Moodle-based arabic sentence writing materials: A Hannafin & Peck development study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpip.v18i1.92663Keywords:
Hannafin and Peck model, moodle, arabic sentence writing, material developmen, arabic language learningAbstract
This study aims to develop Arabic sentence-writing learning materials (kitabah al-jumal) based on the Moodle Learning Management System for beginner-level students, particularly graduates of non-Islamic senior high schools who have limited foundational competence in Arabic. This research employed a Research and Development (R&D) design using the Hannafin and Peck model, which consists of analysis, design, and development and implementation stages, with the study limited to the product validation phase. The analysis stage involved observations, interviews with lecturers, and diagnostic tests to identify learners’ needs. The design stage produced five core instructional units, PDF modules, learning videos, and their integration into Moodle. The development and implementation stage comprised product construction and expert validation, while product feasibility was assessed using questionnaires and analyzed using percentage calculations. The material expert provided a score of 77% (good/feasible) with several revision notes related to linguistic accuracy, whereas media expert validation scored 90.67% (very feasible) with no required revisions. Limited implementation with 32 students indicated that the product was easy to use and supported comprehension of basic sentence structures, suggesting that the developed materials are feasible and appropriate for beginner learners and may serve as a foundation for further Moodle-based Arabic instruction in higher education.
References
Aliyah, S. A., & Hidayanti, P. N. Y. (2022). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dengan Menggunakan E-Learning Berbasis Moodle. Aphorisme, 3(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.37680/aphorisme.v3i1.1447
Aljenobi, A. A. R. (2025). The Interplay of Academic Writing Skills and Attitudes Toward Classical Arabic Among Graduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(3), 948–956. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1603.25
Andriani, P. T., Sudatha, I. G. W., & Suartama, I. K. (2021). E-Summary Teaching Materials with Hannafin & Peck Models for Training Participants. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 4(3), 534. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i3.40131
Bendridi, A. (2021). Penggunaan Aktivitas Komunikatif dan Kolaboratif dalam Pembelajaran Daring Berbasis Moodle. Ijaz Arabi, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v4i2.10923
Cerón, J., Baldiris, S., & Quintero, J. (2024). Autorregúlate, Methodology to Support Self-Regulated Learning in MOOC Courses. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica Del Norte, 71, 50–80. https://doi.org/10.35575/rvucn.n71a4
Dahmayanti, S., Nugraha, M. S., & Tarsono, T. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Model Hannafin and Peck sebagai Pendekatan Desain Pembelajaran. ISLAMIKA, 6(1), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v6i1.4243
David, A., Mihai, D., Mihailescu, M.-E., Carabas, M., & Tapus, N. (2022). Scalability through Distributed Deployment for Moodle LMS. Procedia Computer Science, 214, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.145
Dinata, P. Y., Amiruddin, Muslim, & Aridan, M. (2023). Development of Codular-Based Instructional Media. Aphorisme, 4(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.37680/aphorisme.v4i2.3583
Dobashi, K., Ho, C. P., Fulford, C. P., Lin, M.-F. G., & Higa, C. (2022). Learning Pattern Classification using Moodle Logs. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100105
Fahmi, A. K., Rachmawati, M., & Surong, K. (2022). Content Validity of LMS-Moodle-Based Academic Writing Model. Izdihar, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v5i2.21542
Hannafin, M. J., & Peck, K. L. (1988). The Design, Development, and Evaluation of Instructional Software. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Hristov, S., Nakov, D., & Miocinovic, J. (2023). Constructive Alignment in Higher Education. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Sciences, 21(2), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.46763/JAPS23212021h
Ikawati, L. (2020). Scaffolding in Teaching Writing. AL-TARBIYAH, 30(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.24235/ath.v30i1.6487
Jamil, H., & Agung, N. (2022). Tantangan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Era Society 5.0. Alibbaa’, 3(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.19105/ajpba.v3i1.5536
Koh, S. (2021). Efficacy of Basic Sentence Pattern Approach. STEM Journal, 22(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2021.22.4.1
Lan, M., & Zhou, X. (2025). AI Empowered Self-Regulated Learning. Npj Science of Learning, 10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00319-0
Liu, X., Liu, C.-H., & Li, Y. (2020). Computer-Assisted Learning Based on Dual Coding Theory. Symmetry, 12(5), 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12050701
Muliansyah, A., & Baroroh, R. U. (2020). Interferensi Gramatika Maharah Kitabah. Arabiyatuna, 4(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.29240/jba.v4i1.1289
Nazliati, N., Nurhanifah, N., Sari, R., & Alfiatunnur, A. (2024). LOLITA: Tajweed Game-Based Learning Media Development. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 25(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v25i1.22933
Nugraha, M. S., Bakhtiar, Y. H., & Dedih, U. (2024). Measuring Student Satisfaction with Hannafin & Peck. TSAQOFAH, 4(4), 3083–3090. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i4.3187
Pratama, N., Tampubolon, M. S., & Khanafi, K. (2022). Problematika Pembelajaran Mahasiswa Lulusan Sekolah Umum pada Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Madani Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.59944/jipsi.v1i2.45
Rabiman, R., Nurtanto, M., & Kholifah, N. (2020). Design And Development E-Learning System by Learning Management System (LMS) In Vocational Education. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9, 1. www.ijstr.org
Sehra, A. S. (2022). Problematika Latar Belakang Pendidikan Mahasiswa. El-Tsaqafah, 20(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v20i2.3827
Simanullang, N. H. S., & Rajagukguk, J. (2020). LMS Moodle to Improve Learning Activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462(1), 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012067
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, Research and Development (R&D), dan Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Tegeh, I. M., Jampel, I. N., & Pudjawan, K. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pengembangan. Graha Ilmu.
Tungkagi, F. M., Ali, I., & Kasan, Y. (2022). Problematika Mahasiswa Non-Madrasah. Al-Fakkaar, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.52166/alf.v3i1.2854
Yasri, A. S., & Yoyo, Y. (2022). Kesulitan Pembelajaran Nahwu dengan Blended Learning. An Nabighoh, 24(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.32332/an-nabighoh.v24i2.4803
Yusuf, J., Alhafidz, A. Z., & Luthfi, M. F. (2019). Menulis Terstruktur dalam Maharah Al-Kitabah. An Nabighoh, 21(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.32332/an-nabighoh.v21i02.1683
Zainuddin, N., Sahrir, M. S., Idrus, R. M., & Jaafar, M. N. (2016). Scaffolding a conceptual support for personalized arabic vocabulary learning using augmented reality (ar) enhanced flashcards. Journal of Personalized Learning, 2(1): 102-110.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anjani Prameswari Safiratuljannah, Imam Asrori, Mohammad Ahsanuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
![Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](/index.php/jpip/manager/setup/<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img%20alt="Lisensi%20Creative%20Commons"%20style="border-width:0"%20src="https:/i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png"%20/></a><br%20/>Ciptaan%20disebarluaskan%20di%20bawah%20<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Lisensi%20Creative%20Commons%20Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa%204.0%20Internasional</a>.){kind=link}