Personal social responsibility in ecological citizenship: Dimensionality and scale measurement with Aiken Index Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i2.76295

Keywords:

ecological citizenship, measuring scale, personal social responsibility

Abstract

Personal social responsibility emphasises the importance of positively benefiting society, including the environment. Responsibility is one of the values influencing ecological citizenship so that individuals can prioritise environmental issues and realise the importance of sustainable living. This research aims to develop an instrument for personal social responsibility in ecological citizenship as a measurement scale. The instrument's contents are validated by experts (expert judgment), and the test is then performed using the Aiken-V formula. The research results show that: 1) The dimensions of personal social responsibility in ecological citizenship are determined by  indicators, namely a) Have an interest in considering environmental issues and resolving environmental issues; b) Have an interest in sustainable behavior in protecting and preserving the environment; c) Have awareness in considering and resolving environmental issues; d) Have awareness of sustainable behavior in protecting and preserving the environment; e) Actively participate in considering environmental issues and resolving environmental issues; f) Actively participate in sustainable behavior in protecting and preserving the environment; g) Take collective action in considering environmental issues and resolving environmental issues; h) Take sustainable collective action in protecting and preserving the environment; 2) The results of content validation using the Aiken V coefficient show that the 60 items have a very high level of validity, because they meet the criterion index of 0.80 < V ≤ 1.00. Further research should be able to examine public policy and develop environmental education and awareness.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419

Azwar, S. (2019). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Babutau I.C. (2014). Responsabilitatea socială a individului-voluntariat. Retrieved from http://carpevita.uvvg.ro/images/materiale_consiliere/Responsabilitatea%20sociala%20a%20individului%20-%20voluntariat.pdf 

Davis, S. L. (2017). Personal social responsibility: measurement, dimensions and relations with corporate social responsibility. Dissertation: Universidad De Murcia, Facultad De Economía Y Empresa Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Empresa Departamento de Comercialización e Investigación de Mercados: Murcia

Davis, S.L, Rivesb, L.M., de Mayaa, R.S. (2017). Introducing personal social responsibility as a key element to upgrade CSR. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC. 21(1), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjme.2017.04.001 

DellaVigna S., List J. A., Malmendier U. (2012). Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (1), 1-56. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~ulrike/Papers/charsocpress10-06-17.pdf

Ecimovic T., et.al. (2013). The corporate and individual social responsibility (C&ISR)- a part of the sustainable future of humankind. Age of Globalization, 3, 132-142. https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/files/aog/2013_3/132-142.pdf 

Eden, S. E. (1993). Individual environmental responsibility and its role in public environmentalism. Environment and Planning A, 25(12), 1743-1758. https://doi.org/10.1068/a251743

Ellingsen, T  & Johannesson, M. (2011). Conspicuous generosity. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (9-10), 1131- 1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.002

Estrada-Vidal, L. I., Olmos-Gómez, M. D. C., López-Cordero, R., & Ruiz-Garzón, F. (2020). The differences across future teachers regarding attitudes on social responsibility for sustainable development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1715532

Gallay, L. (2006). Social responsibility. In L. Sherrod, C. A. Flanagan, R. Kassimir, & A.  K. Syvertsen (Eds.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia (pp. 599–602). Greenwood Publishing.

Golob, T., & Matej, M. (2021). From consciousness to behaviour: individual, social, and environmental responsibility among Slovenian youth. Soc. ekol. Zagreb, 30 (1), 27-43. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/372479

Gupta, S., & Agrawal, R. (2017). Environmentally responsible consumption: construct definition, scale development, and validation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25 (1), 523-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1476

Gustavsson, E., & Elander I. (2013). Households as role models for sustainable consumption. the case of local climate dialogues in two Swedish towns. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56 (2), 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.660570

Halimah, L., & Nurul, S.F. (2020). Refleksi terhadap kewarganegaraan ekologis dan tanggung jawab warga negara melalui program ecovillage. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan. 17(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i2.28465

Hatch C.D. & Stephen S.A. (2015). Gender effects on perceptions of individual and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 17(3), 63-71. https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1255&context=cob_papers

Jagers, S.C., & Simon, M. (2010). Ecological citizens: identifying values and beliefs that support individual environmental responsibility among Swedes. Sustainability, 2(4), 1055-1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/su2041055

Karatekin, K., & Uysal, C. (2018). Ecological citizenship scale development study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 8(2), 82–104. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1180924.pdf

Karwacka, M. (2019). Personal social responsibility and its impact to consumerism. in: dÅ‚ugopolska-mikonowicz, a., przytuÅ‚a, s., stehr, c. (eds) corporate social responsibility in Poland. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00440-8_15 

Korlat, S., Holzer, J., Reiter, J, Pelikan, E.R, Schober, B, Spiel, C. (2022).  The role of the big two in socially responsible behavior during the covid-19 pandemic: agency and communion in adolescents’ personal norm and behavioral adherence to instituted measures. PLoS ONE, 17(6): e0269018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269018

Laura, W., Amy K. S., & Flanagan, C.A. (2017). Developmental change in social responsibility during adolescence: an ecological perspective. Dev Psychol, 52(1), 130-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000067

Melo-Escrihuela, C. (2015). Promoting ecological citizenship: rights, duties and political agency. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 7(2), 113–134. Retrieved from https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/799

Morais, D.B. & Ogden, A.C. (2011). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15 (5), 445-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315310375308

Murdiono, M. (2014). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan untuk membangun wawasan global warga negara muda.  Cakrawala Pendidikan. 33 (3), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.2379

Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and Applications. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Orozco, C.S., MariÌa, G.H., & Saskias, C. (2015). It’s sort of my calling: the civic engagement and social responsibility of latino immigrant-origin young adults. Research in Human Development, 12:1-2, 84-99, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2015.1010350  

Pacesila, M.  (2018). The individual social responsibility: insights from a literature review. Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, 10(1), 17-26.

Salkind, N. J. (2018). Exploring Research (9th ed.). Pearson

Santoso, A.M., & Widiana, H.S. (2022). Penyusunan skala learning agility dengan aiken's v dan uji realibilitas. Jurnal Konseling Andi Matappa, 6 (1), 14-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.31100/jurkam.v6i1.1699

Sireci, S. G. & Geisinger, K. F. (1995). Using subject-matter experts to assess conten representation: an mds analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement 19 (3), 241-255.

Smith, M. J., & Pangsapa, P. (2008). Environment & citizenship: integrating justice, responsibility, and civic engagement. Zed Books

Spaargaren, G., & Oosterveer, P. (2010). Citizen-consumers as agents of change in globalizing modernity: the case of sustainable consumption. Sustainability, 2 (7), 1887-1908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2071887

Usmi, R., & Murdiono, M. (2021). Ecological citizenship in textbooks on Pancasila and Citizenship Education subjects at the secondary education level. Journal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 18 (2), 242 – 256. DOI. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v18i2.38885

Downloads

Published

2024-09-21

How to Cite

Istiqomah, A., Murdiono, M., & Hajaroh, M. (2024). Personal social responsibility in ecological citizenship: Dimensionality and scale measurement with Aiken Index Analysis. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 21(2), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i2.76295

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Article

License

  1. Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
  2. Authors transfer or license the copyright of publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
  3. Authors hereby agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraanas a Publisher of the manuscript. 
  4. Authors reserve the following: 
    1. all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights; 
    2. the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
    3. use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees; 
    4. use for internal training by author's company;
    5. distribution to colleagues for their research use;
    6. use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
    7. inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
    8. reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
    9. preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
    10. voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author's institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC-SA License.