Analysis of Indonesian Mathematics Teachers’ Ability in Applying Authentic Assessment

Pardimin Pardimin, Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa, Indonesia

Abstract


Abstract: The 2013 curriculum implies the use of authentic assessment that emphasizes on the assessment of students' readiness aspects, processes and students’ learning outcomes as a whole. The integration of the assessment of the three components will demonstrate the students' capacity, style, and learning achievement. It is important for mathematics teachers to have the ability to conduct assessments of learning and to utilize the results of those assessments for the purposes of mathematics learning. This study aims to: (1) analyze the profile of the ability of the mathematics teachers in carrying out the authentic assessment, (2) find out the profile of the mathematics teachers’ ability to apply authentic assessment results, and (3) know the constraints of the mathematics teachers in developing the authentic assessment. This research uses a quantitative descriptive method involving junior high school teachers in Yogyakarta Indonesia. Data were collected using questionnaires and triangulated with documentation and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The results show that the ability of the junior high school teachers in Yogyakarta in applying and using the results of authentic assessment was relatively good. The teachers used authentic assessment information to design remedial and enrichment programs. This study also reveals that the teachers still experienced difficulties in developing authentic assessment instruments.
Keywords: authentic assessment, teachers’ ability, mathematics teachers, Curriculum 2013


Analisis Kemampuan Guru Matematika di Indonesia Dalam Menerapkan Penilaian Otentik

Abstrak: Kurikulum 2013 mengisyaratkan penggunaan penilaian otentik yang menekankan penilaian pada aspek kesiapan, proses, dan hasil belajar siswa secara utuh. Keterpaduan penilaian ketiga komponen tersebut akan menggambarkan kapasitas, gaya, dan perolehan belajar siswa. Penting bagi guru matematika untuk memiliki kemampuan menyelenggarakan penilaian terhadap pembelajaran serta memanfaatkan hasil penilaian tersebut untuk kepentingan pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) menganalisis profil kemampuan guru matematika dalam melaksanakan penilaian otentik, (2) profil kemampuan guru matematika dalam menerapkan hasil penilaian autentik, dan (3) mengetahui hambatan-hambatan dari guru matematika dalam mengembangkan penilaian otentik. Penelitian menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif yang melibatkan guru matematika SMP di Yogyakarta Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan kuesioner dan dilakukan triangulasi dengan dokumentasi dan Focus Group Discussion. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan guru SMP di Yogyakarta untuk menerapkan dan menggunakan hasil penilaian otentik relatif baik. Guru telah menggunakan informasi hasil penilaian otentik untuk mendesain program remedial dan pengayaan. Studi ini juga mengungkapkan bahwa para guru juga masih mengalami kendala dalam mengembangkan instrumen penilaian otentik.
Kata Kunci: penilaian otentik, kemampuan guru, guru matematika, Kurikulum 2013


Keywords


authentic assessment; teachers’ ability; mathematics teachers; curriculum 2013

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiman, U. (2013). Evaluasi pelaksanaan penilaian autentik Kurikulum 2013: Studi kasus di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri Tempel Sleman Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah, 1(1), 2527-6794.

Barber, W., King, S. & Buchanan, S. (2015). Problem-based learning and authentic assessment in digital pedagogy: embracing the role of collaborative communities. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(2).

Berg, D.H., Taylor, J., Hutchinson, N.L., Munby, H., Versnel, J., & Chin, P. (2007). Student assessment in exemplary work‐based education programs. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(4), 209-221.

Bosco, A., & Ferns, S. (2014). Embedding authentic assessment in work integrated learning assessment. Asia Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education. In Press.

Bullens, D. (2002). Authentic assessment: Change for the future. Dissertations, Master of Arts Action Research Project, Saint Xavier University.

Buyarski, A.C. & Landis, C.M. (2014). Using an ePortfolio to assess the outcomes of a First-Year Seminar: Student Narrative and Authentic Assessment. International Journal of ePortfolio, 4(1), 49-60.

Charoenchai, C., Phuseeorn, S. and Phengsawat, W. (2015).Teachers’ development model to authentic assessment by empowerment evaluation approach. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(17), 2524-2530.

Cheung, A.C.K. & Wong, P.M. 2012. Factors affecting the implementation of curriculum reform in Hong Kong: key findings from a large-scale survey study. International Journal of Educational Management, 36 (1), 39-54.

