INCREASING SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH PRINCIPALS’ LEADERSHIP AND TEACHERS’ TEACHING PERFORMANCE, IS IT POSSIBLE?

Heni Mulyani, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Danny Meirawan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Annisa Rahmadani, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Abstract


Efforts to achieve educational goals can’t be separated from the performance of schools in realizing these goals, to achieve this involves many parties and factors that influence it. This study aims to describe the impact of principal’s leadership and teacher’s teaching performance in an effort to increase school effectiveness. This research uses a quantitative approach with a survey method. Population are 466 schools, samples of 210 schools were taken by proportionated stratified random sampling technique, and a total of 2,730 respondents consisted of principals, teachers, students, and school committees. The instrument used was a questionnaire, data processing techniques using the Structural Equation Model. The results indicate that principals’ leadership and teachers’ teaching performance positively and significantly influence school effectiveness, which means that school effectiveness directly determined by the presence of effective principal’s leadership and high teacher teaching performance. The principal's leadership as a driver variable is proven to be able to trigger the teaching performance of teachers to increase school effectiveness. The high effectiveness of this school is inseparable from the effective teacher’s teaching performance. Teachers' teaching performance must be continuously improved to improve school effectiveness. This teaching performance can be improved through the principal's leadership role.


Keywords


school effectiveness; principal leadership; teaching performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


AASA (Association of American Schools in South America). (2010). Handbook on the OSAC/AASSA: Teacher performance evaluation system. South America: Author.

Adeyemi, T. (2010). Organizational climate and teachers' job performance in primary schools in Ondo State, Nigeria: An analytical survey. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 7(4), 138-145. doi:ajit.2008.138.145.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek. [Research procedure: A practical approach]. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458-474. doi:10.4236/jss.2017.55015.

CCSSO (Council of Chief State School Officers). (2013). InTASC Model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0. Washington, DC: Author.

Cheng, Y. C. (2013). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.

Danim, S. (2007). Visi baru manajemen sekolah: Dari unit birokrasi ke lembaga akademik. [The new vision of school management: From the bureaucracy unit to the academic institution]. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Dubrin, A. (2010). Leadership. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal's time use and school effectiveness. American journal of education, 116(4), 491-523. doi:10.1086/653625.

Hoy, W. K. (nd). School effectiveness index (SE-Index). https://www.waynekhoy.com/school-effectiveness/.

Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Huber, S. G., & Muijs, D. (2010). School leadership effectiveness: The growing insight in the importance of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and their pupils. In Huber, S. G. (Ed.). School leadership-international perspectives.Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 57-77. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3501-1.

Ladd, H. F., & Walsh, R. P. (2002). Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness: Getting the incentives right. Economics of Education review, 21(1), 1-17. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00039-X.

Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School leadership and management, 28(1), 27-42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060.

Lezotte, L. W., & Snyder, K. M. (2011). What effective schools do: Re-envisioning the correlates. Bloomington, Indiana: Solution Tree Press.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). The principal as instructional leader. National forum of educational and supervision journal, 27(4), 1-7. https://schoolturnaroundsupport.org/.

Mulyasa. (2002). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. [School Based Management]. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. Los Angeles: Sage publications.

Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational administration quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509.

Selamat, N., Samsu, N. Z., & Kamalu, N. S. M. (2013). The impact of organizational climate on teachers' job performance. Educational Research, 2(1), 1-12. doi:10.5838/erej.2013.21.06.

Shen, J., Leslie, J. M., Spybrook, J. K., & Ma, X. . (2012). Are principal background and school processes related to teacher job satisfaction? A multilevel study using schools and staffing survey 2003-2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 200-230. doi:10.3102/0002831211419949.

Soetopo, H. (2010). Perilaku organisasi. [Organizational Behavior]. Jakarta: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Spencer, M. L., & Spencer, M. S. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. New York, NY: John Wiley & Son, Inc.

Steers, R. (1985). Organizational effectiveness. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Stupak, R. J. (2008). Symposium on the future of public administration: Assumptions, processes, and projections part I. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 11(3), 316-325. https://www.emerald.com/.

TDT (Teacher Development Trust). (2015). Developing great teaching: Lessons from the international reviews into effective professional development. London: Author.

Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Reynolds, D. (2002). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Ed.). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 174-200.

Teddlie, C. & Stringfield, S. (2007). A history of school effectiveness and improvement research in the USA focusing on the past quarter century. In T. Townsend (Ed.). International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 131-166. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2.

Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Yu, F. (2006). The international system for teacher observation and feedback: Evolution of an international study of teacher effectiveness constructs. Educational research and evaluation, 12(6), 561-582. doi:10.1080/13803610600874067.

Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 217-247. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330501.

Uben, G. C. & Hughes, L. W. (1992). The principal: Creative leadership for effective school. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. doi:10.1177/019263658707150024.

Uline, C. L., Miller, D. M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(4), 462-483. doi:10.1177/0013161X98034004002.

Utomo, H. B., Suminar, D. R., & Hamidah, H. (2019). Capturing teaching motivation of teacher in the disadvantaged areas. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 398-410. doi:10.21831/cp.v38i3.26411.

Vinitwatanakhun, W. (Apr. 2002). Factors affecting organizational effectiveness of nursing institutes in Thailand. Au Journal of Technology, 5(4), 207-211. http://www.journal.au.edu/.

Yankey, J. A., & McClellan, A. (2003). The nonprofit board's role in planning and evaluation. Washington, DC: BoardSource.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28864

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Social Media:

     


 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web
    analytics
View Our Stats