Examining lexical density of Bahasa Indonesia for foreign language learners (BIPA) textbook

Rizky Anugrah Putra; Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz; Syamsuddin Syamsuddin

doi:10.21831/lt.v11i1.67363

Examining lexical density of Bahasa Indonesia for foreign language learners (BIPA) textbook

Rizky Anugrah Putra, Universitas Alkhairaat Palu, Indonesia
Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Biak, Indonesia
Syamsuddin Syamsuddin, Universitas Alkhairaat Palu, Indonesia

10.21831/lt.v11i1.67363

Abstract

Lexical density is often overlooked by authors of textbooks for foreign learners of the Indonesian language. However, the level of lexical density significantly influences the accessibility of reading materials for their intended audience. As developers of language teaching materials, particularly for the Indonesian language, lexical density must be considered to ensure the appropriateness of instructional materials at the appropriate level. Taking this issue into account, this study aims to evaluate the extent of lexical density in the instructional materials designed for teaching Indonesian to foreign learners, developed by the APPBIPA Central Sulawesi, at the BIPA 1 level or equivalent to CEFR level A1. To address this question, descriptive research with content analysis was conducted by analyzing the reading texts found in the textbook using the lexical density formula developed by Ure, and identifying the content word classes and their functions. Among the ten units analyzed, there were 36 reading texts that indicated that the ongoing development of this book still maintains a high level of lexical density, reaching 64.13%. This high lexical density is attributed to the differences in linguistic systems and the content of the instructional materials, which generally have a density in the range of 50-60%. This research shows that Indonesian language textbooks for non-native speakers still have high lexical density for beginner levels. Therefore, adjustments are needed based on the level and learning goals of the current BIPA curriculum.

Keywords

Lexical density; textbook; Bahasa Indonesia for foreign language learner; BIPA

Full Text:

FULLTEXT PDF

References

Amer, M. A. B. (2021). Lexical density and readability of secondary stage English textbooks in Jordan. International Journal for Management and Modern Education. 2, (2) 11-20

Aziz, E. A. (2023, February 23). Bahasa daerah dalam impitan zaman. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa - Kemendikbudristek. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. https://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/artikel-detail/3848/bahasa-daerah-dalam-impitan-zaman

Bukoye, R. O. (2018, June 20–22). Utilization of instruction materials as tools for effective academic performance of students: Implications for counselling. The 2nd Innovative and Creative Education and Teaching International Conference (Icetic2018), Badajoz, Spain.

Castello, E. (2008). Text complexity and reading comprehension tests. Peter Lang.

Daller, H., van Hout, R., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2003). Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 197-222.

Fajardo, I., Ávila, V., Ferrer, A., Tavares, G., Gómez, M., & Hernández, A. (2014). Easy‐to‐read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(3), 212-225.

Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2015). Analysing lexical density and lexical diversity in university students’ written discourse. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 546–556. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.477

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and written language. [Waurn Ponds], Vic: Deakin University.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd Eds.). Edward Arnold.

Ismail, N. M., Yoestara, M., & Jamilah, S. (2023). Comparing lexical density in teacher talks: Elementary school and higher education level. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 142-152.

Johansson, V. (2008). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: A developmental perspective. Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers, 53, 61-79.

Krashen, S. (2002). Theory versus practice in language training. In Enriching ESOL pedagogy (pp. 235-252). Routledge.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Bahasa dan peta bahasa di Indonesia (pp. 12–13).

Kurniawan, K., Fahmi, R. N., & Mulyaningsih, I. (2022). Kesesuaian isi buku ajar BIPA “Sahabatku Indonesia” untuk penutur bahasa Inggris level 1 (Conformity of BIPA textbook contents “Sahabatku Indonesia” for level 1 English speakers). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 7(2), 279-293.

Laufer, B. (2005). Lexical frequency profiles: From Monte Carlo to the real world. A response to Meara (2005). Applied Linguistics, 26(4):582-588.

Maamuujav, U. (2021). Examining lexical features and academic vocabulary use in adolescent L2 students’ text-based analytical essays. Assessing Writing, 49, 100540.

Masyi'ah, A. N., & Ciptaningrum, D. S. (2018). An analysis and evaluation of two English textbooks for second graders of junior high school. LingTera, 5(1), 32-40.

Marlin, S., & Ashadi, A. (2019). Examining English textbook prototype development for vocational high school students. LingTera, 6(2), 162-171.

Mulyanti, W., & Soeharto, P. P. (2020, April). Text complexity in English textbooks for junior high school: A systemic functional perspective. In Twelfth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2019) (pp. 217-222). Atlantis Press.

Nasseri, M., & Thompson, P. (2021). Lexical density and diversity in dissertation abstracts: Revisiting English L1 vs. L2 text differences. Assessing Writing, 47, 100511.

Perfetti, C. A. (1969). Lexical density and phrase structure depth as variables in sentence retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(6), 719–724. doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80035-6

Pinto, M., Caballero, D., Sales, D., & Segura, A. (2020). Belief in importance of information literacy abilities among undergraduates. Underlying factors and analysis of variance. Reference Services Review, 48(4), 559–577. doi:10.1108/rsr-03-2020-0020

Putra, D. A., & Lukmana, I. (2017). Text complexity in senior high school English textbooks: A systemic functional perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 436-444.

Rizkiani, D., Mahdi, S., & Sujatna, E. T. S. (2022). Lexical density and readability of the Facil’s ‘advanced learning textbook’for Indonesian high school students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 741-752.

Sari, D. (2016). Measuring quality of reading materials in English textbook: The use of lexical density method in assessing complexity of reading materials of Indonesia’s curriculum–13 (K13) English textbook Dian Sari. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 1(2), 30-39.

Solikhah, I., & Budiharso, T. (2020). Standardizing BIPA as an international program of a language policy. Asian ESP Journal, 16(5.2), 181-205.

Stromqvist, S., Victoria, J., Sarah, K., Hrafnhildur, R.,Ravid, A., & Dorit R. (2002). 'Toward a crosslinguisticcomparison of lexical quanta in speech and writing'. Written language and literacy, 5,45-67

Sujatna, E. T. S., Heriyanto, H., & Andri, S. (2021). Lexical density and variation in Indonesian folklores in English student textbooks: An SFL study. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajarannya, 15(2), 62-67.

Suyitno, I. (2007). Pengembangan bahan ajar Bahasa Indonesia untuk Penutur Asing (BIPA) berdasarkan hasil analisis kebutuhan belajar. Wacana, 9 (1), 62–78.

Syarif, H., & Putri, R. E. (2018). How lexical density reveals students’ability in writing academic text. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 12(2), 86-94. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v12i1.10408

To, V., Fan, S., & Thomas, D. (2013). Lexical density and readability: A case study of English textbooks. Internet Journal of Language, Culture and Society, 37(37), 61-71.

Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. Perren and J.L.M.Trim (eds), Applications of Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Zamanian, M., & Heydari, P. (2012). Readability of texts: State of the art. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(1).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/lt.v11i1.67363