Craig, C.L. & McCormick, E.P. (2002). Improving student learning through authentic assessment. Dissertations, Master of Arts Action Research Project, Saint Xavier University.

Custer, R.L., Schell, J.W., McAlister, B., Scott, J., & Marie Hoepfl, M. (2000). Using Authentic Assessment in Vocational Education. Information Series No. 38, ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education the Ohio State University

Efriana, F. (2014). Penerapan pendekatan scientific untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar Siswa Kelas VII MTsN Palu Barat pada Materi Keliling dan Luas Daerah Layang-layang. Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, 1(2).

Engel, M., Pulley, R. & Rybinski, A. (2003). Authentic assessment: It really works. Masters action research project, Saint Xavier University and SkyLight.

Gao, X., & Grisham-Brown, J. (2011). The use of authentic assessment to report accountability data on young children’s language, literacy and pre-math competency. International Education Studies, 4(2).

Gronlund, N.E., & Linn, R. (1985).Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan.

Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P, 2004, A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (3), 67-85.

Heaney, L.F. (1994). Managing Assessment in the Classroom. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(1), 9-13.

Holme, T., Bretzb, S.L., Cooperc, M., Lewisd, J., Paeke, P., Pientaf, N., Stacyg, A., Stevensh, R., &Townsi, M. (2010). Enhancing the role of assessment in curriculum reform in chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract,11, 92–97.

Immegart.G.L. (1994).The School Head, Director, or Principal and School Assessment. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(1), 25-34.

Ine, M. E. (2015). Penerapan pendekatan scientific untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi pokok bahasan pasar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional 9 Mei 2015.

Kearney, S.P., & Perkins, T. (2014). Engaging students through assessment: the success and limitations of the ASPAL (Authentic Self and Peer Assessment for Learning) Model. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice.11(3).

Keyser, S. & Howell, S.L. (2008).The state of authentic assessment. Research Paper. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No ED 503679).

Kinay, I. & Bağçeci, B. (2016).The investigation of the effects of authentic assessment approach on prospective teachers’ problem-solving skills. International Education Studies; 9(8), 1913-9020.

Koyan, W. 2011. Asesmen dalam Pendidikan. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Press.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: SAGE publications.

Montgomery, R. J. Authentic Assessment Rubric for SIOP Lesson Plan. The University of Phoenix. June 22, 2008.

Moon, T.R., Brighton, C.M., Callahan, C.M., & Robinson, A. (2005).Development of Authentic Assessments for the Middle School Classroom. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2), 119–133.

Narayani, R., Gading, & Suartama. (2015). Analisis Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Menurut Pendekatan Saintifik dan Dampaknya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas 5. e-Journal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD, 3(1).

Neely, P & Tucker, J. (2012). Using business simulations as authentic assessment tools. American Journal of Business Education, 5(4), 449-56.

Noor, M. bin &Yusoff, N.M. (2016). Improving process writing with the use authentic assessment. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(3), 200-204.

Nurgiyantoro, B. 2011. Penilaian Otentik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Popham, W.J. (2011). Classroom assessment, what teacher needs to know. Boston: Pearson.

Resnick, B L. 1993. Standards, assessment, and educational quality. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan guru matematika sekolah menengah pertama dalam menerapkan kurikulum baru. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(3), 390-403.

Sani, R.A. (2016). Penilaian Autentik. Jakarta: PT BumiAksara. Stiggins, R.J. (1994). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. New York: Macmillan.

Wicks, D. & Lumpe, A. (2015), Electronic Portfolios as Pedagogy: Using Portfolios for Authentic Assessment of Teacher Knowledge and Skills in the U.S., in Cheryl J. Craig, Lily Orland-Barak (ed.) International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies (Part C) (Advances in Research on Teaching, Volume 22C) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.219 – 232.

Sumintono, B. & Subekti, N.B. (2014). Teacher in-service training and re-training in Indonesia. In K.G. Karras & C.C. Wolhuter (Eds). International handbook of teacher education: Training and re-training systems in modern world. (pp. 251-268). Cyprus: Studies and Publishing.

Widoyoko, E.P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i2.18885

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Social Media:

     


 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web
analytics
View Our Stats

Flag Counter