Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Praktik Kerja Industri Siswa Kompetensi Keahlian Jasa Boga SMK N 3 Purworejo

Dwi Sapitri Iriani, Guru SMK N 3 Purworejo, Indonesia
Soeharto Soeharto, Dosen Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aims to investigate and evaluate: 1) component of context; 2) component of input; 3) component of process; and 4) component of product. The study employed the CIPP model. The research subjects were 65 respondents. The data were collected through a questionnaire, observations, interviews, and documentation. The quantitative data were processed descriptively using SPSS 16.0 program for Windows. The results of the study showed that for context component, there were 34.9% students who strongly agreed, 61.5% who agreed. There were 75% supervising teachers who strongly agreed, 25% who agreed. 100% BS/IS supervisors strongly agreed. The input component, there were 51% students who strongly agreed, 48.8% who agreed. There were supervising 87.5% teachers who strongly agreed, 12.5% who agreed. 100% BS/IS supervisors strongly agreed. The process component, there were 30.2% students who strongly agreed, 48.8% who agreed. There were 62.5% supervising teachers who strongly agreed, 37.5% who agreed. 100% BS/IS supervisors strongly agreed. The product component, there were 41.9% students who strongly agreed, 58.1% who agreed. There were 75.0% supervising teachers who strongly agreed, 25.0% who agreed. 100% BS/IS supervisors strongly agreed. In conclusion, all indicators in each component have been suitable with the implementation of the industrial work practicum in SMK N 3 Purworejo.

Keywords


Applied Curriculum, Implementation of the Industrial Work Practicum, CIPP

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian (suatu pendekatan praktik). Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta

Depdiknas. 2003. Undang – Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, Tentang Sistem

Pendidikan Nasional

Depdiknas. 2005. Panduan praktik kerja industri, Jakarta: Dikmenjur

Depdiknas. 2005. Pendidikan sistem ganda, Jakarta: Dikmenjur

Issac, S & Michael, W.B. 1984. Handbook in research and evaluation. California:

Edits Publishing

Kerlinger F.N dan Lee H.B. 2000. Foundation of behavioural research, (4rd ed). California: Harcounut College Publishers

Program Pasca Sarjana. 2011 Pedoman tesis dan disertasi. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Prosser, CA. 1949. Prinsip pendidikan vokasional, diambil pada hari selasa

tanggal 11 maret 2014 dari http://1ptk.blogspot.com/2011/11/prinsip -pendidikan-vokasional-dari.html

Saifuddin Azwar. 2003. Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Stufflebeam D. L. & Skinfield A. J. 1984.

Sistematic evaluation. United States of Amerika: Kluwer Nijhoff Publhising

Stufflebeam, DL. 2002. CIPP:a mode for program evaluation. Diambil pada

tanggal 9 Oktober 2012 dari http://GG.218.71.225/search/cache

--------- 2006. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22,

Tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi

--------- 1990. peraturan pemerintah nomor 29 tentang Pendidikan Menengah

Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v22i3.6835

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



 

Online (e-ISSN): 2477-2410 || Printed (p-ISSN): 0854-4735

Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jptk was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Supported by:

Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Managemen

Social Media: