Assessing Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Knowledge and Practices of Chemistry Teachers in Vocational Senior Secondary Schools

Elin Driana, Graduate School of University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jl. Warung Buncit Raya No. 17, Pancoran Jakarta Selatan 12790, Indonesia
Ary Susilowati, Graduate School of University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jl. Warung Buncit Raya No. 17, Pancoran Jakarta Selatan 12790, Indonesia
Ernawati Ernawati, Graduate School of University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jl. Warung Buncit Raya No. 17, Pancoran Jakarta Selatan 12790, Indonesia
Abd. Rahman A. Ghani, Graduate School of University of Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Jl. Warung Buncit Raya No. 17, Pancoran Jakarta Selatan 12790, Indonesia

Abstract


The success of efforts in developing students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) to face the complex challenges in the 21st century also depends on how teachers implement classroom assessments. Studies on teachers' knowledge and practices have been conducted at different levels of education. However, studies that involved teachers in vocational senior secondary schools are still limited. Therefore, this qualitative study aimed at exploring chemistry teachers' knowledge of HOTS, their assessment practices, and the barriers encountered. Ten chemistry teachers from three public and six private vocational senior secondary schools in South Jakarta were involved in this study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted between August and September 2019. The findings revealed that almost all chemistry teachers believed that providing students in vocational senior secondary schools with HOTS was essential. However, knowledge of HOTS among most teachers was still inadequate, contributing to their unpreparedness in assessing the skills. Misunderstanding about higher-order thinking was also revealed, such as associating higher-order thinking with item difficulties. The teachers in this study considered students' factors as barriers in cultivating HOTS in chemistry learning in vocational senior secondary schools, such as lack of motivation, low academic ability, and lack of reading habits. The teachers also mentioned the shortage of facilities as another barrier that inhibited their efforts in fostering HOTS in chemistry learning. Proper teacher professional development programs are needed to increase teachers' understanding of HOTS assessment and help them develop various strategies for fostering HOTS among vocational senior secondary school students.


Keywords


assessment, chemistry education, higher-order thinking skills, teacher's knowledge, vocational school

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. S. Yeung, “Conception of teaching higher order thinking: perspectives of Chinese teachers in Hong Kong,” Curric. J., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 553–578, 2015.

A. Zohar and V. A. Agmon, “Raising test scores vs. teaching higher order thinking (HOT): senior science teachers’ views on how several concurrent policies affect classroom practices,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 243–260, 2018, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1395332.

S. Toledo and J. M. Dubas, “Encouraging higher-order thinking in general chemistry by scaffolding student learning using Marzano’s taxonomy,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 64–69, 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184.

Y. J. Dori, V. Dangur, S. Avargil, and U. Peskin, “Assessing advanced high school and undergraduate students’ thinking skills: The chemistry-from the nanoscale to microelectronics module,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1306–1317, 2014, doi: 10.1021/ed500007s.

M. Barak and Y. J. Dori, “Enhancing higher order thinking skills among inservice science teachers via embedded assessment,” J. Sci. Teacher Educ., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 459–474, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10972-009-9141-z.

B. FitzPatrick and H. Schulz, “Do curriculum outcomes and assessment activities in science encourage higher order thinking?,” Can. J. Sci. Math. Technol. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 136–154, 2015, doi: 10.1080/14926156.2015.1014074.

M. Aksela, Supporting meaningful chemistry learning and higher-order thinking through computer-assisted inquiry : A design research approach. 2005.

S. Avargil, O. Herscovitz, and Y. J. Dori, “Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 207–225, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7.

M. Overman, J. D. Vermunt, P. C. Meijer, A. M. W. Bulte, and M. Brekelmans, “Textbook questions in context-based and traditional chemistry curricula analysed from a content perspective and a learning activities perspective,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 2954–2978, 2013, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.680253.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. 2016.

M. Samani, B. A. W. Putra, R. Rahmadian, and J. N. Rohman, “Learning strategy to develop critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills for vocational school students,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2019, doi: 10.21831/jptk.v25i1.22574.

A. Hasan and P. Pardjono, “The correlation of higher order thinking skills and work readiness of vocational high school students,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 52–61, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.21831/jptk.v25i1.19118.

J.-A. Baird, D. Andrich, T. N. Hopfenbeck, and G. Stobart, “Assessment and learning: fields apart?,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 317–350, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337.

