### EXPLORING STUDENT MATHEMATICAL ENGAGEMENT USING ADAPTED WATSON’ ANALYTICAL TOOL

**Baiq Rika Ayu Febrilia**, IKIP Mataram, Indonesia

**Ita Chairun Nissa**, Departement of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, IKIP Mataram, Indonesia

#### Abstract

#### Keywords

#### Full Text:

PDF#### References

Attard, C. (2012). Engagement with mathematics: What does it mean and what does it look like?. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(1), 9-13.

Attard, C. (2015). Getting passionate about maths. Journal of Professional Learning, Semester, 1. Retrieved from http://www.cpl.asn.au/journal/semester-1-2015/getting-passionate-about-maths.

Barkatsas, A. T., Kasimatis, K., & Gialamas, V. (2009). Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students‟ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Computers & Education, 52(3), 562-570.

Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, 8(13), 1-7.

Coates, H . (2007) A Model of Online and General Campus-Based Student Engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 32(2), 121–141. doi:10.1080/02602930600801878.

Dudley, C. J. (2010). An exploration of instructional strategies for increasing levels of student engagement in core subjects. Northcentral University.

Dharmayana, I. W., Kumara, A., & Wirawan, Y. G. (2012). Keterlibatan siswa (student engagement) sebagai mediator kompetensi emosi dan prestasi akademik. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(1), 76-94. doi:10.22146/jpsi.6968.

Eshun, I., & Mensah, M. F. (2013). Domain of educational objectives social studies teachers’ questions emphasise in Senior High Schools in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(4), 185-196. Retrieved from www.iiste.org.

Fauzan, A., Slettenhaar, D., & Plomp, T. (2002). Traditional mathematics education vs. realistic mathematics education: Hoping for changes. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 1-4). Centre for Researh in Learning Mathematics Copenhagen, Denmark.

Febrilia, B. R. A., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2019). Investigasi tingkat keterlibatan matematika siswa melalui analisis rancangan pelaksanaan pembelajaran ELPSA dan implementasinya di kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 55-72.

Fink, L. D. (2007). The power of course design to increase student engagement and learning. Peer Review, 9(1), 13-17.

Heritage, M., & Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 176-190. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.793190.

Hu, Y. L., Ching, G. S., & Chao, P. C. (2012). Taiwan student engagement model: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 1(1), 69-90. doi:10.5861/ijrse.2012.v1i1.19.

Jennie, L. & Bernard. (2014, July). Reasoning: Identifying opportunities (article). Retrieved from https://nrich.maths.org/10990.

Hourigan, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2007). Mathematical under-preparedness: the influence of the pre-tertiary mathematics experience on students’ ability to make a successful transition to tertiary level mathematics courses in Ireland. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(4), 461-476. doi:10.1080/00207390601129279.

Kanthan, G. (2011). Strengthening student engagement in the classroom. Singapore: National University of Singapore.

Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding Science Talk: The role of teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004-2027. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.604684.

Kong, Q. P., Wong, N. Y., & Lam, C. C. (2003). Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 4-21. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu.

Kramarski, B. (2008). Promoting teachers’ algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 83-99. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9020-6.

Kurniastuti, I., Setyawan, T. Y., & Sonialopita, S. (2018). Designing Essential Questions in the Process of Teaching and Learning to Deepen Understanding and Develop Students' Awareness Toward Environment. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 24(1), 57-70. doi:10.21831/cp.v37i1.15125.

Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2015a). ELPSA as a lesson design framework. Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 77-92.

Lowrie, T., & Patahuddin, S. M. (2015b). ELPSA–Kerangka kerja untuk merancang pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 2(1), 94-108. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/.

McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2013). Essential questions: Opening doors to student understanding. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Moyer, P. S., & Milewicz, E. (2002). Learning to question: Categories of questioning used by preservice teachers during diagnostic mathematics interviews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 293-315. doi:10.1023/A:1021251912775.

Mtetwa, D. K. (2005). Some characteristics of mathematics teaching in Zimbabwean infant and primary school classrooms. International Journal of Early Years Education, 13(3), 255-264. doi:10.1080/09669760500295912.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Panasuk, R., Stone, W., & Todd, J. (2002). Lesson planning strategy for effective mathematics teaching. Education, 122(4), 808-827.

Patahuddin, S. M., Puteri, I., Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Rika, B. (2017). Capturing student mathematical engagement through differently enacted classroom practices: Applying a modification of Watson's analytical tool. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(3), 384-400. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2017.1377300.

Peterson, P. L., & Fennema, E. (1985). Effective teaching, student engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 309-335. doi:10.3102/00028312022003309.

Posamentier, A. S., Germain-Williams, T. L., & Jaye, D. (2013). What Successful Math Teachers Do, Grades 6-12: 80 Research-based Strategies for the Common Core-aligned Classroom. Thousand, Oaks: Corwin Press. Doi:10.4135/9781452299853.

Ottevanger, W. J. W. (2001). Teacher support materials as a catalyst for science curriculum implementation in Namibia. Enschede: University of Twente.

Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700-712. doi:10.1037/a0027268.

Sembiring, R. K., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesian classrooms through RME. ZDM, 40(6), 927-939. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9.

Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education (pp. 475-494). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9-24.

Silver, H. F., & Perini, M. J. (2010). The Eight Cs of engagement: How learning styles and instructional design increase student commitment to learning. In R. J. Marzano (Ed.), On Excellence in Teaching (pp.319-344). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Sullivan, P., & McDonough, A. (2007). Eliciting positive student motivation for learning mathematics. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice (pp. 698-707). Adelaide: MERGA Inc.

Sunggingwati, D., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2013). Teachers' questioning in reading lessons: A case study in Indonesia. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 80-95.

Tan, Z. (2007). Questioning in Chinese university EL classrooms: What lies beyond it?. RELC journal, 38(1), 87-103.

Warwick, J. (2008). Mathematical self-efficacy and student engagement in the mathematics classroom. MSOR Connections, 8(3), 31-37. doi:10.11120/msor.2008.08030031.

Watson, A. (2007). The nature of participation afforded by tasks, questions and prompts in mathematics classrooms. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 111-126. Doi: 10.1080/14794800008520174.

Watson, A., & De Geest, E. (2012). Learning coherent mathematics through sequences of microtasks: Making a difference for secondary learners. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 213–235. doi:10.1007/s10763-011-9290-3.

Zahorian, S. A., Lakdawala, V. K., González, O. R., Starsman, S., & Leathrum, J. F. (2001). Question model for intelligent questioning systems in engineering education. In 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (pp.T2B-7). Reno, NV: IEEE. doi:10.1109/FIE.2001.963871.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.21478

### Refbacks

- There are currently no refbacks.

**Social Media:**

Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.