Editorial Roles

Editorial Roles and Responsibilities  ·  Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora
Who decides, and who is accountable.
What each editorial role does, and the standards that apply to everyone in it.
01
Roles
Editor-in-Chief Responsible for the scholarly content, the decisions, the policies, and the ethics of the journal, and leads the editorial team. Makes the final decision on a manuscript.
Associate Editor Handles manuscripts in the field of expertise, chooses reviewers, assesses the reviews, and recommends or decides within the authority given.
Editorial Board Advises on policy, reviews manuscripts, and suggests reviewers. Membership does not give a right to publish in the journal or to bypass review.
Administrative support Runs the editorial workflow, checks submissions, keeps the editorial records, and refers ethical or procedural concerns to the right editor.
The names and affiliations of the people in each role are listed on the Editorial Team page.
02
Authority and accountability
—  The Editor-in-Chief has authority over the scholarly content of the journal, within its focus, scope, and published policies.
—  Reviewers advise. They do not decide whether a manuscript is published.
—  The publisher, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, provides support and the legal, financial, and operational framework, but does not decide on individual manuscripts. See Editorial Independence.
03
Standards for every editor
—  Judge manuscripts on scholarly merit, without regard to the identity, nationality, institution, or standing of the authors.
—  Keep submitted manuscripts, reviews, and correspondence confidential.
—  Declare any competing interest and step aside from the manuscripts it affects. See Editorial Competing Interests.
—  Follow the published policies of the journal and the COPE Core Practices, and refer suspected misconduct to the Editor-in-Chief.
—  Keep a record of decisions and of the reasons for them.
04
Related
05
Sources
This policy is based on the guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE):