The construct validity and reliability of the lesson plan assessment instrument in primary schools

Lian Gafar Otaya, IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
Badrun Kartowagiran, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Heri Retnawati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/jpe.v8i2.33275

Abstract


This study aims to prove the construct validity of the lesson plan assessment instrument in primary schools. In addition, the purpose of this study is to estimate the reliability of lesson plan instruments in primary schools. This research uses a descriptive quantitative approach that is carried out on professional teacher education students at Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta and Universitas Islam Negeri Makassar. The subjects of this study were 516 randomly selected students. Data collection is done through documentation of the results of assessments from the field supervisor of each student. The data analysis technique used is confirmatory factor analysis and composites score reliability. The results showed that the lesson plan assessment instrument was measured by 25 items spread over 4 indicators. All items in the lesson plan assessment instrument indicators are construct valid after being tested through confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, the lesson plan assessment instrument in this study was reliable and had a fairly high construct reliability coefficient of 0.92.

Keywords


construct validity, reliability, lesson plan assessment

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References


Archer, A., & Hughes, C. (2011). Explicit instruction: efficient and effective teaching. New York: Guilford Publications.

Bahcivan, E., & Cobern, W. W. (2016). Investigating coherence among Turkish elementary science teachers’ teaching belief systems, pedagogical content knowledge and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(10), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n10.5

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., & Antoniou, P. (2012). Teacher professional development for improving quality of teaching. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Fernandes, H. J. X. (1984). Evaluation of educational program. Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluating and Curriculum Development.

Fouryza, D., Amin, S. M., & Ekawati, R. (2019). Designing lesson plan of integer number operation based on fun and easy math (FEM) approach. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8.i1

Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometrics: An introduction. USA: SAGE Publications.

Gareis, C. R., & Grant, L. W. (2014). The efficacy of training cooperating teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.007

Gerritsen, S., Plug, E., & Webbink, D. (2016). Teacher quality and student achievement: Evidence from a sample of Dutch Twins: Teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2539

Good, T. L. (2008). 21st century education: A reference handbook. California: Sage Publication Inc.

Goodwin, A. L. (2010). Curriculum as colonizer:(Asian) American Education in the current US context. Teachers College Record, 112(12), 3102–3138.

Herwin, H., & Mardapi, D. (2017). An emotion assessment model for elementary school students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.14504

Herwin, H., Tenriawaru, A., & Fane, A. (2019). Math elementary school exam analysis based on the Rasch model. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 7(2), 106–113.

LeCornu, R. (2016). Professional experience: learning from the past to build the future. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2015.1102200

Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Nasir, N., Sappaile, B. I., & Arafah, K. (2015). Pendeteksian pelaksanaan supervisi akademik pengawas sekolah pada SMA Negeri di Kota Baubau melalui Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori (CFA). In Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Tahunan Himpunan Evaluasi Pendidikan.

Nunnaly, J. C. (1981). Psychometric theory. New Delhi: Tata Mcgraw Hill Publishing Company Limited.

Orazbayeva, K. O. (2016). Professional competence of teachers in the age of globalization. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 2659–2672.

Rabadi-Raol, A. (2019). Quality of teacher education and learning: theory and practice. Journal of Education for Teaching., 115–117.

Retnawati, H. (2016a). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian: Panduan peneliti, mahasiswa dan psikometrian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Retnawati, H. (2016b). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Sanders, J. R., Nitko, A. J., Merwin, J. C., Trice, C., Dianda, M., & Schneider, J. (1990). Standars for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Collaborating Professional Associations: NCME, American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, American Federation of Teachers, and National Education Association.

Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Steinberg, M. P., & Garrett, R. (2016). Classroom composition and measured teacher performance: What do teacher observation scores really measure? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715616249

Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA USA: ASCD.

Widiati, U., & Hayati, N. (2015). Teacher professional education in Indonesia and ASEAN 2015: Lessons learned from English language teacher education programs. (R. Stroupe & K. Kimura, Eds.). ASEAN integration and the role of English language teaching.

Zhu, X., Goodwin, A. L., & Zhang, H. (2017). Quality of teacher education and learning: Theory and practice. Singapore: Springer Nature.

Ziegler, J., & Detje, F. (2012). Aplication of empirical methodology to evaluate information fusion aproaches. International Journal Methodology, 20, 327–337.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v8i2.33275

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Prima Edukasia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Prima Edukasia indexed by:

All rights reserved p-ISSN: 2338-4743 |e-ISSN: 2460-9927

Creative Commons LicenseJurnal Prima Edukasia by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpe/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View Prima Edukasia Journal Stats