KUALITAS TES POTENSI AKADEMIK VERSI 07A

Saifuddin Azwar,

Abstract


Karakteristik butir dan subtes dari Tes Potensi Akademik (TPA) versi 07A diteliti berdasarkan data jawaban 198 pelamar Program Magister Psikologi UGM tahun 2007, sementara validitas prediksi tes dianalisis berdasarkan data jawaban 80 mahasiswa yang diterima. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa butir-butir subtes verbal, kuantitatif, dan penalaran memiliki tingkat kesulitan sedang, indeks daya beda sangat baik, dan distraktor berfungsi dengan baik. Semua skor subtes memiliki koefisien reliabilitas yang sangat tinggi, demikian juga skor TPA. Namun, analisis validitas skor TPA kurang dapat memprediksi IPK semester pertama.

Kata kunci: TPA, analisis butir, validitas prediksi

Keywords


TPA, analisis butir, validitas prediksi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, M. J. & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Azwar, S. (1997).Reliabilitas dan validitas (edisi ke 3). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

_____.(2007). Tes Potensi Akademik-Versi 07A. Yogyakarta:Sigma Alpha Test Specialist.

Crocker,L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. ForthWorth: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston,INC.

Cronbach,L.J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing(3rded.). New York, NY:Harper and Row.GRE-bulletin.(1980). GRE General Tests, 1980.http://www.ets.org/MediTests/GRE/pdf/0708_gre_bulletin.pdf

Guilford, J.P. (1953). The correlation of an item with a composite of the remaining items in a test. Educational and Psychological Measurement,13, 1, 87-93.

_____.(1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rded.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hartigan,J.A., & Wigdor, A.K. (Eds.) (1989). Fairness in employment testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the general aptitude test battery. Washington,DC: National Academy Press.

Kehoe,J. (1997). Basic item analysis for multiple-choice tests. ERIC Digest.http:/www.ericdigests.org/1997-1/basic.html

Kaufman,A.S. (1972). Restriction of range: Questions and answers. Test Service Bulletin. The Psychological Corporation, 59.

Scorepak. (2005). Item analysis. Office of Educational Assessment, University of Washington.http://www.washington.edu/oea/pdfs/resources/item analysis.pdf.

Thorndike,R.M., Cunningham, G.K.,Thorndike,R.L., & Hagen, E.P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education. New York. NY:Macmillan Publishing Company.

Wolf,R. (1967). Evaluation of several formulae for correction of item-total correlations in item analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 1,2 1-26.

Zucker,S. (2003). Fundamentals of standardized testing. Harcourt Assessment Report, Harcourt Assessment,Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v12i2.1429

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:

   

ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics