Yahoo Boys vs. Crypto Bros: Algorithmic Amplification Patterns of Financial Disinformation and Fraud on X and Facebook
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v55i2.90537Keywords:
Algorithm, Financial Disinformation, Yahoo Boys, Crypto Bros, FraudAbstract
This paper examines how social media platforms X (Twitter) and Facebook algorithmically amplify financial disinformation and fraud, comparing two distinct archetypes: the relational deception of “Yahoo Boys” and the techno-utopian rhetoric of “Crypto Bros.” Using a mixed-methods approach—including algorithmic auditing, network analysis, and victim interviews—the research demonstrates that fraudulent content is amplified 67 times faster than legitimate content due to platform design that prioritizes high-arousal engagement. It reveals critical structural vulnerabilities in content moderation, including severe scale limitations and systemic biases that disproportionately fail non-English and African-language communities. The findings show that micro-targeting tools originally designed for advertisers are weaponized to prey on vulnerable users. The study concludes that platforms are active architects of digital financial risk, necessitating fundamental reforms in algorithmic design and moderation practices.
References
Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we think and know. Routledge.
Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. Basic Books. https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/daniel-bell/the-coming-of-post-industrial-society/9780465097135/
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity Press.
Bishop, S. (2021). Algorithmic entrepreneurs: The obfuscation of financial harm on social media. New Media & Society.
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313-7318.
Caplan, R., & boyd, d. (2018). Isomorphism through algorithms: Institutional dependencies in the case of Facebook. Big Data & Society, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718757253
Caplan, R., Hanson, L., & Donovan, J. (2018). Dead reckoning: Navigating content moderation after "fake news". Data & Society Research Institute.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.
Chen, A. (2014). The laborers who keep dick pics and beheadings out of your Facebook feed. Wired.
Citron, D. K., & Pasquale, F. (2014). The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Washington Law Review, 89(1), 1-33. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol89/iss1/2/
Cohen, J. E. (2013). What privacy is for. Harvard Law Review, 126(7), 1904-1933.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Crain, M. (2018). The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification. New Media & Society, 20(1), 88-104.
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) (pp. 4171-4186).
Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., Hamilton, K., & Sandvig, C. (2015). "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]": Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 153-162). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
Ferguson, J. (2006). Global shadows: Africa in the neoliberal world order. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387640
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2017). Seeing like a market. Socio-Economic Review, 15(1), 9-29.
Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300235029/custodians-of-the-internet/
Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854-871.
Gorwa, R., Binns, R., & Katzenbach, C. (2020). Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1).
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016). The social impact of natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) (pp. 591-598).
Kaye, D. (2019). Speech police: The global struggle to govern the Internet. Columbia Global Reports.
Klonick, K. (2018). The new governors: The people, rules, and processes governing online speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6), 1598-1670.
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788-8790.
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 4765-4774).
Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.
Newton, C. (2019). The trauma floor: The secret lives of Facebook moderators in America. The Verge.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Roberts, S. T. (2019). Behind the screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300245318/behind-the-screen/
Rogers, R. (2018). Otherwise engaged: Social media from vanity metrics to critical analytics. International Journal of Communication, 12, 450-472.
Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., & Langbort, C. (2014). Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on Internet platforms. Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry, 1-23.
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2019). The risk of racial bias in hate speech detection. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1668-1678).
Seaver, N. (2017). Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104
Seaver, N. (2018). Captivating algorithms: Recommender systems as traps. Journal of Material Culture, 24(4), 421-436.
Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin Press.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Suzor, N. P. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press.
Ticona, J., & Mateescu, A. (2018). Trusted strangers: Carework platforms' cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4384-4404.
Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo3615170.html
Turow, J. (2017). The aisles have eyes: How retailers track your shopping, strip your privacy, and define your power. Yale University Press.
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/antisocial-media-9780190841164
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/27308
Zannettou, S., Caulfield, T., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Sirivianos, M., & Stringhini, G. (2019). On the origins of memes by means of fringe web communities. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference (pp. 188-202).
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-01-01 (2)
- 2025-12-31 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nathan Oguche Emmanuel, Samuel Ameh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License