Power, Credit and Fairness in Research Authorship
Downloads
Purpose. Authorship determines who receives credit for research and who is accountable for it, yet decisions about who is listed, and in what order, are often left implicit until submission. This article examines how power, incentives and ambiguity distort authorship, and how attribution can be made fairer.
Design. The article is conceptual. It synthesises evidence on authorship criteria, honorary and coercive authorship, contributorship and research funding incentives, using a widely shared practitioner account of lost first authorship as an illustrative prompt.
Findings. Survey estimates of honorary authorship in the health sciences range from 18% to 51% depending on how it is measured. A South African faculty study found formal authorship agreements for only 7% of multi-author manuscripts and more problems on postgraduate than staff manuscripts. The byline cannot convey who did what, and subsidy rules that credit all authors equally regardless of contribution may add to the pressures behind honorary authorship.
Implications. Authorship should be agreed early, documented and revisited, with contributor role statements supplementing author order. Journals, funders and assessment bodies internationally should reward documented contributions rather than publication counts, and international partnerships should protect local researchers' authorship. South Africa illustrates how national funding rules can shape attribution.
Originality. The article offers a framework of authorship distortion, an attribution timeline and a decision guide applicable across research systems.
Downloads
Allen, L., Scott, J., Brand, A., Hlava, M., & Altman, M. (2014). Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature, 508(7496), 312–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/508312a
AOSIS. (n.d.). AOSIS comments on the Research Outputs Policy, 2015. https://aosis.co.za/aosis-comments-on-the-research-outputs-policy-2015/
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. (2022). Agreement on reforming research assessment. https://coara.org/agreement/the-commitments/
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools
Department of Higher Education and Training. (2015). Research outputs policy, 2015. Department of Higher Education and Training.
Hagen, N. T. (2008). Harmonic allocation of authorship credit: Source-level correction of bibliometric bias assures accurate publication and citation analysis. PLoS ONE, 3(12), e4021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004021
Harley, Y. X., Huysamen, E., Hlungwani, C., & Douglas, T. (2016). Does the DHET research output subsidy model penalise high-citation publication? A case study. South African Journal of Science, 112(5/6), Article 2015-0352. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150352
Hedt-Gauthier, B. L., Jeufack, H. M., Neufeld, N. H., Alem, A., Sauer, S., Odhiambo, J., Boum, Y., Shuchman, M., & Volmink, J. (2019). Stuck in the middle: A systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014–2016. BMJ Global Health, 4(5), e001853. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001853
Holcombe, A. (2019). Farewell authors, hello contributors. Nature, 571(7764), 147. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02084-8
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
Joubert, G., & van Rooyen, C. (2026). Authorship practices and experiences in a South African Faculty of Health Sciences. Research Ethics, 22(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161251356299
Karmacharya, P. (2026). Authorship order is the most political sentence in your paper [Post]. LinkedIn.
Kwok, L. S. (2005). The White Bull effect: Abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 554–556. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010553
Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435.
Meursinge Reynders, R. A., ter Riet, G., Di Girolamo, N., Cavagnetto, D., & Malički, M. (2024). Honorary authorship is highly prevalent in health sciences: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surveys. Scientific Reports, 14, 4385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54909-w
Partin, K., & Hosseini, M. (2026). Using the contributor role taxonomy (CRediT) as a tool in resolving authorship disputes at the NIH. Accountability in Research, 33(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2596063
Research Professional News. (2026, July 7). South Africa to tackle ‘gaming’ of research outputs subsidy. https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-africa-south-2026-7-south-africa-to-tackle-gaming-of-research-outputs-subsidy/
Ross, M. B., Glennon, B. M., Murciano-Goroff, R., Berkes, E. G., Weinberg, B. A., & Lane, J. I. (2022). Women are credited less in science than men. Nature, 608(7921), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w
Smith, E., Hunt, M., & Master, Z. (2014). Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Medical Ethics, 15, 42.
Smith, R. (2012). Let's simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship. BMJ, 344, e157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e157
University of Johannesburg. (n.d.). DHET publication subsidy. https://www.uj.ac.za/research/dhet-publication-subsidy
Wislar, J. S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., & DeAngelis, C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. BMJ, 343, d6128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128
Copyright (c) 2026 Michael Mncedisi Willie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter agree to the following terms:
-
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal, and under the same licence.
- Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online before and during the submission process.
