Email this article 
DESIGN AND MULTIMEDIA LEARNING PRINCIPLES ON MOOC INDONESIAX
Imam Santosa, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Achmad Syarief, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Irfansyah Irfansyah, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Abstract
The “Kampus Merdeka” or “Freedom Campus” policy from the Indonesian Ministry of Education gives students the freedom to participate in learning activities outside their study program. Learning resources can be obtained from online-based learning. One online learning resource is MOOC (Massive Online Open Course), which has gained massive participation. Good quality learning materials can help students construct their knowledge. Indonesian MOOC providers have developed their learning materials, but they are still not optimal in quality. This study aims to analyze the implementation of design and multimedia principles on Indonesian MOOC’s learning materials. The research used a quantitative strategy with the data collection method of visual observation of the IndonesiaX materials compared to those of edX, Udemy, and Coursera materials. Data analysis was based on the visual analysis of 9 design principles and 12 multimedia learning principles. In this research, the findings reveal that the design consistency and icon representation principles are yet to have an optimal grade. The same conditions are also found in implementing the multimedia principles of coherence, redundancy, and modality. The findings in this study are expected to be a consideration for MOOC providers in designing better online learning materials.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adriyanto, A. R., Santosa, I., & Syarief, A. (2019). Memahami perilaku generasi Z sebagai dasar pengembangan materi pembelajaran daring. [Understanding generation Z’s behavior as a basis for developing online learning materials]. Seni, Teknologi dan Masyarakat, 2, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.33153/semhas.v2i0.116.
Adriyanto, A. R., Santosa, I., & Syarief, A. (2020). Evaluasi heuristik sistem pengelolaan pembelajaran daring perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. [Heuristic evaluation of higher education online learning management systems in Indonesia]. ANDHARUPA: Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual & Multimedia, 6(02), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.33633/andharupa.v6i02.3592.
Albó, L., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2019). Conceptualizing a visual representation model for MOOC-based blended learning designs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5178.
Atmaja, F. D., & Firman, A. (2015). Perincian parameter usability tipe pengguna browser dan evaluator pada situs web e-commerce Indonesia. [Details of usability parameters for browser user and evaluator types on Indonesian e-commerce websites]. (Undergraduate Thesis, Institut Pertanian Bogor). http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/76039.
Belcher, T. G. (2018). The effects of randomized appearance of text chunks in nurse eLearning lessons (Doctoral Dissertation, Kansas State University). https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/38658.
Berliyanto, B., & Santoso, H. B. (2018). Indonesian perspective on massive open online courses: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.11.
Bowen, A., Ellis, J., & Chaparro. B. (2017). Long nav or short nav? Student responses to two different navigational interface designs in LibGuides version 2. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.002.
Culbertson, G., Shen, S., Andersen, E., & Jung, M. (2017, February). Have your cake and eat it too: Foreign language learning with a crowdsourced video captioning system. Paper presented at the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, Portland Oregon USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998268.
Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballe, S. (2013, 28-30 October). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. Paper presented at the 2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Compiegne, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.37.
Divayana, D. G. H. (2017). Evaluasi pemanfaatan e-learning di Universitas Teknologi Indonesia menggunakan model CSE-UCLA. [Evaluation of the use of e-learning at the Universitas Teknologi Indonesia using the CSE-UCLA model]. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.12853.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014, 4-5 March). How video production affects student engagement. Paper presented at the First ACM Conference on Learning, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239.
Herrlinger, S., Höffler, T. N., Opfermann, M., & Leutner, D. (2017). When do pictures help learning from expository text? Multimedia and modality effects in primary schools. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9525-y.
Johnston, T. C. (2015). Lessons from MOOCS: Video lectures and peer assessment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19(2), 91–97. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/aeljvol19no22015.pdf.
Kizilcec, R. F., Bailenson, J. N., & Gomez, C. J. (2015). The instructor’s face in video instruction: Evidence from two large-scale field studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000013.
Kurniasari, F., Jusuf, E., & Gunardi, A. (2018). The readiness of Indonesian toward MOOC system. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1631–1636. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.15431.
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design. Singapore: Rockport Publishers.
Lubis, A. H., Idrus, S. Z. S., & Rashid, S. A. (2020). The exposure of MOOC usage in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(2), 2716–2720. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/feb2020/The-Exposure-Of-Mooc-Usage-In-Indonesia.pdf.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison-Jones, N., & North, T. L. (2019). Typographic effect on learning management system effectiveness. World Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.22158/wjer.v6n2p321.
Muller, D. A., Lee, K. J., & Sharma, M. D. (2008). Coherence or interest: Which is most importantin online multimedia learning? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1223.
Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability inspection methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Suciati, S. (2017). Interaksi kesiapan belajar dan kepuasan terhadap layanan pada pembelajaran online program pascasarjana. [Interaction between learning readiness and satisfaction and the learning service in a graduate online learning program]. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i1.12733.
Thorngate, S., & Hoden, A. (2017). Exploratory usability testing of user interface options in LibGuides 2. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 844–861. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.844.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.34699
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Social Media:
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.
