The power of money in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men: An Alvin Toffler perspective
Of Mice and Men is one of John Steinbeck novellas that describe the situation and condition of the great depression of American in 1930s. The novel portrays the lives of working-class men, particularly the main characters George, Lennie, and Curley. This study aims to explore the power of money in Of Mice and Men by employing an extrinsic approach that connects literary analysis with social thought, particularly Alvin Toffler’s theory of power dynamics. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method within the field of literary studies. The data are collected from the novel Of Mice and Men as the primary source, focusing on dialogues, narrative descriptions, and character interactions related to economic conditions. Data collection is conducted through close reading and note-taking techniques. Furthermore, the data are analyzed using an interpretative method by applying Toffler’s theory of power to identify how money functions as a source of power, control, and inequality within the story. By examining the characters' economic struggles and aspirations, this study reveals how wealth, as represented by money, shapes relationships, opportunities, and social hierarchies. Using Toffler's perspective, this study analyzes the depiction of economic dependency and powerlessness during the Great Depression. The findings show that money functions in three significant ways: (1) as a source of hope for laboring characters, (2) as a tool of control and domination exercised by capital owners over workers, and (3) as a symbol of social and economic inequality.
Downloads
Agboh, E. K. (2022). Demythologizing the American Dream in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men. Uirtus Peer-Reviewed Journal of Arts and Humanities, 3(2), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.59384/uirtus.2022.2653
Akhter, T. (2020). Literature and Society: A critical analysis of literary text through contemporary theory. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(3), 2228-2234.
Alguzo, N. (2024). Dreams turned into nightmares: Reimagining the American Dream in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men. Steinbeck Review, 21(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.5325/steinbeckreview.21.2.0176
Annet, K. A. (2025). The representation of marginalized communities in literature. Research Output Journal of Education, 5(2), 12-15. https://doi.org/10.59298/ROJE/2025/521215
Annisa, L. I., Noor, R., & Suryadi. (2021). Negosiasi ideologi pengarang pada novel of Mice and Men karya John Steinbeck kajian sosiologi sastra dalam perspektif Antonio Gramsci. Anuva, 5(3), 431-432. Retrieved from https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/anuva/article/view/12510/6662
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). pp. 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage
Dodd, N. (2014). The social life of money. Princeton University Press
Faruk. (2017). Pengantar sosiologi sastra dari srukturalisme hingga post modernisme. Pustaka Pelajar
Galbraith, J. K. (2009). The great crash 1929. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Hussein, Z. A., & Ahmed, A. N. (2019). Migration in John Steinbeck's “Of Mice and Men.” (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis, Tikrit University).
Jacobs, G. & Slaus, I. (2012). The Power of money. Cadmus, 1(5), 68-69. https://www.cadmusjournal.org/article/issue-5/power-money
Jones, G. (2021). Reclaiming John Steinbeck: Writing for the future of humanity. Cambridge University Press
Kennedy, D. M. (1999). Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929–1945. Oxford University Press
Kombieni, D. (2020). African Americans’ dreams and expression of love during the Great Depression. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(7), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.87003
Lawrence, C. (2020). Is Lennie a monster? A reconsideration of Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men in a 21st century inclusive classroom context. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0393-8
Lukács, G. (1971). The theory of the novel. MIT Press
Meng, F., & Liu, F. (2018). An analysis of John Steinbeck‘s humanistic concern in of mice and men. English Language and Literature Studies, 8(3), 38-39. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v8n3p39
Nikolić, J. (2022). Popular Culture and Power Relations in John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men. Philologia.
Putranto, A. P. & Sosronegoro, E. (2012). The Pursuit of American Dream in the main character of Dreiser’s Sister Carrie. (Tesis S2 Pengkajian Amerika, Universitas Gadjah Mada). https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/57647
Shillinglaw, S. (Ed.). (2021). John Steinbeck in context. Cambridge University Press
Simmel, G. (2004). The philosophy of money. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481134
Steinbeck, J. (1965). Of Mice and Men. Retrieved from https://giove.isti.cnr.it/demo/eread/Libri/sad/OfMiceAndMen.pdf
Straumann, H. (1965). American literature in twentieth century. Harper & Row
Tayib, C. K., & Hassan, H. S. (2026). An intersectional analysis of race, gender, age, and disability discrimination in Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men. Journal of Language Studies, 10(1), 408-425. https://doi.org/10.25130/Lang.10.1.P2.22
Toffler, A. (1990). Powershift: Knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st century. Bantam.
Wellek, R. & Warren, A. (1949). Theory of literature. Penguin Books
Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press
Zakaria, W., & Alyati, W. F. (2012). Alvin Toffler: Knowledge Technology and Change in Future Society. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 1, 54-61. https://bgsp.edu/app/uploads/2014/12/Toffler-Knowledge-Technology-Change-in-theFuture.pdf
Zhang, X. (2023). Research on the conflict between typical characters in Of Mice and Men from the perspective of realism. Communications in Humanities Research, 11, 271–275. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/11/20231463
Copyright (c) 2026 Eka Harisma W, Nina Sulistyowati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





