Eksekusi putusan hakim dalam sengketa perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman

Sri Hartini, Jurusan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta / Civic Education and Law Department, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Setiati Widihastuti, Jurusan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta / Civic Education and Law Department, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Iffah Nurhayati, Jurusan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta / Civic Education and Law Department, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia

Abstract


This article is based on research intended at describing the execution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency and its obstacles. It was a descriptive qualitative research. It was found that the excecution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency begins by accustion or submission of execution by appelant and ends  execution by confiscation. Its obstacle were: (1) its high cost as burdance of appelant; (2) the lack of qualified personels; and (3) the rivalry or rejection of accusted. The efforts to overcome these obstacles were: (1) the chief of regency court encourages both sides to compromise between initiator of accustion and his/her rival (accusted) peacefully; (2) send a  personel substitude of seizure in calling conflicting side and proposing aditional personels but not yet succesful; and (3) the persoel of seizure inform or sends the unsolved problem through electrinic devices to Sleman Regency in order to suspend its execution.


Keywords


eksekusi, putusan hakim, sengketa perdata, execution, verdict, private law

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD FULL TEXT

References


Harahap, M. Y. (1988). Ruang lingkup permasalahan eksekusi bidang perdata. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman. (2013). Buku rekapitulasi perkara perdata. Sleman.

Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-bab tentang penemuan hukum. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasution, S. (2003). Metode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sanafiah, F. (1995). Format-format penelitian sosial: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.16852

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Sri Hartini, Setiati Widihastuti, Iffah Nurhayati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:

           

Supported by:

RJI Main logo

 

Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan is published Univesitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Indonesia Association Profession of Pancasila and Civic Education/Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (AP3KnI).


Creative Commons License

Jurnal Civics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

j.civics stat