Samritin and Suryanto, “Developing an assessment instrument of junior high school students’ higher order thinking skills in mathematics,” Res. Eval. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 92–107, 2016, doi: :http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i1.8268.

J. L. Jensen, M. A. McDaniel, S. M. Woodard, and T. A. Kummer, “Teaching to the test...or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 307–329, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9.

S. Hamdi, I. A. Suganda, and N. Hayati, “Developing higher-order thinking skill (HOTS) test instrument using Lombok local cultures as contexts for junior secondary school mathematics,” Res. Eval. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 126–135, 2018, doi: 10.21831/reid.v4i2.22089.

S. M. Brookhart, How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2010.

E. Driana and Ernawati, “Teachers’ understanding and practices in assessing higher order thinking skills at primary schools,” Acitya J. Teach. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 110–118, 2019.

D. Dahlan, L. Permana, and M. Oktariani, “Teacher’s competence and difficulties in constructing HOTS instruments in economics subject,” Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 111–119, 2020.

H. Schulz and B. FitzPatrick, “Teachers’ understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments,” Alberta J. Educ. Res., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 61–86, 2016.

W. M. W. Yusoff and S. C. Seman, “Teachers’ knowledge of higher order thinking and questioning skills: a case study at a primary school in Terengganu, Malaysia,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 45–63, 2018, doi: 10.6007/ijarped/v7-i2/4120.

H. Retnawati, H. Djidu, Kartianom, E. Apino, and R. D. Anazifa, “Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy,” Probl. Educ. 21st Century, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 215–230, 2018.

A. Zohar and N. Schwartzer, “Assessing teachers’ pedagogical knowledge in the context of teaching higher-order thinking,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1595–1620, 2005, doi: 10.1080/09500690500186592.

N. Nurmawati, E. Driana, and E. Ernawati, “Pemahaman guru kimia SMA tentang penilaian kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi dan implementasinya,” EDUSAINS, vol. 12, no. 2, 2020.

J. R. Fraenkel and N. E. Wallen, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 6th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill International Edition, 2007.

J. A. Hatch, Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.

M. C. Schneider, K. L. Huff, K. L. Egan, M. L. Gaines, and S. Ferrara, “Relationships among item cognitive complexity, contextual demands, and item difficulty: implications for achievement-level descriptors,” Educ. Assessment, vol. 18, pp. 99–121, 2013, doi: 0.1080/10627197.2013.789296.

S. Dogan, R. Pringle, and J. Mesa, “The impacts of professional learning communities on science teachers’ knowledge, practice and student learning: a review,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 569–588, 2016, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2015.1065899.

E. Forsberg and W. Wermke, “Knowledge sources and autonomy: German and Swedish teachers’ continuing professional development of assessment knowledge,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 741–758, 2012, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2012.694369.

I. B. Yuliastini, S. Rahayu, F. Fajaroh, and N. Mansour, “Effectiveness of pogil with ssi context on vocational high school students’ chemistry learning motivation,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 85–95, 2018, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v7i1.9928.

H. Čtrnáctová, L. Čtrnáctová, and P. Šmejkal, “IBSE in chemistry education - testing students’ skills and teacher training,” Lumat Int. J. Math, Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 556–567, 2015, doi: 10.31129/lumat.v3i4.1023.

K. Broman, S. Bernholt, and C. Christensson, “Relevant or interesting according to upper secondary students? Affective aspects of context-based chemistry problems,” Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–21, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1824177.

G. V. Madhuri, V. S. S. N. Kantamreddi, and L. N. S. Prakash Goteti, “Promoting higher order thinking skills using inquiry-based learning,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 117–123, 2012, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2012.661701.

M. Aksela, “Engaging students for meaningful chemistry learning through Microcomputer-based Laboratory (MBL) inquiry,” Educ. Química, vol. 0, no. 09, pp. 30-37–37, 2011, doi: 10.2436/eduq.v0i09.60329.

Y. J. Dori and Z. Kaberman, “Assessing high school chemistry students’ modeling sub-skills in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment,” Instr. Sci., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 69–91, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9172-7.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v27i1.32882

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Online (e-ISSN): 2477-2410 || Printed (p-ISSN): 0854-4735


Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jptk was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Supported by:

Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Managemen

Social Media: