THE STAKEHOLDERS OF INDONESIA’S CREATIVE INDUSTRIES SMES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS

Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni

doi:10.21831/efisiensi.v18i2.39351

THE STAKEHOLDERS OF INDONESIA’S CREATIVE INDUSTRIES SMES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS

Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni, Universitas Prasetiya Mulya, Indonesia

10.21831/efisiensi.v18i2.39351

Abstract

Abstract: The Stakeholders of Indonesia’s Creative Industries SMEs and Their Relationships. This study aims to identify the stakeholders of the Creative Industries (CI) in Indonesia and their structural patterns of relationships through applying network structure theories. CI is one of the government’s priorities decreed by the President of Indonesia and thus chosen as the case study. This study employed two tools to investigate the relational aspect of the network using GEPHI. The contents analysis using MAXQDA uses data attained through 19 in-depth interviews and 30 focus group discussions from different sectors and stakeholders to represent three regions of Indonesia. Size, density, centrality, heterogeneity, and modularity partition are performed to analyze four different clusters in the network theories. Overall network graph signs imply that Pelaku Industri Kriya (Craft Industry Players), Dinas Koperasi dan UMKM (Cooperative and SME’s office), and Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan (Department of Industry and Commerce) are the most popular among other stakeholders in the CI network, and they also have a large number of connections with others. The practical contribution of this paper is for policymakers to have a more systematic approach in embracing SMEs in the creative industries with more sustainable solutions by improving stakeholder cooperation.

Keywords: creative industries; small-medium enterprise; social network analysis policy; stakeholders

Abstrak: Stakeholders Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) Industri Kreatif Indonesia dan Hubungan Mereka. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi pemangku kepentingan Industri Kreatif (IK) Indonesia serta pola hubungan strukturalnya melalui penerapan teori-teori network structures. IK merupakan salah satu prioritas pemerintah yang ditetapkan oleh Presiden Indonesia, sehingga dipilih sebagai studi kasus untuk penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua metode untuk menyelidiki aspek relasional dari jaringan menggunakan GEPHI. Analisis konten melalui MAXQDA menggunakan data yang diperoleh melalui 19 wawancara dan 30 focus group discussion dari berbagai sektor dan pemangku kepentingan yang mewakili tiga wilayah Indonesia. Partisi ukuran, kepadatan, sentralitas, heterogenitas, dan modularitas dilakukan untuk menganalisis empat cluster berbeda yang berada dalam network theories. Tanda-tanda grafik jaringan secara keseluruhan menandakan bahwa Pelaku industri kreatif, Dinas Koperasi dan UMKM dan Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan adalah pemangku kepentingan yang paling penting dalam jaringan IK dan memiliki koneksi yang banyak dengan pemangku kepentingan lainnya. Kontribusi praktis dari penelitian ini adalah sehingga pembuat kebijakan memiliki pendekatan yang lebih sistematis dalam merangkul UKM IK dengan solusi yang lebih berkelanjutan dengan meningkatkan kerjasama para pemangku kepentingan.

Kata kunci: industri kreatif; usaha kecil dan menengah; kebijakan analisis jaringan sosial; pemangku kepentingan

Keywords

creative industries; small-medium enterprise; social network analysis policy; stakeholders

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alexandri, M. B., Maulina, E., Chan, A., & Sumadinata, R. W. S. (2019). Creative Industries: Existence of Arts Traditional Industries in Indonesia. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(11). Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/articles/creative-industries-existence-of-arts-traditional-industries-in-indonesia-7913.html

Araujo, L., & Brito, C. (1997). Agency and Constitutional Ordering in Networks: A Case Study of the Port Wine Industry. International Studies of Management & Organization, 27(4), 22–46. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40397386

Badan Ekonomi Kreatif. (2019). Laporan Kinerja Badan Ekonomi Kreatif 2019. Retrieved from https://www.kemenparekraf.go.id/asset_admin/assets/uploads/media/pdf/media_1598879701_BUKU_BEKRAF_28-8-2020.pdf

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Ekspor Ekonomi Kreatif 2010-2016. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/download.html?nrbvfeve=NzRiNWMxNjUwMjUxMzJlOThhMzZjOGYw&xzmn=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnBzLmdvLmlkL3B1YmxpY2F0aW9uLzIwMTgvMDQvMDkvNzRiNWMxNjUwMjUxMzJlOThhMzZjOGYwL2Vrc3Bvci1la29ub21pLWtyZWF0aWYtMjAxMC0yMDE2Lmh0bWw%3D&twoadfnoarfea

Bandyopadhyay, S., Rao, A. R., & Sinha, B. K. (2010). Models for Social Networks With Statistical Applications. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

BOP Consulting. (2010). Mapping the Creative Industries: A Toolkit.

Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008

Burt, R. S. (2000). The Network Structure Of Social Capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1

Cahyadin, M. (2017). EFISIENSI INDUSTRI MIKRO DAN KECIL DI INDONESIADENGAN PENDEKATAN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA). Peningkatan Daya Saing UMKM Berbasis Ekonomi Kreatif Dalam Era Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN.

Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi Network Visualization. Produce advanced network graphs in Gephi and gain valuable insights into your network datasets. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd.

Cooper, Chris, Scott, N., March, R., & Wilkinson, I. (2004). The network structure of tourism operators in three regions of Australia. Queensland: CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.crctourism.com.au/wms/upload/images/Disc of images and PDFs/for bookshop/Documents/Cooper_NetwrkTourismOps.pdf

Czakon, W. (2014). Network Structure and Performance in the Tourism Industry. In Tourism Management, Marketing, and Development (pp. 135–148). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137354358.0012

Dredge, D., & Pforr, C. (2008). Chapter 6. Policy Networks and Tourism Governance. In C. Cooper, N. Scott, & R. Baggio (Eds.), Network Analysis and Tourism (pp. 58–78). Clevedon: Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845410896-008

Fahmi, F. Z., Koster, S., & van Dijk, J. (2016). The location of creative industries in a developing country: The case of Indonesia. Cities, 59, 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.06.005

Fahmi, F. Z., McCann, P., & Koster, S. (2015). Creative economy policy in developing countries: The case of Indonesia. Urban Studies, 54(6), 1367–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015620529

Fathoni, R., & Somadi, S. (2019). Analisis Efisiensi Industri Kreatif Unggulan Kota Bandung Dengan Pendekatan Data Envelopment Analysis. 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36618/competitive.v14i1.503

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392

Heryani, H., Legowo, A. C., Nugroho, & Prapto, I. (2020). Strategi Pengembangan Industri Kreatif untuk Inovasi. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 30(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2020.30.3.290

Knoke, D. (2013). Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 42(2), 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306113477381y

Mangifera, L. (2019). Stakeholders Analysis For Creative Industry Development. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v19i2.5467

Maryunani, S. R., & Mirzanti, I. R. (2015). The Development of Entrepreneurship in Creative Industries with Reference to Bandung as a Creative City. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(August 2014), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.324

Matsuo, T., & Hashimoto, K. (2015). Tourism Informatics: Towards Novel Knowledge Based Approaches (Vol. 90). Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47227-9

Michalski, R., Palus, S., & Kazienko, P. (2011). Matching Organizational Structure and Social Network Extracted from Email Communication. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 87, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21863-7_17

Muhyadi, M. (2017). PERAN ADMINISTRASI DALAM MEMBANGUN MASYARAKAT BERKARAKTER. EFISIENSI - KAJIAN ILMU ADMINISTRASI, 14(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v14i1.16479

Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103

Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory and methodology. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Prell, C., Hubacek, K., & Reed, M. (2009). Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources, 22(6), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802199202

Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Scott, N., Baggio, R., & Cooper, C. (2008). The network concept and tourism. In Network analysis and tourism: From theory to practice (pp. 15–23). Clevedon: Channel View Publications.

Suhartanto, S. (2019). MEWADAHI COMMUNITY BASED TOURISM DALAM COMMUNITY GROUP UNTUK PENGEMBANGAN INDUSTRI PARIWISATA. EFISIENSI - KAJIAN ILMU ADMINISTRASI, 16(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v16i2.27419

Tao, J., Ho, C.-Y., Luo, S., & Sheng, Y. (2019). Agglomeration economies in creative industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 77, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.04.002

Timur, S., & Getz, D. (2008). A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110810873543

UNESCO, & UNDP. (2013). Creative economy report 2013: Special edition: Widening local development pathways. New York and Paris.

Wäsche, H., & Woll, A. (2010). Regional Sports Tourism Networks: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 15(3), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775085.2010.513146

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. In Proceedings of the Institute for System Programming of RAS. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2014-26(1)-19

West, M. D. (2001). Theory, Method, and Practice in Computer Content Analysis. Connecticut: Ablex Publishing.

Weyer, J. (2000). Soziale Netzwerke als Mikro-Makro-Scharnier. Fragen an die soziologische Theorie. In Soziale netzwerke: Konzepte und methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen netzwerkforschung (pp. 237–254). Munich: Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-16505

Yasniasari, A. (2015). Strategi Dinas Perindag Dalam Mengembangkan Industri Kreatif Sektor Kerajinan Batu Marmer Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Mahasiswa Universitas Brawijaya, 3(5), 775–781.

Yusuf, S., & Nabeshima, K. (2005). Creative industries in East Asia. Cities, 22(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.001

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v18i2.39351