Studi etnografi pendidikan pada SMA Negeri 6 Yogyakarta: ketahanan dan ketidaktahanan belajar kelompok

Novi Trilisiana; Sugeng Bayu Wahyono

doi:10.21831/jitp.v4i2.11771

Studi etnografi pendidikan pada SMA Negeri 6 Yogyakarta: ketahanan dan ketidaktahanan belajar kelompok

Novi Trilisiana, Prodi Teknologi Pembelajaran PPs Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sugeng Bayu Wahyono, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jitp.v4i2.11771

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengungkapkan kontribusi ketahanan dan ketidaktahanan belajar kelompok siswa SMA Negeri 6 Yogyakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang mengacu pada penelitian etnografi di sekolah. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi terlibat, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi. Data yang terkumpul dibuat ke dalam transkrip, pengkodean, serta pemunculan tema. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan konsep dinamika kelompok dan belajar kooperatif. Hasil penelitian ini mengidentifikasi adanya dua kondisi belajar kelompok, dimana minoritas kelompok siswa menunjukkan ketahanan sedangkan mayoritas menunjukkan ketidaktahanan. Ketahanan belajar kelompok dapat tercipta karena adanya kesadaran kolektif, saling percaya, saling bekerja sama, dan tanggung jawab antar anggota. Ketidaktahanan belajar kelompok dapat tercipta karena adanya egosentrisme, sekadar formalitas, saling bersaing, dan pragmatisme belajar. Semakin cepat terjadinya transformasi dari faktor yang melemahkan kelompok kepada kepentingan kelompok, semakin lama ketahanan belajar kelompok, dan begitu sebaliknya.

Kata kunci: etnografi, dinamika kelompok, ketahanan, ketidaktahanan, belajar kelompok

ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF EDUCATION AT SMA NEGERI 6 YOGYAKARTA: THE DURABILITY AND NOT DURABILITY OF STUDY GROUPS

Abstract

This article concerns a research aimed at revealing durability of study group contributions and contribution of the not durability of study groups at SMA Negeri 6 Yogyakarta. This study was qualitative research referring to the ethnography in school. The data were collected through participant observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The collected data were interpreted into transcript, coded, and thematized. The data were analyzed by using the concepts of group dynamics and cooperative learning. The results of the study identified two conditions of study groups that minority groups of students showed durable while the majority showed not durable. The durability of study groups could be created because there are a collective awareness, mutual trust, mutual cooperation and responsibility among the members. The not durability of study groups could be created because there are students’ egocentrism, formality, competing and pragmatism in learning. The faster the transformation from the factors that weaken the group to the benefit of the group, the longer durability study groups, and vice versa

Keywords: ethnography, group dynamics, durability, not durability, study groups

Keywords

etnografi; dinamika kelompok; ketahanan; ketidaktahanan; belajar kelompok

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Acar, B., & Tarhan, L. (2007). Effect of cooperative learning strategies on students' understanding of concepts in electrochemistry. International Journal of science and mathematics education, 5(2), 349-373.

Adkinson, J. E. (2007). Does cooperative learning affect girls' and boys' learning and attitudes toward mathematic transformation skills in single -sex and mixed -sex classrooms? (Disertasi doktor, University of South Alabama, 2007). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304762732).

Anggita, D. R. (2014). Dinamika konstruksi nilai kelompok pelajar sekolah menengah atas Yogyakarta (studi fenomenologis konstruksi nilai kelompok pada GNB di SMA Negeri 6 Yogyakarta). Skripsi, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Barrow, G., Bradshaw, E., & Newton, T. (2001). Improving behaviour and raising self-esteem in the classroom: A practical guide to using transactional analysis. Great Britain: David Fulton Publisher.

Bogdan, R. & Taylor, S. J. (1992). Pengantar metode penelitian kualitatif. (Terjemahan Arief Furchan). Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Burress, M. D., & Peters, J. M. (2015). Collaborative Learning in a Japanese Language Course: Student and Teacher Experiences. SAGE Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015581016

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif & desain riset: memilih di antara lima pendekatan (Terjemahan Ahmad Lintang Lazuardi). (edisi ketiga). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Darmadi, H. (2014). Metode penelitian pendidikan dan sosial. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39–49.

Hammersley, M. (1994). Etnografi ruang kelas: Esai empiris dan metodologis. (Terjemahan Warsono). Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (2010). Collaborative Learning: Strategi pembelajaran untuk sukses bersama (Terjemahan Narulita Yusron). Bandung: Nusa Media.

Johnson, S. L. L. (2013). The impact of cooperative and traditional learning on the academic achievement of third grade students in selected rural school districts in Northeast, South Carolina (Disertasi doktor, South Carolina State University, 2013). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1586074629).

Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik (penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Langer, G. M., Colton, A. B., & Goff, L.S. (2003). Collaborative analysis of student work: Improving teaching and learning. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) Publications.

Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. (G. W. Lewin, Ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.

Miarso, Y. (2009). Menyemai benih teknologi pendidikan. Cetakan ke 5. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.467

Munir, B. (2001). Dinamika kelompok: Penerapannya dalam laboratorium ilmu perilaku. Palembang: Percetakan Universitas Sriwijaya.

Nam, C. W. (2008). The relative effectiveness of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement, interaction, and attitude in online cooperative learning (Disertasi doktor, Texas A&M University, 2008). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (288105869).

Pradipta, A. W. & Sofyan, H. (2015). Implementasi PBL untuk meningkatkan motivasi, kreativitas, dan pemahaman konsep. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 2(1), 32-48.

Raphael, C., Bachen, C. M., & Hernández-Ramos, P. F. (2012). Flow and cooperative learning in civic game play. New Media & Society, 14(8), pp. 1321–1338.

Sanjaya, W. (2010). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Schaefer, R. T. (2012). Sosiologi buku 1. (Terjemahan Anton Novenanto, Diah tantri Dwiandani). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Humanika.

Shoval, E., & Shulruf, B. (2011). Who benefits from cooperative learning with movement activity?. School Psychology International, 32(1), 58–72.

Siswoyo, D. (2008). Ki Hadjar Dewantara: peletak dasar pendidikan nasional. In D. Siswoyo (Ed.), Ilmu Pendidikan (pp. 163-171). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Slavin, R. E. (2009). Cooperative learning: Teori, riset dan praktik (Terjemahan Lita). London: Allyn dan Bacon.

Stahl, R. J. (Ed.). (1994). Coopetaive learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Varvarigou, M. (2016). ‘I owe it to my group members… Who critically commented on my conducting’–cooperative learning in choral conducting education. International Journal of Music Education, 34(1), 116–130.

Whitener, J. L. (2016). Using the elements of cooperative learning in school band classes in the United States. International Journal of Music Education, 34 (2) 219–233.

Williams, C. A. (2013). Relative advantage and, simplicity as predictors of the adoption of cooperative learning practices (Disertasi doktor, Welden University, 2013). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1353672107).

Wilson, M. L. (2014). Team-based learning. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 142(1), 4–4. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPAYGZDC2ZHS7W

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v4i2.11771