Quantum Superposition of Media Messages: Assessing Sustenance and Collapse Trigger of Contradictory Beliefs Across Climate Change, Political Narratives, and AI Discourses in Nigeria

Authors

  • Samuel Sunday Ameh University of Nigeria, Nigeria
  • Nathan Oguche Emmanuel National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria
  • Precious Ojocheneyo Ugbaje Prince Abubakar Audu University, Nigeria
  • Nworie Chukwuebuka Stephen Ebonyi State University, Nigeria
  • Raphael Chijioke EZE State University of Medical and Applied Sciences, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v56i1.90624

Keywords:

Quantum cognition, belief superposition, climate change, Political Narratives, AI

Abstract

This study applies quantum cognition frameworks to investigate how Nigerian media audiences sustain contradictory beliefs ("superposition") across climate change, political narratives, and AI discourses. The study examines: (1) extent of superposition prevalence, (2) probabilistic belief distributions via quantum mathematics, (3) real-world collapse triggers, and (4) superposition duration. Using a mixed-design quasi-experiment, 800 Nigerian adults completed a Quantum Belief Scale (QBS) measuring probabilistic agreement with contradictory statements. Participants were stratified into intervention groups receiving domain-specific stimuli (IPCC reports, OECD guidelines, political endorsements) and a control. Experience Sampling Methodology tracked real-time belief fluctuations over 14 days. Quantum probability models and survival analyses were applied. Key findings reveal: Significant superposition across domains—political (56.7%), climate (50.1%), AI (45.2%)—challenging cognitive dissonance models. Climate-political beliefs showed strongest quantum correlations (concurrence=0.435±0.056), violating Bell inequalities (S>2), confirming non-classical interdependencies. Triggers like authoritative credible sources (e.g., NIMET climate data: 81.2% collapse rate) outperformed social media. Domain-specific interventions reduced superposition by 16–18% without cross-domain spillover. Also, the duration of median superposition stability lasted 8.4 days, extended among rural (9.1 days) and less educated (9.8 days) participants. Beliefs re-superposed within 18–24 hours post-collapse without reinforcement.

References

Afrobarometer. (2023). Summary of results: Afrobarometer Round 9 survey in Nigeria, 2022. https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nigeria-Afrobarometer-R9-Summary-of-Results-26august2022.pdf

Busemeyer, J. R., & Bruza, P. D. (2012). Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press.

Collier, P., & Vicente, P. C. (2014). Votes and Violence: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria. The Economic Journal, 124(574), F327-F355. https://academic.oup.com/ej/article-abstract/124/574/F327/5078026

Druckman, J. N. (2022). A framework for the study of persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 86(S1), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-110428

Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1

Enders, C. K. (2017). Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data handling. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.008

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of communication, 57(1), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x

Fasce, A., Adrián-Ventura, J., Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Science through a tribal lens: A group-based account of polarization over scientific facts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211050323 (Original work published 2023)

Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/10635

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x

Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2021). Implications of pro- and counter-attitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 47(4), 409-436. https://rkellygarrett.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/prepress-Garrett-et-al.-Implications-of-Pro-and-Counterattitudinal-exposure.pdf

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

Kahan, D. M. (2017). Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2973067

Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 54–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.2

Lewandowsky, S. (2020). The 'debunking handbook' revisited: Consensus on consensus.

Lewis, D., Kew, D., & Kew, A. (2019). Electoral integrity, political trust and the acceptance of election results in Nigeria. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 57(4), 416–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2019.1656501

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x

Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212474472

Neuman, W. R., Guggenheim, L., Jang, S. M., & Bae, S. Y. (2020). The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 183–214. https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/64/2/193/4086099?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23

NOIPolls. (2021). Nigerians perception on artificial intelligence (AI). https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Nigeria-Afrobarometer-R9-Summary-of-Results-26august2022.pdf

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 29(2), 222-244.

https://instituteforpr.org/the-roles-of-information-deficits-and-identity-threat-in-the-prevalence-of-misperceptions/#:~:text=The%20Roles%20of%20Information%20Deficits,Misperceptions%20%7C%20Institute%20for%20Public%20Relations

Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Karasu, M., Tsubakihara, S., Yoshimura, N., & Demski, C. (2023). Climate anxiety, wellbeing and pro-environmental action correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101872. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357985350_Climate_anxiety_proenvironmental_action_and_wellbeing_antecedents_and_outcomes_of_negative_emotional_responses_to_climate_change_in_28_countries/citations

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Recommendation of the Council of AI (OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 340). OECD Publishing. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449

Pew Research Center. (2022, August 31). Climate Change Remains Top Global Threat Across 19-Country Survey. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2022/08/31/climate-change-remains-top-global-threat-across-19-country-survey/

Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2022). Quantum cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 749–778. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-123501

Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. (2023). Digital News Report 2023. University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-06/Digital_News_Report_2023.pdf

Schrödinger, E. (1935). Die gegenwärtige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23(48), 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01491987

Taneja, H., Webster, J. G., Malthouse, E. C., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires. New Media & Society, 14(6), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811436146

van der Linden, S. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045

Van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J. (2020). Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790

Van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J. (2021). Inoculating against COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(4), 766–784. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33655205/

Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J. R., Atmanspacher, H., & Pothos, E. M. (2013). The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(4), 672-688. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tops.12043

Wang, Z., Solloway, T., Shiffrin, R. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2020). Quantum dynamics of human decision-making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98, 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102422

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Ameh, S. S., Emmanuel, N. O., Ugbaje, P. O., Stephen, N. C., & EZE, R. C. (2026). Quantum Superposition of Media Messages: Assessing Sustenance and Collapse Trigger of Contradictory Beliefs Across Climate Change, Political Narratives, and AI Discourses in Nigeria. Informasi, 56(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v56i1.90624

Issue

Vol. 56 No. 1 (2026): Informasi

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Samuel Sunday Ameh; Nathan Oguche Emmanuel; Precious Ojocheneyo Ugbaje, Nworie Chukwuebuka Stephen, Raphael Chijioke EZE

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).