Eksekusi putusan hakim dalam sengketa perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.16852Keywords:
eksekusi, putusan hakim, sengketa perdata, execution, verdict, private lawAbstract
This article is based on research intended at describing the execution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency and its obstacles. It was a descriptive qualitative research. It was found that the excecution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency begins by accustion or submission of execution by appelant and ends execution by confiscation. Its obstacle were: (1) its high cost as burdance of appelant; (2) the lack of qualified personels; and (3) the rivalry or rejection of accusted. The efforts to overcome these obstacles were: (1) the chief of regency court encourages both sides to compromise between initiator of accustion and his/her rival (accusted) peacefully; (2) send a personel substitude of seizure in calling conflicting side and proposing aditional personels but not yet succesful; and (3) the persoel of seizure inform or sends the unsolved problem through electrinic devices to Sleman Regency in order to suspend its execution.
References
Harahap, M. Y. (1988). Ruang lingkup permasalahan eksekusi bidang perdata. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman. (2013). Buku rekapitulasi perkara perdata. Sleman.
Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-bab tentang penemuan hukum. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, S. (2003). Metode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sanafiah, F. (1995). Format-format penelitian sosial: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors transfer or license the copyright of publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraanas a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author's institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC-SA License.
