PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU SEKOLAH DASAR BERBASIS TUGAS POKOK DAN FUNGSI

Hesti Sadtyadi; Badrun Kartowagiran

doi:10.21831/pep.v18i2.2867

PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU SEKOLAH DASAR BERBASIS TUGAS POKOK DAN FUNGSI

Hesti Sadtyadi, STABN Raden Wijaya Wonogiri
Badrun Kartowagiran, Yogyakarta State University

10.21831/pep.v18i2.2867

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian kinerja guru sekolah dasar, dengan maksud diperolehnya komponen, indikator dan instrumen penilaian kinerja guru sekolah dasar. Instrumen penilaian kinerja guru sekolah dasar, dalam penelitian ini dikembangkan dengan metode research and development, berdasarkan model pengembangan pembelajaran Borg and Gall yang disesuaikan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis validitas dan reliabilitas, instrumen tersebut valid dan reliabel. Hasil analisis faktor menunjukkan fit model yang cukup baik, berarti dapat disimpulkan bahwa (1) instrumen penilaian kinerja guru sekolah dasar terdiri dari lima komponen yakni mengajar, mendidik, melatih dan mengarahkan, membimbing, serta menilai dan mengevaluasi, (2) masing-masing komponen instrumen penilaian kinerja guru dapat dijabarkan menjadi beberapa indikator relevan seperti yang dideskripsikan dalam hasil penelitian.

Kata kunci: instrumen penilaian kinerja, guru sekolah dasar

_____________________________________________________________

THE ASESSMENT INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ PERFORMANCE BASED ON TASKS AND FUNCTIONS

Abstract The objective of the research is to develop an assessment instrument of elementary school teachers’ performance in order to attain the components, the indicators and the assessment instrument of the elementary school teachers’ performance. The assessment instrument of elementary school teachers’ performance, in the research, was developed by using research and development method that was adapted from the Borg and Gall’s model of learning development. Based on the results of validity and reliability test, the instrument had been valid and reliable. The results of factor analysis show a quiet good fit model which leads to the following conclusions: (1) the assessment instrument of elementary school teachers’ performance consists of five components namely: teaching, educating, training and directing, guiding and scoring and evaluating; and (2) each component for the assessment instrument of elementary school teachers’ performance can be elaborated into several relevant indicators as described in the result of the study.

Keywords: instrument of performance assessment, elementary school teachers

Keywords

instrumen penilaian kinerja; guru sekolah dasar

Full Text:

FULL TEXT PDF

References

Anderson, D & Carl Brydges, B, (2011). Professional Teaching Dispositions For Edisi 2, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Basuki, H., (2004). Analisis Faktor Konfirmatori (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) dalam Mate- ri Pelatihan SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) Angkatan IV. Surabaya: Lem- baga Penelitian Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.

Berk, R. A, & Hopkins, J. (2005). Survey of

Strategies to Measure Teaching Effectiveness, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/ 2005, Vo- lume 17, Number 1, 48-62, ISSN 1812- 9129.

Borg,W.R.,& Gall,M.D. (1983). Education research: an introduction. New York: Long- man inc.

Borg,W.R.,& Gall,M.D., Gall, J.P.(2003).

Education research: an introduction. New York: San Francisco.

Budiyono, (2009). Bahan Kuliah Statistik Multivariat. Yogyakarta: Program Pasca Sarjana UNY.

Coakes, S.J. & Steed. D. (1996). SPSS for Window: analysis without anguish. Mel- bourne: Jacaranda Wiley LTD.

Dharma, S. (2011). Manajemen Kinerja. Yogya- karta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ghozali, I. (2008). Structural equation modelling: teori, konsep & aplikasi program liserel. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.

Hair,J.E, Jr. et al. (2006). Multivariate data ana- lysis. (6 ed). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Mohamad, E., (2012), Evaluasi Kinerja Guru SMPN di Kota Gorontalo. Disertasi, Uni- versitas Negeri Jakarta

Nuland, S.V. (2009). Teachers Codes; learning from experience, New York: International for Institute for educational planing.

Nunnally, J. C. (1981). Psychometric Theory (2nd Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rivai, V., et al. (2008). Performance appraisal; system yang tepat untuk menilai kinerja karyawan dan meningkatkan daya saing perusahaan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saud,U.S.,. (2010). Pengembangan Profesi Guru.Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sudarwan, D. (2002). Inovasi Pendidikan dalam upaya Peningkatan profesionalisme Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A.,& Sumarto,S., (2005). Penentu Kinerja Murid Sekolah Dasar di Indonesia. Jakarta: Semeru, Yertas Verja (World Bank).

Supardi, (2013). Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tsang, T.H.Y. (2003). Using Standardized Perf- ormance Observations And Interviews To Asess The Impact of Teacher Education, Dissertation. In the Graduate College The University of Arizona. (Versi Elec- tronik by ProQuest Information and Learning Company).

Wagiran (2010), Determinan Kinerja Guru SMK Kelompok Keahlian Teknologi dan Industri Bidang keahlian Teknik Mesin. Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Wibowo, A., (2004). SEM Structural Equation Modeling (Pengantar Analisis Faktor Eks- ploratory dan Analisis Faktor Confirmatory). Surabaya: Lembaga Penelitian Univer- sitas Airlangga.

Wijanto,S.,H., (2008). Structural Equation Mo- deling dengan Lisrel 8.8. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Yamin, M., & Maisah. (2010). Standardisasi Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2867