The realizing good governance through integrated services in the era of society 5.0

Rifai Rifai, Public Administration Study Program, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik (STISIP) Mbojo, Bima, Indonesia


Administrative services that often occur are considered low quality due to a lack of human resources, unclear time certainty, and inadequate infrastructure, thus giving a lousy assessment from the community. This is the background behind the formation of the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 24 of 2006 regarding PTSP (One Stop Integrated Implementation Guidelines) to improve the quality of public services to the community organized by the government. However, the implementation of PTSP has yet to be implemented in all Indonesian government institutions because several institutions still have difficulties and doubts about its effectiveness. This is the author's background to discuss the Effectiveness of One Stop Administration Services for the Community. This study aims to determine whether there is effectiveness and a level of value in providing administrative services for the community through a one-stop line or system in City Y. The method used is descriptive quantitative with data collection techniques, namely observation, and interview documentation. Moreover, a questionnaire was distributed to 100 respondents selected by purposive sampling. The study results show that the one-stop administrative service is quite effective at 30%. However, it is insignificant in its effectiveness because it still requires adaptation to the system and improvements in various ways. A country can gain knowledge, prepare for the future, and self-actualize its citizens from the competency perspective.


administration; public service, one-stop service; society 5.0

Full Text:



Angkat, K. M., Kadir, A., & Isnaini. (2018). Analisis pelayanan administrasi kependudukan pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Dairi. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), 7(1), 33–48.

Bonet, M., Fernández-Quijada, D., & Ribes, X. (2011). The changing nature of public service radio: A case study of iCat fm. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 177–192.

Cabalquinto, E. C. B., & Büscher, M. (2022). Between existential mobility and intimacy 5.0: translocal care in pandemic times. Media, Culture & Society, 016344372211192.

Donders, K., & Pauwels, C. (2008). Does EU policy challenge the digital future of public service broadcasting? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(3), 295–311.

Fashoyin, T. (2008). Management of disputes in the public service in Southern Africa. Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(4), 578–594.

Febliyani. Imelda, Fitriyah, N., & Paselle, E. (2017). Efektivitas pelayanan terpadu satu pintu terhadap penyerapan investasi di Kalimantan Timur (studi pada Badan Perijinan dan Penanaman Modal Daerah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur). Jurnal Administrative Reform, 2(3), 410–420.

Fitriyansyah, R., Djaenuri, A., & Mansyur. (2020). Efektivitas pelayanan terpadu satu pintu dalam meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan publik di Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu Provinsi Aceh. VISIONER : Jurnal Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia, 12(4), 685–694.

Frank, N. (2008). Measuring public service: Assessment and accountability—to ourselves and others. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(4), 499–506. Frans, M. M., Nayoan, H., & Sampe, S. (2022). Efektivitas penyelenggaraan pelayanan perizinan di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan (Studi Dinas Penanaman Modal dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan). GOVERNANCE, 2(1), 1–12. Fuhrel-

Forbis, A., Nadorff, P. G., & Snyder, L. B. (2009). Analysis of public service announcements on national television,. Social Marketing Quarterly, 15(1), 49–69.

Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., Anderfuhren-Biget, S., & Waldner, C. (2011). Putting public service motivation into context: a balance between universalism and particularism. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 227–253.

Ginting, L. M., Susanti, E., & Sumaryana, A. (2019). Implementasi pelayanan terpadu satu pintu non-perizinan di ukur dari kepuasan masyarakat dengan menggunakan indeks kepuasan masyarakat. Responsive, 1(2), 45–55.

Hansen, M. B., Steen, T., & Jong, M. de. (2013). New public management, public service bargains and the challenges of interdepartmental coordination: A comparative analysis of top civil servants in state administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(1), 29–48.

Hidayah, Y., Sapriya, S., Darmawan, C., & Malihah, E. (2020). Student organizations as voluntary groups in tertiary education: Enculturation and balancing political engagement for Indonesian generation Z. The International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies, 18(1), 1–12.

James, O., & Wilson, D. (2010). Introduction: Evidence from the comparison of public service performance. Evaluation, 16(1), 5–12.

Kim, T., Kim, K., & Kim, S. (2022). Undergraduate education in public administration and public service motivation: A quasi-experiment with the intervention of an introductory course. Teaching Public Administration, 014473942210844.

Koch, E. J., & Lomore, C. D. (2009). “This is a public service announcement”: Evaluating and redesigning campaigns to teach attitudes and persuasion. Teaching of Psychology, 36(4), 270–272.

Lundy, V. (2013). Project leadership influences resistance to change: The case of the Canadian public service. Project Management Journal, 44(4), 45–64.

Lutfi, D., Anisa, N., Norlaili, L., Shurur, M., Maulidia, R. N., & Ma’arif, S. (2019). Efektivitas pelayanan terpadu satu pintu berbasis masyarakat di Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Jombang. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 84–101.

Mjøs, O. J. (2011). Marriage of convenience? Public service broadcasters’ cross-national partnerships in factual television. International Communication Gazette, 73(3), 181–197.

Moon, M. J., Kim, G., & Lee, M. J. (2014). Korean public administration research 1999-2009: Research themes, methodologies, and scholarship. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(2), 151–167.

Muchabaiwa, W., & Chauraya, E. (2022). The gender blindness of the education 5.0 framework: An obstruction to promotion opportunities for female academics in Zimbabwe. Management in Education, 089202062211266.

Panizzon, M., & Barcellos, P. F. P. (2020). Critical success factors of the university of the future in a society 5.0: A maturity model. World Futures Review, 12(4), 410–426.

Podkalicka, A. (2008). Public service broadcasting as an infrastructure of translation in the age of cultural diversity: lessons for Europe from SBS Australia. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(3), 323–333.

Rahmawati, Z. E., & Kurniawan, I. D. (2021). Optimalisasi pelayanan administrasi kependudukan melalui inovasi loket desa di Desa Karanglor Kecamatan Manyarakat Kabupaten Wonogiri. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(3), 931–936.

Rudiansyah, Y. A., Argenti, G., & Febriantin, K. (2021). Kualitas pelayanan administrasi kependudukan pada masa pandemi covid 19 di dinas kependudukan dan pencatatan sipil. KINERJA, 18(4), 513–520.

Rukayat, Y. (2017). Kualitas pelayanan publik bidang administrasi kependudukan di Kecamatan Pasirjambu. Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Administrasi, 11(2).

Saputra, M., & Rahadian, A. H. (2018). Analisis efektivitas pelayanan administrasi terpadu kecamatan (paten) di Kecamatan Cimanggis, Kota Depok. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Mewujudkan Masyarakat Madani, 5(2), 165–173.

WarD, D. (2003). State aid or band aid? An evaluation of the European commission’s approach to public service broadcasting. . Media, Culture & Society, 25(2), 233–250.

Yang, B., Liu, B., Peng, J., & Liu, X. (2022). The impact of the embedded global value chain position on energy-biased technology progress: Evidence from chinas manufacturing. Technology in Society, 71, 102065.

Zaluchu, S. E. (2022). Church digitalization and the new koinonia in the era of the “Internet of Things.” International Bulletin of Mission Research.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:


Supported by:

RJI Main logo


Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan is published Univesitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Indonesia Association Profession of Pancasila and Civic Education/Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (AP3KnI).

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Civics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


j.civics stat