Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Menggunakan Metode Inkuiri

Muhammad Suhadak, Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa

Abstract


 

Tujuan penelitian ini menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran sistem persamaan linear dua variabel menggunakan metode inkuiri yang valid, praktis, dan efektif ditinjau dari prestasi dan curiosity siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan. Model pengembangan diadaptasi dari model pengembangan Borg & Gall. Pengembangan terdiri atas delapan tahap yaitu pengumpulan data, perencanaan, pengembangan produk awal, uji coba pendahuluan, revisi produk utama, uji coba utama, revisi produk akhir, dan diseminasi dan implementasi. Penelitian ini menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran sistem persamaan linear dua variabel menggunakan metode inkuiri yang meliputi silabus, RPP, LKS, dan tes. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masing-masing silabus, RPP, LKS dan tes valid, praktis, dan efektif. Valid menurut validasi ahli dengan kriteria sangat baik, praktis menurut penilaian guru, lembar penilaian siswa, dan lembar observasi pembelajaran dengan kriteria sangat baik dan efektif ditinjau dari prestasi, dengan 76,74%  siswa mencapai KKM serta efektif ditinjau dari curiosity, dengan 100% angket siswa minimal kategori baik.

Kata Kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, sistem persamaan linear dua variabel, metode inkuiri.

 

Developing Two-Variable Linear Equation Systems Teaching Package Using the Inquiry Method

 

Abstract

The study aims to develop a two-variable linear equation systems teaching package using the inquiry method, which is valid, practical, and effective in terms of students’ achievement and curiosity. This study is developmental research, with model adapted from Borg & Gall model. The development consists of eight phases data collecting, planning, developing the preliminary form of product, preliminary field testing, main product revision, main field testing, final product revision, and dissemination and implementation. This study has produced a two-variable linear equation systems teaching package using the inquiry method including a syllabus, lesson plan, worksheet, and test. The result of the study shows that each of the syllabus, lesson plan, worksheet, and test is valid, practical, and effective. They are valid according to experts’ judgment, in very good criteria; they are practical according to the teachers’ judgment, students’ judgment, and instruction observation sheet, in very good criteria; they are effective  in terms of achievement, where 76.74% student achieve the standard value and effective in terms of curiosity, where 100% of student questionnaire minimum score is in good criteria.

Keywords: development, teaching package, two-variable linear equation systems, inquiry method

Keywords


development; teaching package; two-variable linear equation systems; inquiry method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi: Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Barrow, R., & Woods, R. (2006). An introduction to philosophy of education (4thed.). Madison Ave, New York: Routledge.

Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational reseach an introduction. Broadway, New York: Longman.

Depdiknas. (2004). Hakikat penilaian pembelajaran matematika. Jakarta

Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah No. 19, Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Depdiknas. (2006). Permendiknas 22, tahun 2006, tentang Standar Isi.

Depdiknas. (2007). Permendiknas 20, tahun 2007, tentang Standar Penilaian.

Depdiknas. (2007). Permendiknas 41, tahun 2007, tentang Standar Proses.

Elliot, S. N. ,et. al. (2000). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. (3rdEdition). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Gage, N.L. & Berliner, D.C. (1984). Educational psychology. (3rdEdition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Gracolice, M. (2009). Guided inquiry and learning cycle dalam Pienta, N. J, Cooper, M. M, &Greenbowe, T. J, (Eds). Chemist Guide to Effective Teaching (pp. 27 – 41). Upper Sadle River: Pearson

Gronlund, N. E. (1988). Assesment of students achievement. Sixth Edition. Needham Height, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Haylock, D., & Thangata, F. (2007). Key concepts in teaching primary mathematics. London: Sage.

Jaworski, B. (2003). Investigating mathematics teachin: A contructivist enquiry. London: The Falmer Press.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Permendikbud 65, tahun 2013, tentang Standar Proses.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Permendikbud 66, tahun 2013, tentang Standar Penilaian.

Kemdikbud. (2013). Permendikbud 68, tahun 2013, tentang Struktur Kurikulum SMP-MTs.

Klausmeier, H. J. & Goodwin, W. (1966). Learning and human Abilities: Educational Psychology. East 33rd Street, New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

Kuhlthau, C.C., Maniotes, L.K., & Caspari, A.K. (2007). Guided inquiry learning in the 21th century. Westport,CT: Libraries Unlimited.

McElmeel, S.L. (2002). Character education: a book guide for teachers, librarians, and parents. Greenwood Village, Colorado: Greenwood Publishing Group,Inc.

Nitko, A. J. & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of student.(6th Edition). Boston: Pearson.

Nieveen, N. (2010). Formative evaluation in educational design research dalam Plomp T & Nieveen, N (eds). An Intruction to Educational. Natherland : Slo

Nunan, D. (2002). Syllabus design. Oxfrod: Oxfrod University Press.

O’Brien, J. G., Millis, B. J, & Cohen, M.W. (2nd Edition) (2008). The course syllabus a learning centered approach. Market Street, San Fransisco: Josey Bass.

Orlich, et.al. (2007). Teaching strategies, a guide to effective instructioon. (8thEdition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company .

Partin, R. L. (2009).The classroom teacher’s survival guide (3thed). Market Street, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Posamentier, A. S., Smith, B. S., & Stepelman, J. (2010). Teaching secondary mathematics (8thEdition). Boston: Pearson Education,Inc.

Prescott, A. (2011). Are we singing from the same songbook? DalamSandy Schuck, S. & Pereira, P. (Eds.), What counts in teaching mathematics. Clayton: Springer.

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology. (5th Edition). Avenue of Americas, New York: The MacGraw-Hill Companies.

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories (edisi enam) (Terjemahan Eva Hamdiah & Rahmat Fajar): Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar (Buku Asli Terbit 2012).

Shellnut, B.J .(1998). A motivating influence in the fiel of intrrutional systems design (Rev. ed.). Diambil tanggal 22 Desember 2013. http://media .wix.com/ugd/8596b6 f25d8ac72eca2f256d03200474763b0c.pdf

Westwood, P. (2000). Numeracy and learning difficulties, approch to teaching and assesment. Victoria: Acer Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v9i1.9066

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika indexed by:


Creative Commons License Pythagoras is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/pythagoras.

All rights reserved p-ISSN: 1978-4538 | e-ISSN: 2527-421X

Visitor Number:

View Pythagoras Stats