Mapping of Internal Audit Quality on the Public Sector in Indonesia: A Systematic Review

Ranto Partomuan Sihombing

doi:10.21831/economia.v19i1.38073

Mapping of Internal Audit Quality on the Public Sector in Indonesia: A Systematic Review

Ranto Partomuan Sihombing, Soegijapranata Catholic University, Indonesia

10.21831/economia.v19i1.38073

Abstract

This study aims to explore internal audit quality in Indonesia, especially in the public sector. The researcher used a systematic literature review method to synthesize the research results conducted over the past seven years between 2016 and 2022. This study found that most internal audit quality is only output-oriented, primarily influenced by compliance driver variables. The most researched variables are independence and competence. It also adopts attribution theory. However, the kaizen philosophy perspective assesses quality based on the demand-based driver. Finally, this study proposes a conceptual model for developing internal audit quality and future research that should be conducted based on outcomes using a qualitative approach.

Keywords

mapping, systematic review, internal audit, kaizen philosophy, attribution theory

Full Text:

PDF

References

ACFE Indonesia Chapter. (2020). Survei Fraud Indoneia. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/SURVEI-FRAUD-INDONESIA-2019.pdf

Anderson, U. L., Head, M. J., Ramamoorti, S., Riddle, C., Salasick, M., & Sobel, P. J. (2017). Internal Auditing: Assurance & Advisory Services (4th ed.). Internal Audit Foundation.

Arigawati, D. (2019). Hubungan Penerapan Supervisi Audit Dengan Kualitas Laporan Audit Internal Pada Bpk-Ri, Jakarta. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 12(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v12i2.1771

Birnberg, J. G., Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2006). Psychology Theory in Management Accounting Research. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 1(06), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(06)01004-2

Buchheim, L., Krieger, A., & Arndt, S. (2020). Innovation types in public sector organizations: a systematic review of the literature. Management Review Quarterly, 70(4), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00174-5

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a Systematic Review. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671–689).

Erlina, & Muda, I. (2018). The effect of self efficacy and professional development on the work quality of internal auditor. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(5), 1292–1304.

Gramling, A. a, & Vandervelde, S. D. (2006). Assessing Internal Audit Quality. Internal Auditing, 21(3), 26-30,32-33. http://search.proquest.com/docview/214393978?accountid=13552%5Cnhttp://findit.lib.rmit.edu.au:9003/sfx_local??genre=article&sid=ProQ:&atitle=ASSESSING INTERNAL AUDIT QUALITY&title=Internal Auditing&issn=0897-0378&date=2006-05-01&vo

Hawkes, L. C., & Adams, M. B. (1994). The Total Quality Management Revolution. Managerial Auditi, 9(4), 11–18.

Hawkes, L. C., & Adams, M. B. (1995). Total quality management and the internal audit: Empirical evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 10(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909510077361

Hazaea, S. A., Zhu, J., Al-Matari, E. M., Senan, N. A. M., Khatib, S. F. A., & Ullah, S. (2021). Mapping of internal audit research in China: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1938351

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Ibrani, E. Y., Faisal, F., Sukasari, N., & Handayani, Y. D. (2020). Determinants and Consequences of Internal Auditor Quality on Regional Government Performance. Quality-Access to Success, 176(21), 87–92.

Kai, R., Yusheng, K., Ntarmah, A. H., & Ti, C. (2022). Constructing internal audit quality evaluation index: evidence from listed companies in Jiangsu province, China. Heliyon, 8(9), e10598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10598

Kiswara, D. E., Iswajuni, I., Handayani, C., & Soetedjo, S. (2018). Meta Analisis: Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Audit Pada Aparat Pengawasan Internal Pemerintah (Apip) Di Indonesia. JURNAL AKUNTANSI, EKONOMI Dan MANAJEMEN BISNIS, 6(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaemb.v6i1.811

Lowensohn, S., Johnson, L. E., Elder, R. J., & Davies, S. P. (2007). Auditor specialization, perceived audit quality, and audit fees in the local government audit market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 705–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.10.004

Mahadewi, I. G. A. C., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2022). Faktor Internal dan Eksternal yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(6), 1591. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2022.v32.i06.p15

Mu, R., & Wang, H. (2020). A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1838787

Nerantzidis, M., Pazarskis, M., Drogalas, G., & Galanis, S. (2022). Internal auditing in the public sector: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2020-0015

Nurdiono, & Gamayuni, R. R. (2018). The effect of internal auditor competency on internal audit quality and its implication on the accountability of local government. European Research Studies Journal, 21(4), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1132

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. In Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (1st ed.). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

Pitt, S.-A. (2014). Internal Audit Quality: developing a quality assurance and improvement program (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118777213

Polizzi, S., Lupo, F., & Testella, S. (2022). Quality assurance and improvement program : some considerations for central banks. The TQM Journal, 1754–2731. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2021-0128

Pratomo, D. (2016). Pengaruh Kompetensi,Kompleksitas Tugas, dan Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 16(2), 123–133. www.jab.fe.uns.ac.id

Sari, L. D. P., & Tri, W. (2018). Expectation Gap pada Persepsi Auditor Internal dengan Auditee terkait Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 5(01), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.v5i01.172

Sukesi, S. (2019). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independesi, Pengalaman Audit Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Audit Internal Dengan Etika Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pada Inspektorat Jenderal di Tentara Nasional Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 6(1), 95–120.

Surya, G. (2021). Deretan Kasus Korupsi Terbesar di Indonesia, Negara Rugi Puluhan Triliun. https://www.kompas.tv/article/204569/deretan-kasus-korupsi-terbesar-di-indonesia-negara-rugi-puluhan-triliun

Susanti, W. (2019). Persepsi Auditor Tentang Faktor Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Audit Internal. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Bisnis, 24(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.35760/eb.2019.v24i2.1905

Taman, A., Wijayanto, P. A., & Rachmawati, E. (2018). Kualitas Audit Auditor Internal Pemerintah: Kompetensi, Independensi Dan Profesionalisme. JURNAL AKUNTANSI, EKONOMI Dan MANAJEMEN BISNIS, 6(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaemb.v6i1.813

The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2017). International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) (Issue October 2016). https://www.iia.org.au/sf_docs/default-source/quality/ippf-standards-2017.pdf?sfvrsn=2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v19i1.38073