Developing content and language integrated English speaking materials for accounting students

 Dominique Savio Nsengiyumva

Abstract


This study aimed at developing content and language integrated English speaking learning materials for the students of international accounting study program to help them learn, practise and improve their speaking skills first in content subjects classes and then in their future career. The study  involved 27 third year students of Accounting Department,  Faculty of Economics, Yogyakarta State University. The data were collected through an interview, classroom observation, and a students’ questionnaire. The research findings show that, the students prefer: business, accounting basics, accounting concepts, and financial accounting accounting contents topics. In terms of classroom activities, students preferred making presentations, discussion, dialogues, role-plays, and making descriptions. The students have difficulties in discussions/debates, pronunciation, grammatical structures, and knowledge of specific vocabulary items. Their priorities for speaking English include presentations, discussions, questions and answers, descriptions, and using specific vocabulary items. Their preferences on the components of the English speaking learning materials include conversations/dialogues, grammatical features, specific vocabulary items, presentations, and discussions/debates. The evaluation of the developed materials falls in the Very Good category for both experts and students’ evaluation.


Keywords


content and language integrated materials; English; accounting students; speaking skills.

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Ahmed, F., Abel, G. A., Lloyd, C. E., Burt, J., & Roland, M. (2015). Does the availability of a South Asian language in practices improve reports of doctor-patient communication from South Asian patients? Cross sectional analysis of a national patient survey in English general practices. BMC family practice, 16(1), 55. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0270-5

Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 243-262. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Philadelphia: John Benjamins B.V.

de Zarobe, Y. R., & Catalán, R. M. J. (2009). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Channel View Publications.

Devos, J. N. (2016). Peer interactions in new content and language integrated settings. Switzerland: Springer

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press

Herminingsih, D. I. (2015). The use of the effective vocabulary, grammar and function of English by the biology teachers. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 144-157. Retrived from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijele/article/view/8533

Huang, C. (2014). A needs analysis for Chinese language teaching at a university in the United States. Language Learning in Higher Education, 4(2), pp. 395-422. Retrieved 24 Oct. 2018, from doi:10.1515/cercles-2014-0021

Kim, J. E., & Yoo, H. (2016). A Sports English Teaching Model Based on Winter Sports Instructors' Needs and Perceptions 1. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 19(4), 1045-1050.

Li, J. (2014). Needs analysis: An effective way in business English curriculum design. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 4(9), 1869-1874

Littlewood, W., & William, L. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Newton, J., & Kusmierczyk, E. (2011). Teaching second languages for the workplace. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 74-92.

Parsons, D. (2017). Formative assessment in discussion tasks. ELT Journal, 71(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw043

Remache, A. (2013). The universality of scientific discourse. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 37-52.

Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. N. (2014). The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828-848.

Ruiz-Garrido, M. F., Palmer, J. C. , & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2010). English for professional and academic purposes. Rodopi.

Sasson, D. (2013). Speaking and writing for English language learners: Collaborative teaching for greater success with K-6. Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2011). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations (2008). Teaching science through English: A CLIL approach. United Kingdom: Cambridge Assessment Group




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v5i1.13829

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 LingTera

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Our Journal indexed by:



Creative Commons License
Jurnal LingTera by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/ljtp/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All rights reserved p-ISSN: 2406-9213 | e-ISSN: 2477-1961

View My Stats