Anti-Performative Religious Authority in Algorithmic Culture: Rethinking Legitimacy through Inner Piety in the Digital Preaching of Gus Baha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v56i1.98177Abstract
Digital media have changed how religious authority works by making visibility and engagement more important. Many studies in digital religion suggest that legitimacy depends on being visible in algorithms and presenting oneself strategically. This study questions that idea by looking at a different kind of religious authority that resists performative norms. I used an interpretive qualitative approach to analyze 30 sermon recordings from YouTube, published between February and December 2025, and 700 audience comments from various channels, including both official and informal community accounts. The analysis focused on how piety, authority, and authenticity are discussed and negotiated in digital religious spaces. For Gus Baha, authority came from inner piety, such as intention, ethical reasoning, and reflective understanding, and from keeping a clear distance from performative displays. Audience comments indicated that this non-performative approach appealed to listeners tired of moralistic, visibility-focused religious messages. They valued intellectual depth, humility, and emotional support over algorithmic popularity. This article introduces the idea of anti-performative religious authority and explains how it differs from authenticity, symbolic authority, and charismatic authority. The findings show that visibility is not required for religious legitimacy in algorithmic culture. The study also offers a framework for comparing digital religious figures, platforms, and communication contexts.
References
Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177
Al Farisi, A. (2023). Kredibilitas dai: Studi kasus dakwah Gus Baha. Bil Hikmah: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 3(1). https://bilhikmah.stidalhadid.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/49
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Bunt, G. R. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority. University of North Carolina Press.
Campbell, H. A. (2013). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society, 10(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089414
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
Dewi, A. S., et al. (2023). Kesantunan berbahasa dakwah Gus Baha pada media sosial YouTube: Kebermanfaatannya bagi pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Keilmuan dan Keislaman, 4(1). https://jsr.ums.ac.id/jkk/article/view/64
Dijck, J. van. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Echchaibi, N. (2018). Muslimah media watch: Media activism and the Muslim woman. Palgrave Macmillan.
Enli, G. (2015). Mediated authenticity: How the media constructs reality. Peter Lang.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon Books.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
Hakim, L., & Pardianto. (2025). The metacultural logics of religious rhetoric in moderate Islamic preaching: A qualitative study of Gus Baha and Gus Iqdam. Mawaizh: Jurnal Dakwah dan Pengembangan Sosial Kemanusiaan. https://rumahjurnal.iainsasbabel.ac.id/maw/article/view/6024
Hamdi, A. Z. (2021, November 11). Popularitas Gus Baha: Gerakan sosial Islam berbasis medsos. Arrahim.id. https://arrahim.id/azh/popularitas-gus-baha-gerakan-sosial-islam-berbasis-medsos/
Han, B.-C. (2015). The burnout society. Stanford University Press.
Han, B.-C. (2017). In the swarm: Digital prospects. MIT Press.
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.
Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change. Culture and Religion, 12(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579719
Hoover, S. M. (2016). The media and religious authority. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Khafidhoh. (2024). Dakwah media sosial Gus Baha dan relevansinya dalam kehidupan sosial kontemporer. Journal of Communication Studies, 4(2). https://ejournal.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/jcs/article/view/6714
Lundby, K. (Ed.). (2014). Mediatization of communication. De Gruyter Mouton.
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379
Muhammad, D. S., & Abadi, T. W. (2024). Da’wa Gus Baha in the perspective of face negotiation theory. Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 12(2). https://kanal.umsida.ac.id/index.php/kanal/article/view/1759
Mustopa, R., Sarbini, A., & Rusliana, I. (2024). Metode dakwah Gus Baha melalui humor di channel YouTube Santri Gayeng. Tabligh: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 10(2). https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/tabligh/article/view/40335
Prihartanto, L. (2023). Kesantunan bahasa tubuh dalam dakwah Gus Baha. Bil Hikmah: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 3(1). https://bilhikmah.stidalhadid.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/51
Rikardo, A. R., Kusnadi, & Muslimin. (2024). Analisis pesan dakwah Gus Baha pada channel YouTube Najwa Shihab. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(4).
Sadili, I. (2021). Aspek humor dalam retorika dakwah Gus Baha di media YouTube. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 22(2). https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/tabligh/article/view/23647
Sidiq, M. Y. (2025). Balancing sharia and spirituality: Gus Baha’s interpretation of Wahdatul Wujud in the teachings of Siti Jenar. DINIKA: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(2). https://ejournal.uinsaid.ac.id/dinika/article/view/11261
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.
Woodward, M. R. (1989). Islam in Java: Normative piety and mysticism in the Sultanate of Yogyakarta. University of Arizona Press.
Woodward, M. R. (2011). Java, Indonesia and Islam. In J. L. Esposito (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Islam in Southeast Asia (pp. 95–112). Oxford University Press.
Yusuf, N. (2020, July 1). Gus Baha, ulama-cum-cendekia yang anti mainstream. Arrahim.id. https://arrahim.id/ny/gus-baha-ulama-cum-cendekia-yang-anti-hegemoni/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lia Hilyatul Masrifah, Robby Aditya Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
