Effect of Work-Based Learning Model on Students’ Achievement Motivation

Dwi Agus Sudjimat, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Luchyto Chandra Permadi, Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia, Indonesia

 10.21831/jptk.v25i2.24416

Abstract


This study determines the effect of the Work-Based Learning (WBL) model on achievement motivation of students in the Study Program of Mechanical Engineering at Vocational High Schools (VHS) compared to the Training Within Industry (TWI) model. This study used a quasi-experimental research method with a factorial design in two groups of XII grade vocational high school students of mechanical engineering. The data in the form of achievement motivation was collected using a questionnaire. The data were analyzed using two way Anova technique with α of 0.05. The results showed that (1) the students taught using the WBL model had a significantly higher achievement motivation than the achievement motivation of students taught using the TWI model; (2) students with high prior knowledge had a significantly higher achievement motivation than the achievement motivation possessed by students with moderate and low prior knowledge; and (3) there is an interaction between the use of learning models and students' prior knowledge towards students' achievement motivation. The findings indicated that the WBL model has the potential to improve the quality of learning outcomes of vocational education, especially in increasing students' achievement motivation, compared to traditional learning using the TWI model.

Keywords


achievement motivation, prior knowledge, work-based learning, training within industry, vocational education

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. Andrews and H. Higson, “Graduate Employability, ‘Soft Skills’ Versus ‘Hard’ Business Knowledge: A European Study,” High. Educ. Eur., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 411–422, Dec. 2008.

D. A. Sudjimat, Nopriadi, and Yoto, “Study of Implementation of Project Based Learning in Mechanical Engineering Study Program of Vocational High School,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1165, no. 1, p. 12024, Feb. 2019.

L. Sojow, A. Wajong, and N. Sangi, “Vocational Students’ Motivation for Professional Skills,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 306, no. 1, p. 12072, Feb. 2018.

D. A. Sudjimat, “Mendesain Pembelajaran Kejuruan Berkarakter Pekerja di SMK,” J. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 83–94, 2014.

D. McClelland, Human Motivation. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

John W. Santrock, “A Topical Approach to Life-Span Development Information Center.ISBN: 0072880163 Copyright year: 2005.” .

E. Purwanto, “Model Motivasi Trisula: Sintesis Baru Teori Motivasi Berprestasi,” J. Psikol., vol. 41, no. 2, p. 218, Dec. 2014.

A. B. R. Shani and J. B. Lau, Behavior in Organization an Experimental Approach. New York: McGraw Hill International Edition, 2009.

C. H. L. Seagraves, M. Osborne, P. Neal, R. Dockrell and A. Boyd, “Learning in Smaller Companies. Final Report. Educational Policy and Development, University of Stirling,” Educ. Policy Dev. Univ. Stirling., 1996.

S. Billett, “Learning through Practice: Beyond Informal and Towards A Framework for Learning Through Practice,” in Revisiting global trends in TVET, UNESCO-UNEVO, 2013.

F. Abdillah, “Work Based Learning,” Bandung, 2014.

B. T. Siswanto, “Pengaruh Model Penyelenggaraan Work-Based Learning Rolling Terpadu terhadap Aspek-Aspek Kualitas Hasil Belajar,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 21, no. 1, 2012.

W. W. Gray and B. Albrecht, “Mentoring Youth for Success,” Madison, 1999.

R. Wagner, M. Childs, and M. Houlbrook, “Work-based Learning as Critical Social Pedagogy,” Aust. J. Adult Learn., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 314–334, 2001.

R. G. Bringle, J. A. Hatcher, and R. E. Mcintosh, “Analyzing Morton ’ s Typology of Service Paradigms and Integrity,” J. Community Serv. Learn., vol. 13, No. 1, no. 2005, pp. 5–15, 2006.

A. Rasyid, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT (Numbered Heads Together) dan Kemampuan Awal terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMP Negeri 2 Poso,” Mitra Sains, vol. 3, no. 1, Apr. 2015.

H. Noelker and E. Schoenfeldt, Vocational Education: Teaching, Planning Curriculum. 1983.

D. A. Sudjimat and M. Romlie, “Karakteristik Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Dan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Matapelajaran Teknologi Pengelasan Busur Manual Di SMK (Suatu Kajian untuk Pengembangan Buku Kerja Siswa),” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Kejuruan Tantangan Pendidikan Kejuruan Abad XXI, 2016, pp. 716–725.

W. Dick and L. Carey, The Systematic Design of Instruction, 8th ed. USA: : Pearson Education, Inc, 2015.

H. Sarjono and W. Julianita, SPSS vs LISREL: Sebuah Pengantar, Aplikasi untuk Riset. Jakarta: Salemba Empat , 2011.

W. Dasna, “Innovative Learning Models. Malang: Institute for Education and Learning,” Universitas Negeri Malang, 2007.

W. Susilo, Audit SDM: Panduan Komprehensif Auditor dan Praktisi MAnajemen Sumber Daya Manusia serta Pimpinan Organisasi /Perusahaan. Depok: Vorqistatama Binamega, 2011.

S. Handayani, “Hubungan Pengetahuan, Sikap, Minat dan Motivasi Belajar dengan Prestasi Belajar Mata Kuliah KDM I Pada Mahasiswa Semester I Akper Giri Satria Husada Wonogiri,” Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 2008.

M. Iqbal, “Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Konstruk tivistik PBP (Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek) dan Tingkat Kemampuan Akademik terhadap Sikap Siswa SMA kelas X di Malang pada Ekosistem Sungai,” Universitas Negeri Malang, 2009.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v25i2.24416

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Online (e-ISSN): 2477-2410 || Printed (p-ISSN): 0854-4735

Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jptk was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Supported by:

Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Managemen

Social Media: