Reporting Guidelines
Reporting Guidelines and Study Registration · Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora
Report fully, and register where it is the norm.
How authors should report their studies, and when a study must be registered.
|
01
Reporting guidelines
|
Authors should follow the recognised reporting guideline that fits their study design, where one exists. The editors may ask for the completed checklist. Examples:
— literature and systematic reviews: a guideline for reporting reviews, such as PRISMA;
— qualitative studies: a guideline for reporting qualitative research, such as COREQ or SRQR;
— surveys and other quantitative studies: the reporting standards of the relevant discipline;
— trials and other experimental designs: the reporting guideline for that design, such as CONSORT.
The Equator Network lists reporting guidelines by study design.
|
|
02
Registration
|
Studies for which prospective registration is standard practice, such as clinical or other trials, must be registered in a public registry. The name of the registry and the registration number are given in the manuscript. Systematic reviews are encouraged to state where the protocol was registered.
|
|
03
Protocols
|
Material changes from a registered or published protocol are disclosed and explained.
|
|
04
Where to state it
|
Mention the guideline and any registration in the Method section and in the end-matter statements described in the Author Guidelines.
|
|
05
Related
|
|
06
Sources
|
This policy is based on the guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE):
|
