grouping. Maximum benefits may be obtained when roles equalize access to task scope, tasks require joint approval, feedback is delivered through self-respect-preserving scripts, brief planning–monitoring–evaluation checkpoints are inserted, and peer networks extend beyond nationality-based circles. This study explains how peer interactions are transformed by modified input, encouraged output, and mediated participation in a multilingual and multicultural higher education environment by centering lived experiences and identifying sociocultural moderators.

References

Abbasi, I. A., & Anthony, E. (2024). Group work as a contributing factor for language use and oral fluency in the EFL classroom. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6669

Al Awlaqi, H. A. S. M., & Ghozali, I. (2023). Is oral communication apprehension reasonable? A study on sociocultural factors among Indonesian EFL learners. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 5(3), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v5i3.16634

Alfares, N. (2017). Benefits and difficulties of learning in group work in EFL classes in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(7), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p247

Alwahaby, H., Cukurova, M., Papamitsiou, Z., & Giannakos, M. (2022). The evidence of impact and ethical considerations of multimodal learning analytics: A systematic literature review. In M. Giannakos, D. Spikol, D. Di Mitri, K. Sharma, X. Ochoa, & R. Hammad (Eds.), The multimodal learning analytics handbook (pp. 289–325). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08076-0_12

Amalina, N., & Musthafa, B. (2022). A poetic inquiry into an EFL learner’s identity and study abroad experience in a non-English speaking country. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 21(3), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v21i3.41368

Budzińska, K. (2024). Peer interactions in English as a lingua franca: Evaluation of a short teenage study-abroad programme in a multilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2024.2420232

Carhill–Poza, A. (2015). Opportunities and outcomes: The role of peers in developing the oral academic English proficiency of adolescent English learners. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 678–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12271

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2014). Theories in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 194–220). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203628942

González Reséndez, M. L. (2024). A comparative study of discussions, debates, and oral presentations in enhancing EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Open Journal for Educational Research, 8(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojer.0801.03027g

Gor, K., & Long, M. H. (2009). Input and second language processing. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 445–472). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Hanifa, R. (2018). Factors generating anxiety when learning EFL speaking skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i2.10932

Hanifa, R., Yusuf, F. N., Yusra, S. R., & Suherdi, D. (2024). Adapting EFL materials and their influence on Indonesian secondary school students’ language learning. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00297-7

Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Heinzmann, S., Hilbe, R., Ehrsam, K., & Bleichenbacher, L. (2024). Study abroad students’ social contacts in different linguistic contexts and their relationship with English use and development. Language Learning, 74(2), 24–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12674

Ilmi, A. B. I., & Degaf, A. (2024). Cross-cultural insights into phatic communication: Indonesian and Australian student interactions. Deskripsi Bahasa, 7(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.22146/db.9966

Jeanneau, C., & O’Riordan, S. (2015). Peer-led discussion groups in foreign languages: Training international students to become peer-facilitators. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 6(4), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.37237/060411

Jin, L. (2014). Peer/group interaction in a Mandarin Chinese study abroad context. In Z. Han (Ed.), Second language acquisition of Chinese: A series of empirical studies (pp. 57–79). Multilingual Matters.

Kurniawan, H. (2024). Navigating communication challenges in using English as a lingua franca: The stories of Indonesian students in Australia. Lexicon, 11(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v11i1.95829

Kusuma, I. P. I. (2021). Speaking issues faced by Indonesian students during classroom discussions in the US. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 18(1), 5–17.

Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

Li, X., & Hu, W. (2024). Peer versus teacher corrections through electronic learning communities and face-to-face classroom interactions and EFL learners’ passion for learning, speaking fluency, and accuracy. Heliyon, 10(4), e25849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25849

Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Nair, E., Bernardo, A. B. I., & Prasetya, P. H. (2009). Cultural factors relevant to secondary school students in Australia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Indonesia: Relative differences and congruencies. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 19(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.19.2.161

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

Mitchell, R. (2023). Documenting L2 input and interaction during study abroad: Approaches, instruments, and challenges. Second Language Research, 39(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211030626

Nanda, D. W. (2019). Is the study abroad (SA) program important for Indonesian students? English Language Teaching, 12(8), 69. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n8p69

Nastiti, R. (2023). Foreign language anxiety in and outside the classroom: A case of a non-native speaking student living abroad. LingTera, 10(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v10i1.59884

Nhan, L. K. (2024). Exploring students’ perceptions of peer interaction in developing English speaking skills. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(9), 2333–2343. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1094

Nurfitriana, L., Ping, M. T., & Asih, Y. U. (2024). Academic and social challenges faced by undergraduate EFL students in a non-English-speaking country: Lessons learned from the Indonesian International Student Mobility Awards (IISMA) program. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 14(2), 726–755. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v14i2.8892

Octavina, C., Khairunnisa, F., Lestari, T. P., Silvhiany, S., Mirizon, S., Ernalida, E., & Purnomo, M. E. (2025). Bridging cultures: Innovative adaptation strategies of Indonesian students navigating academic and social challenges in the United States. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 10(1), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.10.1.140-159

Paradowski, M. B., Jarynowski, A., Czopek, K., & Jelińska, M. (2021). Peer interactions and second language learning: The contributions of social network analysis in study abroad versus at-home environments. In R. Mitchell & H. Tyne (Eds.), Language, mobility and study abroad in the contemporary European context (pp. 99–116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087953-8

Resch, K., & Amorim, J. P. (2021). Facilitating intercultural encounters with international students: A contribution to inclusion and social network formation. Social Inclusion, 9(3), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i3.4084

Rochma, A. F., Suharso, S., Sudiyono, S., & Fitriana, R. (2024). Implementation of a peer-assessment system in speaking courses. LingTera, 11(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v11i2.76154

Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x

Shih, H. J., & Huang, S. C. (2020). College students’ metacognitive strategy use in an EFL flipped classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 755–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1590420

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer–peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(4), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605

Widyastuti, S. (2023). Subtle othering in EFL group work. Diksi, 31(2), 182–192.

Xu, J., Fan, Y., & Xu, Q. (2019). EFL learners’ corrective feedback decision-making in task-based peer interaction. Language Awareness, 28(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1668003

Yang, J.-S. (2016). The effectiveness of study abroad on second language learning: A meta-analysis. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(1), 66–94. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2344

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

[1]
Yusra, S.R. et al. 2026. Interaction and language development through group work: Indonesian EFL learners’ perspectives at an Australian university. LingTera. 13, 1 (May 2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v13i1.95128.

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.