Eksekusi putusan hakim dalam sengketa perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/civics.v14i2.16852Keywords:
eksekusi, putusan hakim, sengketa perdata, execution, verdict, private lawAbstract
This article is based on research intended at describing the execution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency and its obstacles. It was a descriptive qualitative research. It was found that the excecution of verdict of private case in court of Sleman Regency begins by accustion or submission of execution by appelant and ends execution by confiscation. Its obstacle were: (1) its high cost as burdance of appelant; (2) the lack of qualified personels; and (3) the rivalry or rejection of accusted. The efforts to overcome these obstacles were: (1) the chief of regency court encourages both sides to compromise between initiator of accustion and his/her rival (accusted) peacefully; (2) send a personel substitude of seizure in calling conflicting side and proposing aditional personels but not yet succesful; and (3) the persoel of seizure inform or sends the unsolved problem through electrinic devices to Sleman Regency in order to suspend its execution.
References
Harahap, M. Y. (1988). Ruang lingkup permasalahan eksekusi bidang perdata. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman. (2013). Buku rekapitulasi perkara perdata. Sleman.
Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Bab-bab tentang penemuan hukum. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, S. (2003). Metode penelitian naturalistik kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sanafiah, F. (1995). Format-format penelitian sosial: Dasar-dasar dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to transfer the transfer copyright of the article to The Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan effective if and when the paper is accepted for publication.
Authors and other parties are bound to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License for the published articles, legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA).
