Balinese cultural representation from the perspective of the Balinese wordlist

Authors

  • I Made Sena Darmasetiyawan Universitas Udayana, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v12i2.86302

Keywords:

Balinese wordlist, word recognition, community influence, lexical categorization, linguistic anthropology

Abstract

Based on the data gathered from the PARADISEC catalogue of the Balinese wordlist, as part of the OCSEAN project, 1,228 words were recorded and classified into several categories, such as the body, agriculture and vegetation, animals, the physical world, basic actions and technology, food and drink, spatial relations, kinship, motion, sense perception, quantity, emotions and values, cognition, time, speech and language, the house, warfare and hunting, possession, clothing and grooming, religion and belief, social and political relations, law, as well as miscellaneous function words. This study examines the Balinese wordlist from the OCSEAN data and explores the correlation between the number of words gathered and the speakers’ language recognition and comprehension within their community. Since the process of word recognition involves identifying both meaning and form (orthographic and phonological), these aspects originating from each speaker are generally influenced by their surrounding community. Through mapping the quantitative data, possible borrowings, and accuracy in the wordlist, several assumptions can be made. For example, the high number and accuracy of words related to agriculture (including its associated resources) may be attributed to the fact that many Balinese speakers come from farming communities. The implications of this study suggest that future research may benefit from combining pre-existing linguistic data with the psychological aspects of speakers and the cultural characteristics of their communities.

References

Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975073

Arka, I. W. (2005). Speech levels, social predicates and pragmatic structure in Balinese: A lexical approach. Pragmatics, 15(2–3), 169–203.

Atai, M. R., & Habibi, P. (2009). Exploring sub-disciplinary variations and generic structure of applied linguistics research article introductions using CARS model. Applied Linguistics, 2, 26–51.

Chatterjee, S. K. (1997). Balinese traditional calendar. Indian Journal of History of Science, 32(4), 325–347.

Darmasetiyawan, I. M. S., & Ambridge, B. (2022). Syntactic representations contain semantic information: Evidence from Balinese passives. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), Article 33133. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33133

Darmasetiyawan, I. M. S., Aryawibawa, I. N., & Mulyawan, I. W. (2024). Psycholinguistics. Mega Press Nusantara.

Edwards, O. (2021). Rote-Meto comparative dictionary. ANU Press.

Gardani, F. (2021). On how morphology spreads. Word Structure, 14(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0184

Gaskell, M. G. (Ed.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press.

Geertz, C., & Geertz, H. (1975). Kinship in Bali. University of Chicago Press.

Haspelmath, M., & Tadmor, U. (Eds.). (2009). Loanwords in the world's languages: A comparative handbook. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442

Heggarty, P. (2010). Beyond lexicostatistics: How to get more out of ‘word list’ comparisons. Diachronica, 27(2), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.2.07heg

Kaplan, J. (2017). From lexicostatistics to lexomics: Basic vocabulary and the study of language prehistory. Osiris, 32(1), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1086/694093

Kitley, P. (2000). Television, nation, and culture in Indonesia. Ohio University Press.

Klamer, M., & Moro, F. (Eds.). (2023). Traces of contact in the lexicon. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004529458

Klamer, M., Edwards, O., Fricke, H., Gialitaki, Z., Moro, F., Palmér, A., Saad, G., Sulistyono, Y., Visser, E., & Wu, J. (2021). Practicalities of language data collection and management in and around Indonesia. Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 22(2), 467–521.

Lailiyah, N., & Wijayanti, F. I. (2022). Kekerabatan bahasa Jawa, Bali dan Bima: Perspektif linguistik historis komparatif. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.308

Ntelu, A., & Djou, D. N. (2017). The language family relation of local languages in Gorontalo Province: A lexicostatistic study. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 6(11), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i11.1285

Pye, C. (2017). The comparative method of language acquisition research. University of Chicago Press.

Rahman, Z. A., & Agus, M. (2022). Kekerabatan bahasa Makassar dan bahasa Selayar: Analisis leksikostatistik dan glotokronologi. Gema Wiralodra, 13(1), 215–232.

Sulistyono, Y., & Fernandez, I. Y. (2015). Penerapan teknik leksikostatistik dalam studi komparatif bahasa Baranusa, Kedang, dan Lamaholot di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v16i1.1506

Tadmor, U., Haspelmath, M., & Taylor, B. (2012). Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary. Diachronica, 27, 226–246.

Wiemer, B., Wälchli, B., & Hansen, B. (Eds.). (2012). Grammatical replication and borrowability in language contact (Vol. 242). De Gruyter Mouton.

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

[1]
Darmasetiyawan, I.M.S. 2025. Balinese cultural representation from the perspective of the Balinese wordlist. LingTera. 12, 2 (Nov. 2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v12i2.86302.

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.