KESIAPAN GURU SD DALAM PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN TEMATIK-INTEGRATIF PADA KURIKULUM 2013 DI DIY
Ali Mustadi, Program Studi Pendidikan dasar Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Vera Yuli Erviana, IKIP PGRI Wates, Indonesia
Slamet Arifin, SD Negeri Tanjungtirto Berbah Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kesiapan guru Sekolah Dasar (SD) dalam menerapkan Kurikulum 2013 khususnya dalam pembelajaran tematik-integratif di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY). Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian survei. Populasi penelitian adalah guru kelas I dan IV yang terdapat di wilayah DIY. Jumlah sampel yang diambil dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 182 guru SD yang berasal dari 49 SD negeri dan 15 SD swasta yang dijadikan pilot project berdasarkan data dari Kemdikbud DIY. Hasil penelitan menunjukkan bahwa persentase kesiapan guru SD di DIY dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran tematik-integratif pada Kurikulum 2013 sebesar 75,85% (siap), dilihat dari aspek kesiapan yaitu aspek Behavioral Readiness diperoleh persentase sebesar 80% (sangat siap), aspek Emotive-Ettitudinal sebesar 78,39% (sangat siap) dan aspek Cognitive Readiness sebesar 71,18% (siap). Sedangkan kesiapan guru SD di setiap kabupaten diperoleh hasil persentase sebagai berikut: Sleman 76,13% (sangat siap), Yogyakarta 78,72% (sangat siap), Bantul 73,16% (siap), Gunungkidul 75,54% (siap), dan Kulon Progo 75,42% (siap).
THE STUDY ON THE ELEMANTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS READINESS IN IMPLEMENTING THEMATIC-INTEGRATIVE TEACHING AND LEARNING IN CURRICULUM 2013, YOGYAKARTA
ABSTRACT
This study aims to describe the readiness of elementary school teachers in implementing curriculum 2013, based on thematic-integrative learning in Yogyakarta Province. This is a survey study. The research population were elemantary school teachers of class I and IV in DIY. The research sample consisted of 289 elemantary school teachers from 49 public schools and 15 private elementary schools which used as pilot project based on the data from Kemdikbud. The result shows that the percentage of elementary school teachers readiness in to implementing thematic-integrative learning is 75.85% (ready): the precentage of readiness behavioral aspects is 80% (well prepared), emotive ettitudinal aspect is 78.39% (well prepared) and cognitive readiness aspects is 71.18% (ready). While the readiness of elementary school teachers in each district are follows: Sleman 76.13% in the category of (well prepared), Yogyakarta 78.72% in the category of (well prepared), Bantul 73.16% in the category of (ready), Gunungkidul 75.54% in the category of (prepared ), and Kulon Progo 75.42% in the category of (ready).
Keywords: Elemantary school teachers readiness, thematic-integrative, kurikulum 2013Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arifin, Zaenal. (2010). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya
Danim, S. (2010). Perkembangan peserta didik. Bandung: Alfabeta
Depdiknas. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran yang mengaktifkan siswa. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. (2000). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Feldman, S.R. (2012). Discovering the life span. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Fogarty, R. (1991). How to integrate the curricula. Palatine: Skylight Publising Inc.
Hoover, J.J. (1990). Curriculum adaption: a five-step process for classroom implementation. Journal of Intervention in School and Clinic Vol 25:407.
Huber & Hutchings. (2008). Integrative Learning: Mapping The Terrain International. Journal for The Scholarship of Teaching & Learning Vol.2 No.1.
Irianto, Y B. (2011). Kebijakan pembaruan pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Kemdikbud. (2013). Kompetensi Dasar SD/MI Versi Maret 1.
Kerlinger, F.N. (2006). Asas-asas penelitian behavioral edisi ketiga. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Kon Chon Min, dkk. (2012). Teachers' Understanding and Practice towards Thematic Approach in Teaching Integrated Living Skills (ILS) in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 2 No. 23 December 2012.
Kyriacou, C. (2009). Effective teaching in school (theory and practice). United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes.
Mardapi, Djemari. (2007). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia.
Nazir, M. (2005). Metode penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Maddox, N. et. all. (2000). Learning Readiness: An Underappreciated Yet Vital Dimension In Experiential Learning. Jornal of Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning.
Sisdiknas. (2012). Uji Publik Kurikulum 2013: Penyederhanaan, Tematik-Integratif.http://www.kemdiknas.go.id/kemdikbud/uji-publik-kurikulum-2013-1. Diakses pada tanggal 10/03/2013 pukul 09.00 WIB.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukandi. (2003). Belajar aktif dan terpadu. Surabaya: Duta Graha Pustaka.
Sukmadinata, N.S. (2010). Metode penelitian. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tim Pustaka Yustisia. (2007). Panduan lengkap KTSP. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
Trianto. (2010). Model pembelajaran terpadu: konsep, landasan, dan implementasinya pada kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Trianto. (2012). Model pembelajaran terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v2i2.2717
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Jurnal Prima Edukasia indexed by:
All rights reserved p-ISSN: 2338-4743 |e-ISSN: 2460-9927
Jurnal Prima Edukasia by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpe/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |
View Prima Edukasia Journal Stats |