The Effect of Market Structure on Bank Performance in Central Java

Imanuel Madea Sakti

doi:10.21831/economia.v16i1.30150

The Effect of Market Structure on Bank Performance in Central Java

Imanuel Madea Sakti, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Indonesia

10.21831/economia.v16i1.30150

Abstract

Abstract: The research on the Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) hypothesis in the banking industry has been done many times, including in Indonesia. However, it still focuses on commercial banks. This research aims to examine the relationship between market structure and bank performance by involving commercial banks and rural banks (Bank Perkreditan Rakyat/BPR) when they are in the same market in the regency/city level. It uses panel data from 565 banks in Central Java: 261 BPR and 304 Commercial Banks, divided into 34 regencies/cities during 2012-2016. Independent variables involve market concentration and market share which is also as moderating variable, and the dependent variable is bank performance. The hypotheses are examined by multiple linear regression with a random effect model. In general, the results support that the market structure has a significant positive effect on bank performance. Another result has found no collusive behavior among dominant banks.

Keywords: Structure-Conduct-Performance, Commercial Bank, Rural Bank, Market Structure, Bank Performance

Pengaruh Struktur Pasar terhadap Kinerja Bank di Jawa Tengah

Abstrak: Penelitian mengenai hipotesis Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) pada industri perbankan telah banyak dilakukan, termasuk di Indonesia. Namun, penelitian tersebut hanya berfokus pada bank umum saja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara struktur pasar dan kinerja bank dengan melibatkan bank umum dan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) ketika berada di pasar yang sama di tingkat kabupaten/kota. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel terdiri dari 565 bank di Jawa Tengah: 261 BPR dan 304 Bank umum, yang terbagi ke dalam 34 kabupaten/kota selama tahun 2012-2016. Variabel independen yaitu konsentrasi pasar dan pangsa pasar yang sekaligus sebagai variabel moderasi, dan variabel dependen adalah kinerja bank. Hipotesis diuji menggunakan regresi linier berganda dengan random effect model. Secara umum, hasil mendukung bahwa struktur pasar berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kinerja bank. Hasil lainnya menunjukkan tidak terdapat perilaku kolusif di antara bank-bank besar.

Kata kunci: . Structure-Conduct-Performance, Bank Umum, BPR, Struktur Pasar, Kinerja Bank.

Keywords

Structure-Conduct-Performance; Commercial Bank; Rural Bank; Market Structure; Bank Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ab-Rahim, R., & Chiang, S. N. (2016). Market structure and performance of Malaysian banking industry. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-11-2014-0086

Al-Muharrami, S., & Matthews, K. (2009). Market power versus efficient-structure in Arab GCC banking. Applied Financial Economics, 19(18), 1487–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100902845478

Bain, J. S. (1951). Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936–1940. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293–324. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882217

Bank Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 14/2/PBI/2012 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 11/11/PBI/2009 tentang Penyelenggaraan kegiatan alat pembayaran dengan menggunakan kartu. Retrieved from https://www.bi.go.id/elicensing/helps/PBI 14.2.2012 - APMK.pdf

Bank Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Anggota Dewan Gubernur No. 20/21/PADG/2018 tentang Laporan penyelenggaraan kegiatan alat pembayaran dengan menggunakan kartu dan uang elektronik (electronic money) oleh Bank Perkreditan Rakyat dan lembaga selain bank. Retrieved from https://www.bi.go.id/id/peraturan/moneter/Documents/PADG_202118.pdf

Berger, A. N. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking: Tests of market-power and efficient-structure hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(2), 404. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077876

Berger, A. N., & Hannan, T. H. (1989). The price-concentration relationship in banking. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926975

Berger, A. N., & Hannan, T. H. (1997). Using efficiency measures to distinguish among alternative explanations of the structure-performance relationship in banking. Managerial Finance, 23(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb018599

Bhatti, G. A., & Hussain, H. (2010). Evidence on structure conduct performance hypothesis in Pakistani commercial banks. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(9), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n9p174

Chaerani, N., Cotoro, M., & Achmad, D. (2019). Struktur pasar dan kinerja: Studi kasus pada bank umum di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 4(3), 375–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v4i3.276

Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. The Journal of Law & Economics, 16(1), 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/724822

Deyoung, R., Hunter, W. C., & Udell, G. F. (2004). The past, present, and probable future for community banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 25(2–3), 85–133. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:fina.0000020656.65653.79

Garza-Garcia, J. G. (2012). Does market power influence bank profits in Mexico? A study on market power and efficiency. Applied Financial Economics, 22(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2011.595681

González, L. O., Razia, A., Búa, M. V., & Sestayo, R. L. (2019). Market structure, performance, and efficiency: Evidence from the MENA banking sector. International Review of Economics & Finance, 64, 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.05.013

Hafidz, Januar Sagita Rachmanira, O. T. (2013). Tingkat persaingan dan efisiensi bank umum dan BPR di pasar kredit mikro di Indonesia.

Heggestad, A. A., & Mingo, J. J. (1976). Prices, nonprices, and concentration in commercial banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 8(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.2307/1991923

Irawati, D. (2017). Struktur pasar, efisiensi, dan kinerja perbankan Indonesia.

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. (2013). PKPPU No. 02 tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan ketiga atas PKPPU No. 13 tahun 2010 tentang Pedoman pelaksanaan tentang penggabungan atau peleburan badan usaha dan pengambilalihan saham perusahaan yang dapat mengakibatkan terjadinya praktik monopoli dan per. Retrieved from https://www.kppu.go.id/docs/Merger/Perkom 02 Tahun 2013.pdf

Kontan.co.id. (2019). Bila ingin terbitkan kartu ATM, BPR mesti gandeng bank umum. Retrieved from https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/bila-ingin-terbitkan-kartu-atm-bpr-mesti-gandeng-bank-umum

Mason, E. (1939). Price and production policies of large scale enterprises. American Economic Review, 39(1), 61–74.

Nabieu, G. A. A. (2013). The structure, conduct and performance of commercial banks in Ghana. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 1(4), 34–47.

Neuberger, D. (1997). Structure, conduct and performance in banking markets.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Statistik Perbankan Indonesia Juni 2017.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019a). POJK No. 41/POJK.03/2019 tentang Penggabungan, peleburan, pengambilalihan, integrasi, dan konversi bank umum. Retrieved from POJK nomor 41/POJK.03/2019%0Ahttps://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Penggabungan%2C-Peleburan%2C-Pengambilalihan%2C-Integrasi%2C--dan-Konversi-Bank-Umum/POJK 41-2019.pdf%0A

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019b). Siaran pers OJK dorong konsolidasi BPR dan program ketahanan pangan di Sumatera Barat. Retrieved from https://ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Documents/Pages/Siaran-Pers-OJK-Dorong-Konsolidasi-BPR-dan-Program-Ketahanan-Pangan-di-Sumatera-Barat/SP - OJK DORONG KONSOLIDASI BPR DAN PROGRAM KETAHANAN PANGAN DI SUMATERA BARAT.pdf

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019c). Siaran pers OJK dorong penguatan BPR: Peresmian merger BPR di Kabupaten Cirebon. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/siaran-pers/Documents/Pages/Siaran-Pers-OJK-Dorong-Penguatan-BPR/SP - OJK Dorong Penguatan BPR.pdf

Peltzman, S. (1977). The gains and losses from industrial concentration. The Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1086/466902

Rettab, B., Kashani, H., Obay, L., & Rao, A. (2010). Impact of market power and efficiency on performance of banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 50(February 2014), 190–203.

Rhoades, S. A. (1982). Welfare loss, redistribution effect, and restriction of output due to monopoly in banking. Journal of Monetary Economics, 9(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(82)90024-1

Sathye, M. (2005). Market structure and performance in Australian banking. Review of Accounting and Finance, 4(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb043425

Short, B. K. (1979). The relation between commercial bank profit rates and banking concentration in Canada, Western Europe, and Japan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 3(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(79)90016-5

Smirlock, M. (1985). Evidence on the (non) relationship between concentration and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992507

Tregenna, F. (2009). The fat years: The structure and profitability of the US banking sector in the pre-crisis period. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(4 SPEC. ISS.), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v16i1.30150