An assessment instrument of mind map product to assess students' creative thinking skill

Regina Ratih Fardhila; Edi Istiyono

doi:10.21831/reid.v5i1.22525

An assessment instrument of mind map product to assess students' creative thinking skill

Regina Ratih Fardhila, Department of Educational Research and Evaluation, Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Edi Istiyono, Department of Educational Research and Evaluation, Graduate School of Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/reid.v5i1.22525

Abstract

Education is now more demanding for students to think more at a higher and more complex level. Mind map also builds creativity because it is more flexible in expressing ideas. The result of need assessment was the teachers cannot put on equation about creative thinking in test because the input of heterogeneous students, but they carried out project and practicum assessments, which required relatively much time, place and equipment. Therefore, the researchers develop instruments for assessing students' creative thinking skills at the high-school level trough mind map on valid and reliable biology subjects so that teachers can use them as a more efficient assessment tool. This research employed research and development (R&D) method; adapting ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model. Content validity was achieved using the Lawshe method; CVR formula, while the construct validity was achieved through exploratory factor analysis with the SPSS program and then confirm with confirmatory factor analysis using Lisrel program. It is found out that the construct validity was proven by the significant value of MSA and Loading Factor value. Suitability of the construct model with the data was indicate with p-value= 0.68 (≥0.05); Root Mean Square Error Approximation = 0.00 (≤0.08); and Goodness of Fit Index= 0.94 (>0.90). The reliability of the instrument is 0.774, which means reliable. The assessment instrument of mind map product to assess creative thinking skill of students at the high school level in biology subjects has ten fit items in four factors; Flexibility, Elaboration, Originality, and Fluency.

Keywords

product assessment; mind map; creative thinking skill

Full Text:

PDF

References

Azwar, S. (2004). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bilson, S. (2005). Analisis multivariat pemasaran. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Buzan, T. (2011). Buku pintar mind map. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Çoban, S., & Tokatlı, E. S. (2017). The effect of mind mapping technique on students’ achievements in music lesson and on their attitudes towards the mind mapping technique. Education and Science, 42(190), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6856

DePorter, B., & Henarcki, M. (2010). Quantum teaching. Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka.

Gable, R. K. (1986). Development in the affective domain. Boston, MA: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hartati, D. R., Asrial, & Ernawati, D. W. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian berpikir kreatif peserta didik pada materi larutan asam dan basa kelas XI SMA/MA. Artikel Ilmiah, 1–10.

Herlina, L., & Qurbaniah, M. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi virus kelas X MAS Al-Mustaqim Sungai Raya 2. Jurnal Bioeducation, 2(1), 11–14.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424

Hudha, S. A., & Mardapi, D. (2018). Developing an instrument for measuring the spiritual attitude of high school students. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i1.20304

Hyerle, D. (2012). Peta pemikiran (thinking maps) sebagai suatu bahasa transformasional untuk pembelajaran. In N. D. Hyerle & L. Alper (Eds.), Peta pemikiran (thinking maps): Penelitian berbasis sekolah, hasil dan model untuk prestasi dengan menggunakan peralatan visual (2nd ed.). (A. Cahyani, Trans.) Jakarta: PT. Indeks.

Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/249498

Kristiani, K. D., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2017). Pengembangan ssesmen keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP Negeri 5 Madiun pada materi cahaya dan alat optik. In Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya) (pp. 102–108). Indonesia.

Laili, M., & Otok, B. W. (2014). Second-order confirmatory factor analysis pada kemiskinan di Kabupaten Jombang. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 3(2), 278–283. https://doi.org/10.12962/J23373520.V3I2.8161

Moore, K. D. (2015). Effective instructional strategies: From theory to practice (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan kreatifitas anak berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Murley, D. (2007). Technology for everyone...: Mind mapping complex information. Law Journal Library, 99(1), 175–183.

Putri, A. R., Paidi, P., & Subali, B. (2016). Kemampuan berpikir divergen keterampilan proses sains aspek biologi siswa SD berdasarkan lokasi sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(5), 39–50.

Putri, L. O. L. (2016). Mind map sebagai model pembelajaran menilai penguasaan konsep dan alat evaluasi menilai kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. In Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Pendidikan dan Saintek (pp. 629–634). Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Retrieved from https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/7980

Regulation of Minister of Education and Culture, No. 14 of 2018, on Student Admissions (2018). Republic of Indonesia.

Retnawati, H. (2015). Validitas reliabilitas dan karakteristik butir (Panduan untuk peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Riadi, E. (2018). Statistik SEM structural equation modeling dengan Lisrel. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Santrock, J. W. (2014). Psikologi pendidikan. (D. Angelica, Trans.). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Sari, A. A., & Jarnawi, A. D. (2008). Pengaruh pemberian tugas creative mind map setelah pembelajaran terhadap kemampuan kreativitas dan koneksi matematik siswa. In Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian & pengembangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Supardi, Haryanto, & Suhendri, H. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen pengukuran karakter kreativitas siswa. In Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Hasil-Hasil Penelitian (SNHP-IV) Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas PGRI Semarang (pp. 290–297). Semarang.

Supranto. (2004). Analisis multivariat arti dan interpretasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

Yusnaeni, Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning integrated with metacognitive strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10216a

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i1.22525