Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Autentik untuk Pembelajaran Matematika di Kelas VII Semester 1

Rolina Amriyanti Ferita, Heri Retnawati

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan perangkat penialaian autentik untuk pembelajaran matematika di kelas VII semester 1 yang autentik, reliabel dan valid meliputi instrumen dengan kompetensi dasar bilangan bulat, garis dan sudut, serta rasio dan perbandingan untuk penilaian KI 1, KI 2, KI 3, dan KI 4 berupa: indikator, instrumen penilaian, dan rubrik penilaian. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan (research  &  development).  Penelitian  ini  dilakukan  dengan  menggunakan  model  pengembangan  Plomp (2010) tiga tahap pengembangan yaitu preliminary researchprototyping phase, dan assessment phase. Aspek reliabilitas dari ujicoba lapangan. Aspek kevalidan perangkat pembelajaran ditinjau dari penilaian para ahli.

Kata kuncipengembangan,  perangkat  penilaian autentik, asesmen, matematika kelas VII

 

Development Authentic Assessment Kit for Learning Math Class VII Semester 1


Abstract

This research was aimed to produce authentic assessment’s learning kit in mathematics learning for 7th grade semester 1 which is authentic, reliable, and valid including instrument for basic competence in integers, lines and angles, also ratio and comparison for assessment of KI 1, KI 2, KI 3, and KI 4 consist of indicators, assessment instruments, and assessment rubric. This kind of research is a research and development. This research was conducted using Plomp (2010) model consist of preliminary research, prototyping phase, and assessment phase. The reliability aspect retrieved from field trial. The validity aspect of learning kit retrieved from experts judgment.

Keywords: development, authentic assessment kit, assessment, mathematics for 7th grade


Keywords


pengembangan; perangkat penilaian autentik; matematika kelas VII

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References


Azwar, S. (2010). Validitas dan reliabilitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ambrosetti, D. D. & Cho, G. (2005). Synergism in learning: a critical reflection of authentic assessment. High School Journal, 89(1), 57-60.

Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment: enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Frey, B. B. & Schmitt, V. L. (2007). Coming to term with classroom assessment. Journal of Advanced Academic, 18(3), 402-423.

Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L. & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2), 1531-7714.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. ETR&D, 52(3), , 67-86.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Authentic assessment, student and teacher perceptions: the practical value of the five dimensional-framework. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(3), 337-357.

Herrington, J. & Herrington, A. (2006). Authentic conditions for authentic assessment:aligning task and assessment, in critical Vision. Proceedings of the 29th HERDSA Annual Conference, 10-12 July 2006, 146-151.

Hyde, D. P. (2013). What makes a good secondary assessment? On achieving the aim of assessment. Journal Education and Practice, 4(12), 188-197.

Indiana Departement of Education. (tanpa tahun). Authentic assessment. Indiana Departement of Education. Diambil tanggal 26 September 2013, dari www.msdwt.k12.in.us/msd/wp-content/.../10/authentic_assessment.pdf.

Kemdikbud. (2012). Pengembangan kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Kemdikbud. (2014). Model penilaian pencapaian kompetensi peserta didik Sekolah Penengah Pertama. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Performance-based assessment: some new thoughts on an old idea. Bulletin Pearson Education, May 2011 Issue 20, 1-4.

Mendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 66, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.

Miller M. D., Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. New York, NY: Pearson Education.

Moon, T. R., et. al. (2005). Development of authentic assessment for the middle school classroom. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2), 119-133.

Newmann, F.M & Wehalage, G. G. (1993). Five standard of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8-12.

Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M.. (2011). Educational assesment of students. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Plomp. (2010). Educational design research: an introduction. Dalam Plomp, T. & Nieveen, N. (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. (3rd print, pp. 9-35). Netherland: Netherland Institute for Curriculum Development.

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2009). Measurement and assessment in education. New York, NY: Pearson.

Rusindrayanti, R., & Santoso, R. (2015). Implementasi pendekatan saintifik mapel matematika kelas VII tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 pada kurikulum 2013 DIY. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 80-94. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pg.v10i1.9112

Shapiro, E. S. (2011). Academic skills problems: direct assessment and intervention. 4thed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Sudiyatno. (2010). Pengembangan model penilaian komprehensif unjuk kerja siswa pada pembelajaran berbasis standar kompetensi di SMK Teknologi Industry. Disertasi Doktor pada PPs UNY: Tidak diterbitkan.

Walker, M. (2011). PISA 2009 plus result: performance of 15 year-olds inreading, mathematics and science for 10 additional participants. Victoria: ACER Press.

Wibowo, R. & Wutsqa, D. U. (2014). Evaluasi pelaksanaan kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP) mata pelajaran matematika SMP di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 58-68.

Weber, M. & Stewart, B. R. (2001). Authentic assessment: good or bad?. ProQuest Agricultural Journal, The Agricultural Education Magazine, Mar/Apr 2001, 73, 5, 14.

Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance: exlporing the purpose and limits of testing. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Wright, R. J. (2008). Educational assessment: test and measurements in the age of accountability. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publication.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v11i1.9672

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika indexed by:


Creative Commons License Pythagoras is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras.

All rights reserved p-ISSN: 1978-4538 | e-ISSN: 2527-421X

Visitor Number:

View Pythagoras Stats