Impacts of Sustainability Performance and Firm Characteristics on Risk and Corporate Value

Lilik Handajani, University of Mataram, Indonesia
Lalu Hamdani Husnan, University of Mataram, Indonesia
Endar Pituringsih, University of Mataram, Indonesia

Abstract


Abstract

This research investigates the effect of sustainability performance and firm characteristics on risk and corporate value by applying a structural equation model. The focus of the analysis is on Indonesian companies that received sustainability ratings continuously from the Asia Sustainability Reporting Award during the 2018-2019 period. The process involved analyzing secondary data presented in annual and sustainability reports to obtain relevant content for corporate sustainability performance. The findings showed that the improvement of the sustainability performance was able to significantly reduce corporate risk but did not have any influence on corporate value. It was also discovered that large companies with political connections face increased risk, thereby, limiting their ability to enhance corporate value significantly. Moreover, the incorporation of sustainability investment strategies was observed to require business risk management to reduce future environmental and social risks associated with long-term corporate value creation.

 

Keywords:sustainability performance, risk, firm value


 

Dampak Kinerja Keberlanjutan dan Karakteristik Perusahaan Terhadap Risiko dan Nilai Perusahaan

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaruh kinerja keberlanjutan dan karakteristik perusahaan terhadap risiko dan nilai perusahaan. Analisis model struktural digunakan untuk menguji perusahaan Indonesia yang secara konsisten menerima peringkat keberlanjutan dari Asia Sustainability Reporting Award pada tahun 2018-2019. Data sekunder berupa laporan tahunan dan laporan keberlanjutan perusahaan dianalisis untuk memperoleh konten yang relevan dengan kinerja keberlanjutan perusahaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan kinerja keberlanjutan akan menurunkan risiko perusahaan secara signifikan, namun tidak mempengaruhi peningkatan nilai perusahaan. Perusahaan besar dengan koneksi politik dapat menghadapi peningkatan risiko, namun tidak dapat berkontribusi secara signifikan untuk peningkatan nilai perusahaan. Penggabungan strategi investasi keberlanjutan membutuhkan manajemen risiko bisnis untuk mengurangi risiko lingkungan dan sosial di masa depan untuk penciptaan nilai perusahaan dalam jangka panjang.

 

Kata kunci:kinerja keberlanjutan; risiko, nilai perusahaan


Keywords


sustainability performance, risk, firm value

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aggarwal, P. (2013). Impact of sustainability performance of company on its financial performance: A study of listed Indian Companies. Global Journal of Management and Business Research Finance, 13(11), 61–70.

Agustin, M., Dzulkirom, M., & Darmawan, A. (2019). Analysis of the effect of firm size, financial leverage, profitability, diversification on market risk and stock return (Case study of manufacturing companies in the consumer goods industry sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2007-2016). The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 27(3), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijabs.2019.27.3.3

Ali, S., Liu, B., & Su, J. J. (2018). Does corporate governance quality affect default risk? The role of growth opportunities and stock liquidity. International Review of Economics and Finance, 58 422-448. This, 58, 422–448. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/buspapers/1699%0AResearch

Alshirah, M. H., Abdul Rahman, A., Mustapa, I. R., & Alshira’h, A. F. (2020). The effect of firms characteristics on corporate risk disclosure: Empirical evidence from Amman Stock Exchange. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v10-i3/8083

Amran, A., Manaf Rosli Bin, A., & Che Haat Mohd, H. (2009). Risk reporting: An exploratory study on risk management disclosure in Malaysian annual reports. Managerial Auditing Journal, 24(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900910919893

Ariefianto, M. D., & Soepomo, S. (2013). Risk-taking behavior of Indonesian banks: Analysis on the impact of deposit insurance cooperation establishment. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 15(3), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v15i3.66

Atan, R., Razali, F. A., Said, J., & Zainun, S. (2016). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and its effect on firm’s performance: A comparative study. International Journal of Economics and Management, 10 (Special issue 2), 355–375.

Banerjee, R., & Gupta, K. (2017). The effects of environmental sustainability and R&D on corporate risk-taking: International evidence. Energy Economics, 65, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.016

Boubakri, N., Mansi, S. A., & Saffar, W. (2013). Political institutions, connectedness, and corporate risk-taking. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(3), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.2

Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149

Camilleri, M. A. (2015). Environmental, social, and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2014-0065

Chai, B. F., & Mirza, S. S. (2019). Political association, managerial power heterogeneity, and corporate risk-taking in China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja , 32(1), 1373–1393. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1634613

Chelawat, H., & Trivedi, I. V. (2016). The business value of ESG performance: the Indian context. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1–2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0064-4

Chong, L. L., Ong, H. B., & Tan, S. H. (2018). Corporate risk-taking and performance in Malaysia: the effect of board composition, political connections, and sustainability practices. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(4), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2017-0095

