PENGEMBANGAN TES KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI FISIKA (PysTHOTS) PESERTA DIDIK SMA

Edi Istiyono; Djemari Mardapi; Suparno Suparno

doi:10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120

PENGEMBANGAN TES KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI FISIKA (PysTHOTS) PESERTA DIDIK SMA

Edi Istiyono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Djemari Mardapi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Suparno Suparno, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120

Abstract

Penelitian dilakukan untuk mengembangkan instrumen kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (PhysTHOTS) peserta didik SMA dan mendapatkan karakteristik PhysTHOTS. Kisi-kisi instrumen disusun berdasarkan aspek dan subaspek kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi, yang selanjutnya digunakan untuk menyusun item-item. Instrumen terdiri atas dua perangkat tes yang masing-masing memiliki 26 item termasuk delapan anchor item dan telah divalidasi oleh ahli pengukuran, ahli pendidikan fisika, ahli fisika, dan praktisi. Instrumen yang telah divalidasi diujicobakan pada 1.001 siswa dari sepuluh SMAN di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Data politomus dianalisis menggunakan Partial Credit Model (PCM). Hasil uji coba menunjukkan bahwa semua item sebanyak 44 dan instrumen PhysTHOTS terbukti fit dengan PCM, reliabilitas instrumen sebesar 0,95, indeks kesukaran item mulai -0,86 sampai 1,06 yang berarti semua itemdalam kategori baik. Dengan demikian, PhysTHOTS memenuhi syarat digunakan untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika peserta didik SMA.

Kata kunci: pengembangan instrumen, tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi, fisika, politomus, dan PCM

______________________________________________________________

DEVELOPING HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILL TEST OF PHYSICS (PhysTHOTS) FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Abstrak The objectives of this research were to develop an instrument for measuring senior high school students’ physics higher order thinking skills (PhysTHOTS) and to obtain the characteristics of the PhysHOTS. The instrument blue print was developed based on the aspects and sub-aspects of high order thinking skills, then it was used to develop the items. Two sets of instrument consisting of 26 items and each, including eight anchor items were then validated by promotors, measurement experts, physics specialists, physics education experts, and practitioners. The validated instruments were then tried out on 1,001 students of ten senior high schools throughout Special Province of Yogyakarta. The polytomous data were analyzed according to the Partial Credit Model (PCM). The results show that the 44 items and PhysTHOTS were fit to the PCM, the reliability of the test was 0.95, the items’ difficulty indexes were between -0.86 and 1.06. Therefore, the PhysTHOTS are qualified to measure senior high school students’ physics higher order thinking skills.

Keywords: instrument development, physics test of higher order thinking skills, polytomous, and PCM

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References

Adams, R. J. & Khoo, S. T. (1996). Quest: The interactive test analysis system version2.1. Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Reearch.

Albert, L.R, Corea, D & Macadino, V. (2012). Rhetorical Ways of Thinking Vygotskian Theory and Mathematical Learning. New York: Springer

Anderson, L.W., and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy of Learning, Teach- ing, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Barnett, J. E and Francis, A.L. (2012). Using higher order thinking questionsto foster critical thinking: a classroom study. Edu- cational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. http://www.tandfonline. com/loi/cedp20. Diakses tanggal 10 Desember 2012

Bloom, B.S., et al. (1979). Taxonomy of Edu- cational Objectives: Handbook I Cognitive Domain. London:Longmans Group Ltd.

Bond, TG and Fox, CM. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model. Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (2 rd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bonk.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess High- er Order Thinking Skills in Your Class- room. Alexandria: ASCD

BSNP. (2006). Standar Kompetensi dan Kom- petensi Dasar Mata Pelajaran Fisika Untuk SMA dan MA. Jakarta: BSNP- Depdiknas

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendi- dikan Nasional No 20 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Penilaian

Dikpora DIY. (2012). Hasil Nilai UN 2012 SMA/MA/SMK di DIY (27 Mei

. Yogyakarta: Dikpora DIY http://www.pendidikandiy.go.id/? view=v berita&id_sub=2692 diakses tanggal 1 Juni 2012.

Efendi, Ridwan. (2010). Kemampuan Fisika Siswa Indonesia dalam TIMSS. Prosi- ding Seminar Nasional Fisika 2010 ISBN: 978-979-98010-6-7

Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Devoping and Valida- ting Multiple Choise Test Items. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hambleton & Swaminathan. (1985). Item Res- ponse Theory Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.

Hambleton dan Swaminathan (1991): Fun- damentals of Item Response Theory. Cali- fornia: SAGE Publications, Inc

Keeves, J. P. & Alagumalai. (1999). New Approach to measurement. Dalam: Masters, G.N. & Keeves, J.P. (eds.). Advances in Measurement in Educational Research and Assessment (pp.23-42). Amsterdam: Pergamon, An imprint of Elsevier Science

Keeves, J.P. & Masters, G.N. (1999). Intro- duction. Dalam: Masters, G.N. & Keeves, J.P. (eds.). Advances in Mea- surement in Educational Research and Assessment (pp.1-22).

Amsterdam: Per- gamon, An imprint of Elsevier Science Kolen, M.J. & Brannen, R.L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York: Sprinegr-Velag New York, Inc. Nitko, A.J & Brookhart, S. M. (2011).

Educational assessment of students. (6th ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Oriondo, L.L.and Dallo-Antonio, E.M. (1998). Evaluation Educational Outcomes. Manila: Rex Printing Compagny, inc

Piaget, J. (2005). The psychology of intellegence [Versi elektronik]. Taylor & Francis e- Library.

Pusat Kurikulum. (2007). Naskah Akademik Kajian Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata Pel- ajaran IPA. Jakarta: Balitbang Depdik- nas

Ramos, J. L. S., Dolipas, B. B., & Villamor

B. B. (2013). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students: A Re- gression Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, ISSN 1839‐9053l , p: 48-60. Diambil tanggal 20 Desember 2013 dari http://www.auamii.com/jiir/Vol- 01/issue-04/5ramos.pdf

Reedal, K.E. (2010). Jean Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory in Mathematics Edu- cation. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science – Ripon Colle- ge. Summation, May 2010, pp. 16-20 http://ripon.edu/macs/summation.

Schraw, G, and Robinson, D.H. (2011). Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills. New York: Information Age Publishing, Inc

Seon, Hi Sin. (2009). How to tread omitted respons in Rasch model based equa- ting [Versi elektronik] Practical Assess- ment, Research & Evaluation. ISSN 1531- 7714, Volume 14, Number 1, p: 1-8

Sudjana, Nana. (1990). Penilaian Hasil Blajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Ros- dakarya

Suryabrata, S. (2002). Pengembangan alat ukur psikologis. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Cen- ter. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Boston: The TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Diambil tanggal 5 Januari 2013, dari http: timss.bc.edu/ timss2011/release.html

Van den Berg, G. 2008. The use of assess- ment in the development of higher- order thinking skills. Africa Education Review, 1:2, 279-294. Diambil Tanggal

Oktober 2012 dari http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/18146620408566285.

Van der Linden, W. J & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Res- ponse Theory. New York: Springer- Verlag New York, Inc

Widhiarso, Wahyu. (2010). Model politomi dalam teori respons butir. Yogyakarta: Psikologi UGM

Wright, B.D. & Masters, G.N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press.

Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Applying the Rasch model to psychosocial measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne: Edu- cational Measurement Solutions.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120