Developing the teaching factory learning media in a public vocational high school

Sintha Wahjusaputri, Elin Marlina, Siti Latifah

Abstract


This study aims at determining the success factors of the learning media of tutorial and skill e-report portfolio video-based in teaching factory learning outcomes in vocational high school. This study was the Research and Development model, through several stages, namely: (1) collecting data; (2) planning; (3) developing draft; (4) conducting initial trials; (5) revising the trial results; (6) conducting trial site research; (7) improving the productivity of the test results, (8) conducting test, (9) completing the final product; and (10) disseminating and implementing the result. This study was conducted at 58 Public Vocational High School, Jakarta. The samples were random sampling, consisting of 59 students majoring in painting and visual communication design in the control class and the experimental class. The instrument was a multiple-choice test sheet (multiple choice) through pre-test and post-test. The results of the study were analysed using a t-test. The t-test avarage of the experimental class, Visual Communication Design were 11.522. The t-test avarage of the control class were 10.832. Thus, the average learning outcomes of the experimental class were 0.69 which bigger than in the control class. In the experimental class, Painting Class, the average learning outcome was 67 and the control class was 54.5. Therefore, there was a difference of 12.5. The hypothesis stated that there were differences in teaching factory learning resulted from the pre-test and post-test experimental classes majoring in Painting and Visual Communication Design. The instructional media of Tutorials and Skill E-Report Portfolio Video-Based got very good responses from students.


Keywords


teaching factory; industrial learning; tutorial video learning media; video-based portfolio e-report skill

References


Abele, E., Metternich, J., Tisch, M., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., Elmaraghy, H., … Ranz, F. (2015). Learning Factories for research , education , and training. Procedia CIRP, 32(Clf), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187

Al Mamun, Abdullah. (2014). Effectiveness of Audio Visual Aids in Language Teaching in Tertiary Level. Dhaka: BRAC University

Afonso, P. (2018). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Collaborative Machine Tool design : the Teaching Factory paradigm Collaborative Machine Tool design : Conference the Teaching Factory paradigm Costing models for capacity optimization in Industry Trade-off of Wernke Santana. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.004

Azer, S. A. (2009). Interactions Between Students And Tutor In Problem - Based Learning: The Significance Of Deep Learning. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 25(5), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70068-3

Baena, F., Guarin, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J., & Retat, S. (2017). Learning Factory : The Path to Industry 4 . 0. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022

Christoph, H., & Zanoni, S. (2018). Improvement Curve with with Improvement Improvement in in Process. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.397

Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., & Rentzos, L. (2016). The Teaching Factory : A Manufacturing Education Paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 57, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.009

Comiskey, David. Mc Cartan, Kenny. (2011). Video: An Effective Teaching Aid? An Architectural Technologist’s Perspective. CEBE Transactions, Vol. 8, pp 25-40

Cvetkova, B., Andonovska-trajkovska, D., & Atanasoska, T. (2010). Values of some strategies of teaching and learning in fine art education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2841–2845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.425

F. Baena, A. Guarin, J. Mora, J. Sauza, and S. Retat, “Learning Factory : The Path to Industry 4 . 0,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 9, pp. 73–80, 2017.

Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect The Teaching Factory Developments and Outlook Society Paradigm : Costing models for capacity optimization in Industry Trade-off The Teaching Factory Paradigm : Developments and Outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029

Mourtzis, D., & Vlachou, E. (2018). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Augmented Reality supported Product Design towards Industry 4 . 0 : Augmented Reality supported Product Design towards Industry a Teaching Factory paradigm a Teaching Factory paradigm Costing models for capacity Dimitris Mourtzis , Vasilios Zogopoulos Industry between used capacity and operational efficiency. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.018

Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2014). Integrating Manufacturing Education with Industrial Practice using Teaching Factory Paradigm : A Construction Equipment Application. Procedia CIRP, 17, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.126Pontevedra, V., Santana, A., Afonso, P., Zanin, A., & Wernke, R. (2019). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect The Teaching Factory Network : A new collaborative paradigm for The Teaching Factory Network : A new collaborative paradigm for manufacturing education manufacturing education Costing models capacity in of Industry Trade-off. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.062

Prinz, C., Morlock, F., Freith, S., Kreggenfeld, N., & Kreimeier, D. (2016). Learning Factory modules for smart factories in Industrie 4 . 0. Procedia CIRP, 54, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.105

Reisinger, G., Trautner, T., Hennig, M., Alexandra, G. R., Mazak, T., Hold, P., … Mazak, A. (2019). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect for optimization in Industry TU capacity between used capacity and operational efficiency TU Wien Pilot Factory Industry 4 . 0 TU Wien Pilot Factory Industry 4 . 0. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.032

R, M., Santana, A., Afonso, P., Zanin, A., & Wernke, R. (2019). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect The Learning Factory – A New Stimulus to Enhance International The Learning Factory – A Collaboration New Stimulus to Enhance International Collaboration Costing models for capacity optimization between used capacity and operational efficiency. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.046.

Rentzos, L., Doukas, M., Mavrikios, D., Mourtzis, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2014). Integrating Manufacturing Education with Industrial Practice using Teaching Factory Paradigm : A Construction Equipment Application. Procedia CIRP, 17, 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.126

Stojkić, Ž., Bošnjak, I., & Zanin, A. (2019). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Development of Learning Factory at FSRE , University of Mostar Development of Learning Factory at FSRE , University of Mostar Costing models for capacity optimization in Industry 4 . 0 : Trade-off between used capacity and operational efficiency. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.029

Summak, M. S., Samancio, M., & Ba, M. (2010). Technology integration and assesment in educational settings. 2, 1725–1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.973

Sugiyono. (2009). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Sadiman, Arief S. R Rahardjo. Haryono, Anung. dan Rahardjito. (2007). Education Media understanding, development, and utilization. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada

Tvenge, N., Olga Ogorodnyk. (2018). Development Of Evaluation Tools For Learning Factories In Manufacturing Education. Procedia Manufacturing 28, 33-38.

Wahjusaputri, S., Fitriani, S., Syarif, S., & Article, H. (2019). Dinamika Pendidikan. 14(17), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v14i2.21167




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v10i1.30222

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:

ISSN 2088-2866 (print) || ISSN 2476-9401 (online)

View Journal Visitor Stats