Chvatalová, Z., Kocmanová, A., & Dočekalová, M. (2011). Corporate sustainability reporting and measuring corporate performance. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 359 AICT, 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22285-6_27

De La Cuesta, M., & Valor, C. (2013). Evaluation of the environmental, social, and governance information disclosed by Spanish-listed companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2011-0065

Diemont, D., Moore, K., & Soppe, A. (2016). The downside of being responsible: Corporate social responsibility and tail risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2549-9

Ding, S., Jia, C., Qu, B., & Wu, Z. (2015). Corporate risk-taking: Exploring the effects of government affiliation and executives’ incentives. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1196–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.014

Dorfleitner, G., Halbritter, G., & Nguyen, M. (2015). Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility - An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16(7), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2015.31

Elzahar, H., Hussainey, K., Mazzi, F., & Tsalavoutas, I. (2015). Economic consequences of key performance indicators’ disclosure quality. International Review of Financial Analysis, 39, 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.03.005

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

Freeman, R. E., & Mcvea, J. (2008). A Stakeholder approach to strategic management. In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (pp. 183–201). https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.00007.x

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Gengatharan, R. (2020). Effect of firm size on risk and return: Evidence from Sultanate of Oman. European Journal of Business and Management, 12(March), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/12-9-08

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. m., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). California: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002

Handajani, L., Akram, A., & Rifai, A. (2021). Sustainable banking and bank performance. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 16(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2021.v16.i01.p12 CITATION:

Harjoto, M., & Laksmana, I. (2018). The impact of corporate social responsibility on risk-taking and firm value. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3202-y

Hoepner, A. G. F., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L. T., & Zhou, X. (2020). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. In Finance Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2874252

Islam, M. T., Kokubu, K., & Nishitani, K. (2020). Corporate social reporting in the banking industry of Bangladesh: a test of legitimacy theory. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2019-0185

Jha, M. K., & Rangarajan, K. (2020). Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-020-00038-z

Jiang, C. (2008). The nature of political connections and firm value. In International Finance Review (Vol. 9). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-3767(08)09017-1

Khlif, H., & Hussainey, K. (2016). The association between risk disclosure and firm characteristics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Risk Research, 19(2), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.961514

Le Thi Kim, N., Duvernay, D., & Le Thanh, H. (2021). Determinants of financial performance of listed firms manufacturing food products in Vietnam: regression analysis and Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition analysis. Journal of Economics and Development, 23(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-09-2020-0130

Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., & Heenetigala, K. (2017). Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927

Madrigal, H., Guzmán, B. A., & Guzmán, C. A. (2015). Determinants of corporate risk disclosure in large Spanish companies: A snapshot. Contaduria y Administracion, 60(4), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2015.05.014

McElroy, M. W., & Engelen, J. M. L. van. (2012). Corporate Sustainability Management The Art and Science of Managing Non-Financial Performance.

Mirza, S. S., Safdar, R., Yu, Y., & Gulzar, M. A. (2019). Managerial empowerment and firm risk-taking. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856963

Natsir, K., & Yusbardini, Y. (2020). The effect of capital structure and firm size on firm value through profitability as an intervening variable. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 145(Icebm 2019), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200626.040

Nugroho, M., & Halik, A. (2021). The effect of growth and systematic risk on the firm’s value: Profitability as a mediating variable. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 23(3), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v23i3.2468

Nursetya, R. P., & Hidayati, L. N. (2021). How does firm size and capital structure affect firm value? Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 1(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.34001/jmer.2020.12.01.2-7

Oktaviani, R. F. (2020). Effect of firm growth and firm size on company value with earning per share as moderation. Economics and Accounting Journal, 3(3), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.32493/eaj.v3i3.y2020.p221-229

Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Clark, E. (2016). Do political connections affect firm performance? Evidence from a developing country. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(8), 1876–1891. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1041845

Sakuma-Keck, K., & Hensmans, M. (2013). A motivation puzzle: Can investors change corporate behavior by conforming to ESG pressures? In Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance, and Sustainability (Vol. 5). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-9059(2013)0000005023

Sila, I., & Cek, K. (2017). The impact of environmental, social and governance dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Australian evidence. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.310

Sjöström, E., & Welford, R. (2009). Facilitators and impediments for socially responsible investment: A study of Hong Kong. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(5), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.210

Soebyakto, B. B., Mukhtaruddin, Relasari, & Sinulingga, A. (2018). Company characteristics and risk management disclosure: an empirical study of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.36

van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG integration and the investment management process: fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2017). Sustainability and Enterprise Risk Management: The first step towards integration. Retrieved from www.wbcsd.org

Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635

Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082607




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v18i2.42883

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Archive, Citation & Indexing:

More archive, citation, & indexing...

Creative Commons License

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License